Public Ethics
Editor's roles and responsibilities
1. The editor's decision to "accept" or "reject" the publication of the article It should be based on
the article content that is consistent with the goals, quality, importance, freshness and
clarity of the article. As well as the relation to the scope of the Bamrasnaradura Institute Journal
And plagiarism is strictly checked using a reliable program to ensure that the articles published
in journals do not have plagiarism of others. And if copying of work by others is detected, the process
must be stopped to evaluate the article And contact the author of the article immediately To request
clarification in evaluating the article
2. The editor has the duty to consider publishing the research results with the correct research methodology.
2. The editor has the duty to consider publishing the research results with the correct research methodology.
And give credible results that should be published in the journal Bamrasnaradura Institute?
3. Editors must use academic reasons when considering articles. Without prejudice towards the article
3. Editors must use academic reasons when considering articles. Without prejudice towards the article
and the author in terms of race, gender, religion, culture, politics and the subject of the author
4. Editors must not have conflicts of interest or conflicts of interest with the author or the assessor of the article.
4. Editors must not have conflicts of interest or conflicts of interest with the author or the assessor of the article.
And not use articles or journals for business benefits Or use as their own academic work
5. Editors must not edit or change the content of the article and the evaluation of the article evaluators,
5. Editors must not edit or change the content of the article and the evaluation of the article evaluators,
including not blocking or interfere with the information exchanged between the article evaluators
and authors.
6. The editor must not disclose the information of the author and the evaluator of the article to other people.
6. The editor must not disclose the information of the author and the evaluator of the article to other people.
Not relevant at the time of the article evaluation
7. Editors must follow the process and procedures. Of the Journal of the Bamrasnaradura Institute strictly
8. The editor must maintain the standard of the Bamrasnaradura Institute Journal. Including developing
7. Editors must follow the process and procedures. Of the Journal of the Bamrasnaradura Institute strictly
8. The editor must maintain the standard of the Bamrasnaradura Institute Journal. Including developing
journals to have quality and always up to date
9. Willing to explain the amendment willingly. Enlightenment, withdrawal and apology, if needed
9. Willing to explain the amendment willingly. Enlightenment, withdrawal and apology, if needed
Roles and duties of authors
1. The author must not submit an article that has been published anywhere before. And do not send the
original articles overlap with other journals And the author must not publish or publish the work with other
sources. After being published with the Journal of the Bamrasnaradura Institute
2. The author must specify the name of the source of funding for research (if any) and must specify
2. The author must specify the name of the source of funding for research (if any) and must specify
the conflicts of interest (if any)
3. The faculty name of the essay appearing in the article must be a real participant in this work, namely the
3. The faculty name of the essay appearing in the article must be a real participant in this work, namely the
formulation of conceptual framework for design, study / research, operation and analysis, interpretation of
educational / research results Leading to the article
4. If the article requesting the publication about human trial research The author must provide evidence that
4. If the article requesting the publication about human trial research The author must provide evidence that
the said research proposal Has been approved by the relevant ethics committee.
5. The author does not violate or copy the work of others. And must be referenced every time when presenting
5. The author does not violate or copy the work of others. And must be referenced every time when presenting
the work of others Or referring to the content of one's own article
6. The author must reference the work, image or table if used in their own articles. Which must specify
6. The author must reference the work, image or table if used in their own articles. Which must specify
permission to use "content" content to prevent copyright infringement (If prosecution is the sole
responsibility of the author, the journal will not take any responsibility at all)
7. In the article, the author must not report false information. Whether creating false or misleading information,
7. In the article, the author must not report false information. Whether creating false or misleading information,
including decoration Or choose to display specific information that is consistent with the conclusion
8. A thank you to those who helped in the acknowledgment. If can do The author should request permission
8. A thank you to those who helped in the acknowledgment. If can do The author should request permission
from the person who wishes to thank him first.
Roles and duties of appraiser
1. Article evaluators must consider the quality of the article as the main By considering the articles under
academic principles and reasoning Without prejudice or personal opinions And does not have any
disagreement with the author of the article. I may have a conflict of interest with the author that makes
it impossible to give opinions and suggestions freely. The article appraiser should notify the editor of the
journal. And reject the assessment of that article
2. The article appraiser must not seek to benefit from the academic work that he has considered in evaluating
2. The article appraiser must not seek to benefit from the academic work that he has considered in evaluating
the article and not use some or all of the information in the article to be his own work.
3. The article appraiser should have expertise in the field in which he evaluates the article. By considering the
3. The article appraiser should have expertise in the field in which he evaluates the article. By considering the
importance of the content of the article on that subject The quality of the analysis and the concentration of the
work or specify important research results And consistent with the article being evaluated And the appraiser
should not use personal opinions without supporting information as the basis for judging the article.
4. When the appraiser found that Is there any part of the article that is identical or redundant with other works?
4. When the appraiser found that Is there any part of the article that is identical or redundant with other works?
The appraiser must immediately notify the editor.
5. The article appraiser must maintain the evaluation period according to the evaluation period specified by
5. The article appraiser must maintain the evaluation period according to the evaluation period specified by
the journal.
6. Article evaluators must keep confidentiality. And do not disclose the information of the article submitted
6. Article evaluators must keep confidentiality. And do not disclose the information of the article submitted
for consideration to unrelated persons during the period of the article evaluation.
responsibility
Article published in the Journal of Bamrasnaradura Institute Considered as academic work or research. And analyze as well as personal opinion of the author Not the opinion of the Bamrasnaradura Institute Or editorial department in any way, the author must be responsible for their articles.