Increasing the Effectiveness of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Report with Autoverification: A Case Study of Udonthani Hospital

Authors

  • Yaowaruk Jutrakul Department of Medical Laboratory and Clinical Pathology, Udonthani Hospital, Udonthani Province, Thailand

Keywords:

Autoverification, Laboratory test results, Turnaround time

Abstract

The amount of laboratory work is increasing every year, therefore, development of work in the post-analytical process by using laboratory information system and quality control standards is required in the operation to achieve accuracy, completeness and fast as well as to help assist reducing laboratory workload. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of laboratory report using the autoverification of 35 test items in clinical chemistry laboratories in Udonthani Hospital, Thailand.  A data set was collected before and after using autoverification. in which the former data was obtained from 1st July 2020 to 31st July 2020, in the total of 52,132 tests and the latter data was derived after using autoverification from July 1st to 31st July 2021, in the total of 32,880 tests. The results revealed that the total waiting time for laboratory results was reduced by 9.05 minutes with statistically significant difference (p<0.05), except for CA 15-3 and AFP.  Furthermore, the staff’s workload using autoverification reporting decreased by more than 60%, except for  AST, ALP, LDH, and B-HCG which were reduced  by 59.85, 58.13, 28.50, and 23.81%, respectively. The overall results of staff’s workload exhibited reduction of 84.53%. For the percentage of achieved turnaround time to receipt report in routine lab and ordering tests that include special test items with setting time at  90 and 120 minutes, it was found that before the study the success scores were 87.60% and 95.80%, respectively, but after using autoverification reporting, it was shown that all achievement scores increased to 94.20 and 98.60%, respectively, with statistically significant difference (p<0.05). The findings demonstrated that the developing laboratory services with autoverification for laboratory report can help to increase productivity in terms of reducing turnaround time for laboratory results, reduce the staff ’s workload in checking and reporting results and improve the satisfaction and success of ensuring the timely test results of more than 90%. Interestingly, the usage of autoverification systems can expand the work and add more test items in clinical chemistry and in other laboratories with automated analyzers.

References

HREX.asia. 5 principles of lean system (LEAN) how to use them to increase organizational efficiency; 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 4]. Available from: https://th.hrnote.asia/orgdevelopment/lean-management-210621/html/

The Medical Technology Council. Thailand medical technology standard: 2022. 1st ed. Nonthaburi; 2022. P. 36-64. (in thai)

Fort Krit Siwara Hospital. Department of Pathology. Ensuring the quality of test results. WP-LAB-2. 2022; 11: 1-39.

Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Autoverification of clinical laboratory test results; Approved Guideline. AUTO10-A. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2006.

Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. AUTO 15 Autoverification of medical laboratory results for specific disciplines - Second Edition. CLSI document; Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2019.

Randell EW, Short G, Lee N, et al. Autoverification process improvement by six sigma approach: clinical chemistry & immunoassay. Clin. Biochem. 2018; 55: 42-48.

Promnuch S, Vanavanan S, Kumproa N, Bumrungpol P. Autoverification in clinical chemistry laboratory. J Med Tech Assoc Thailand. 2019; 2(47): 7001-15.

Yan C, Zhang Y, Li J, et al. Establishing and validating of a laboratory information system‐based auto‐verification system for biochemical test results in cancer patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2019; 33: 1-8.

Nuanin S, Tientadakul P, Reesukumal K, Piyophirapong S, Gerald JK, Pratumvinit B. Autoverification improved process efficiency, reduced staff workload, and enhanced staff satisfaction using a critical path for result validation. SMJ. 2020; 4: 296-306.

Topcu DI, Gulbahar O. A model to establish autoverification in the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem. 2021; 93: 90-8.

Kumsaen P, Najermploy A, Rujanan Kachenchat R. Development of autoverification system for complete blood count (CBC) analysis. Srinagarind Med J. 2023; 38(2): 120-9.

Wang Z, Peng C, Kang H, et al. Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19: 123.

Wongkrajang P, Reesukumal K, Pratumvinit B. Increased effectiveness of urinalysis testing via autoverification. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020; 34(1): e23029. 1-6

Udonthai Hospital. Department of Medical Laboratory and Clinical Pathology. Reporting test results autoverification and manual verification. UD-WI-LAB(CHE)-006. 2020; 12: 1-8.

Kumfong A, Taecheusai P. Effectiveness of clinical chemistry laboratory report via autoverification system in Lopbuli Cancer Hospital. J DMS. 2022; 1(47): 64-71.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-13

How to Cite

1.
Jutrakul Y. Increasing the Effectiveness of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Report with Autoverification: A Case Study of Udonthani Hospital. วารสารเทคนิคการแพทย์ [internet]. 2024 Aug. 13 [cited 2025 Dec. 10];52(2):9008-22. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jmt-amtt/article/view/264622

Issue

Section

Original Articles