Development of a Learning Model to Strengthen Professional Identity among Students of Bachelor of Public Health Program in Community Public Health, Sirindhorn College of Public Health, Praboromarajchanok institute


  • Saowaluk Seedaket Sirindhorn College of Public Health, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand
  • Tepthai Chotchai Sirindhorn College of Public Health, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand


model of learning, strengthen professional Identity, research and development


     This research aimed to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a learning model to strengthen professional identity among bachelor of public health students in community public health (CPH) program. The research was conducted in 3 phases as the following; Phase 1: studied of fundamental data by synthesis the concepts, theories, and related researches. The data were collected with 18 lecturers Interviewing, 10 college executive committees group discussion, and questionnaire employers in various departments in the 7th health area, including 10 community hospital directors, 10 public health executives, 20 directors of Tambom Health Promotion hospitals, and 20 public health technical officers or registered nurses in service units. The associated factors to strengthen professional identity were also studied which data were collected in 115 students in CPH program with questionnaires which the reliability was 0.82 Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Phase 2: Developed and evaluated the quality of the model and tested in 20 3th-year students in CPH program. Phase 3: Trialed and evaluated the effectiveness of the model in 45 4th-year students in CPH program. Analyzed data with Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient, Paired t-test, Mean difference, and 95% confidence interval at alpha .05 level while content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data.

The results revealed the model consisted of 1) principles and reasoning: the goal to strengthen student professional identity. 2) Learning objectives: learning issues by considering course objectives. 3) Subject content consists of 3 parts: the content according to the course curriculum, 21st century skills, mental services, patient ethics, patients’ rights and participation. 4) Teaching and learning activities which has 4 steps, (1) prepare and promote the interest to motivate learners, (2) teaching to create knowledge and new information, (3) summarizing received knowledge, (4) evaluating the results, (5) Measuring and evaluating the teaching and learning model.

The results of the effectiveness of a learning model was 0.8461. The average of professional identity before and after were 133.87 (SD=16.18) and 158.09 (SD=7.33). After deployed intervention, the average score of professional identity was significant raised. (20.14-28.31 95%CI, p-value <.001)


Download data is not yet available.


1. Sumetsittikul, A, Prajankett, O. Identity personality and values: the foundation of professional identity development. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses 2018;19(2):1-7. (in Thai).

2. Suwannachin C, Jantarapanya P. Students’s identity construction in higher education. Panyapiwat Journal 2015;7(2):267-80. (in Thai).

3. Dawangpa, J, Phaktoop M. Quality of nursing care as expected and perceived by social security patients in one private hospital in bangkok. EAU Heritage Journal Scien and Technology 2017;11(2): 215-225. (in Thai).

4. Dick W, Carry L. The Systematic Design of Instruction. Illinois, Scott Foreman and Company; 1989.

5. Joyce B, Weil M. Model of Teaching. 4th ed. Boston, Allyn and Bacon; 1996.

6. Billett S, Harteis C, Gruber H. International handbook of research in professional and practice-based Learning. Springer Dordrecht; 2014.

7. Gibson D, Dollarhide C, Moss J. Professional identity development: a grounded theory of transformational tasks of new counselors. Wiley; 2011.

8. Bonnie K. School psychologists as health-care providers in the 21st century: conceptual framework, professional identity, and professional practice. Journal School Psychology Review 2000;29(4):540-54.

9. Lapkin S, Jones T, Gilligan C. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interprofessional education in health professional programs. Nurse Education Today 2013;33(2):90-102.

10. Lairio M, Puukari S, Kouvo A. Studying at university as part of student life and identity construction. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research 2013;57(2):115-31.

11. Nygaard C, Serrano MB. Student’s identity construction and learning: reasons for developing a learning-centred curriculum in higher education. Journal of Education Research 2009;3(3):233-53.

12. Songwatthanayuth P, Kitsawat S, Sirichot K, Boonlua S. Factors related the characteristics of graduates framework for higher education among nursing students in Prachomklao College of Nursing, Phetchaburi province. Journal of Prachomklao College of Nurses Phetchaburi Province 2018;1(1):57-69. (in Thai).

13. Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons Inc; 1977.

14. Surirak S, Chaktrimongkhol U, Malarat A, Jitarram P. The Synthesis of Graduated Identities Competencies Indicators for Bachelor of Public Health (Community Public Health), Sirindhorn Public Health College, Praboromarajchanok Institute. Journal of Nursing and Education 2017;10(4):76-94. (in Thai).

15. Prachanban, P. Research methodology in social science. Phitsanulok; 2010. (in Thai)



How to Cite

Seedaket S, Chotchai T. Development of a Learning Model to Strengthen Professional Identity among Students of Bachelor of Public Health Program in Community Public Health, Sirindhorn College of Public Health, Praboromarajchanok institute. JHNR [Internet]. 2020 Apr. 1 [cited 2022 Dec. 8];36(1):1-11. Available from:



Research articles