Self-Efficacy with Information Technology Program to Promote Bullying Prevention Among Early Adolescent Males

Main Article Content

Prakaitip Polprateep
Naruemon Auemaneekul
Arpaporn Powwattana

Abstract

The purpose of this quasi-experimental research aimed to examine the effect of self-efficacy with information technology program to prevent bullying among early male adolescents. This study was guided by Self-efficacy theory. Sample included 30 male adolescents aged between 10 and 12 years old studying at grade 5 in schools under the Office of Bangkok Primary Educational Service Area, Bangkok Metropolitan. Participants were divided into experimental and comparison groups. The study was conducted over the eight consecutive weeks. Data were collected using a set of selfadministered questionnaires at 3 time points (pre-test, post-test and a follow up). Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, chi-square, Independent t-test, and Repeated Measure ANOVA.
          Results showed that the experimental group reported significant higher scores of post-test and up regarding the perception of self-efficacy ability from subjected to bullying and self-efficacy behavior from subjected to bullying than pre-test (p<.001). Compared with the comparison group, the experimental group reported significantly different between mean scores of the perception of
self-efficacy ability from subjected to bullying and self-efficacy behavior from subjected to bullying (p<0.001). Compared to pre-test, the mean score of being physical bullied, verbal bullied, emotional and social bullied in the experimental group was significantly lower in post-test and follow up (p<0.001) and mean score between experimental group and comparison group were statistically significant different (p<.001). Results of this study indicate that self-efficacy with information technology program to prevent bullying among early male adolescents might increase self-efficacy ability and self-efficacy behavior of the subjects from bullying in school.
self-efficacy behavior of the subjects from bullying in school.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Polprateep, P., Auemaneekul, N., & Powwattana, A. (2020). Self-Efficacy with Information Technology Program to Promote Bullying Prevention Among Early Adolescent Males. Journal of Health and Nursing Research (Journal of Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Bangkok), 36(1), 164-176. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/bcnbangkok/article/view/242294
Section
Research articles

References

1. Somphong C. Child Watch: Bangkok Metropolitan Region (Bangkok Nakhon Pathom Nonthaburi Pathum Thani Samut Prakan Samut Sakhon). Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund;2015. (in Thai).

2. Thai Health Recruitment Center. 5 protects 5 stops Reduce the problem. 2016. (cited 2018 April 16). Retrieved from https://www.dmh.go.th/news-dm.

3. Churairat P. Types of bullying and problem management of bullying among early adolescent at Bangkok Metropolitan. Program in Demography. Mahidol university. 2015:96-99. (in Thai)

4. Apinya Y, Weena T., Arpaporn P. Predictive factors for adolescent bullying behavior in the Bangkok metropolitan. Nursing Journal of The Ministry of Public Health 2016;(48):73-82. (in Thai).

5. Chutinart S, Alisa V. Prevalence of bullying and associated psychosocial factors among lower secondary school students in Muang, Chiangmai., Journal of the Psychiatric Association of Thailand 2014;(53):221-30. (in Thai).

6. Susan G. Williams, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Cory Wornell & Heather Finnegan. Adolescents Transitioning to High School: Sex Differences in Bullying Victimization Associated with Depressive Symptoms, Suicide Ideation, and Suicide Attempts Journal of School Nursing 2017;33(6):467-79.

7. Nahla Mansour Al Ai, Muntaha Gharaibeh & Mohammad Jaser Masadeh. Students' Perceptions of Characteristics of Victims and Perpetrators of Bullying in Public Schools in Jordan Nursing research. Journal Nursing Research 2017;66(1):40-8.

8. Srisawat, P. A Development of Bullying Prevention in School Model. Veridian E-Journal Silpakorn University 2018;11(1):3653-67. (in Thai).
9. Bandura A. Social Lerning Theory. New Jersey: Prentice – Hall; 1977.

10. Constantinos M. Kokkinos, Nafsika Antoniadou, Angeliki Asdre & Kyriaki Voulgaridou. Parenting and Internet Behavior Predictors of Cyber-Bullying and Cyber-Victimization among Preadolescents. Journal Deviant behavior 2015;37(4):439-55.

11. Huang, Hui-Wen Chen, Jyu-Lin Wang, Ruey-Hsia. Factors associated with peer victimization among adolescents in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research 2018;26(1):52–9.

12. Antti Karna, Todd D.Little, Marinus Voeten, Elisa Poskiparta, Anne Kaljonen, & Christina Salmivallr. A large-scale evaluation of the Kiva Antibullying Program: Grades 4-6. Journal of Child development. 2014;82(1):311-30.

13. Ersilia Menesini Christina Salmivalli. Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions. Journal Psychology, Health & Medicine 2017;22(1):242-53.

14. Constantinos M. Kokkinos, Nafsika Antoniadou, Angeliki Asdre Kyriaki Voulgaridou. Parenting and Internet Behavior Predictors of Cyber-Bullying and Cyber-Victimization among Preadolescents. Journal Deviant behavior 2015;37(4):439-55.

15. Fatma A, Sultan A. The effectiveness of assertiveness training for school-aged children on bullying and assertiveness level. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2016;(36):186-90.

16. Meline M. Kevorkian, Albert Rodriguez, Matthew P. Earnhardt, Tom D. Kennedy, Robin D’Antona, Ashley G. Russom & Jia Borror. Bullying in Elementary Schools. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma. 2016;9(4):267-76.