The Development of Instructional Design and Development System to Enhance the Humanized Care Behaviors for Students of Faculty of Public Health and Allied Health Sciences, Praboromarajchanok Institute, Ministry of Public Health
การพัฒนาระบบการออกแบบและพัฒนาการเรียนการสอน เพื่อสร้างเสริมพฤติกรรมการให้บริการสุขภาพด้วยหัวใจ ความเป็นมนุษย์ สำหรับนักศึกษาคณะสาธารณสุขศาสตร์ และสหเวชศาสตร์ สถาบันพระบรมราชชนก กระทรวงสาธารณสุข
Keywords:
Instructional Design and Development System, Health Service Provision Humanized Care BehaviorsAbstract
The objectives of this research and development were 1) to study good practices, 2) to
construct the system, and 3) to analyze the results of using the instructional design and development system based on the framework of Service Mind, Analytical thinking, and Participation
(SAP) to enhance humanized care behaviors of students of Faculty of Public Health and Allied
Health Sciences. The population were 642 instructors of Praboromarajchanok Institute and
samples were 222 instructors for knowledhe sharing and 15 instructors for in-depth interview.
The researchers used Taro Yamane table, purposive sampling, and snowball technique. The
seven instructors volunteered for the implementation of this instructional design and development
system. The system was validated by five experts derived from snowball technique. The
instruments used in this study included knowledge sharing issues, an in-depth interviews form,
a guideline, a worksheet, and an evaluation form for design courses and evaluation from for
system validation. Data were collected and analyzed using Content Analysis, Mean, and Index
of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) from the experts.
It has been found that the system consisted of seven components: 1) subject contents
2) learning objectives 3) teaching strategies and activities 4) roles of teachers and learners
5) learning materials and learning resources 6) learning environment and 7) behavioral assessment methods and tools. This system also consisted of five step approach, included 28
sub-steps. It was revealed that overall the instructors could design courses that enhance humanized care behaviors at the highest level (Mean = 2.71). Specifically, the instructors were most
capable of analyzing and writing weekly behavioral objectives (Mean = 2.89), and designing
teaching and learning strategies and activities (Mean = 2.80). The lowest of instructors’ capability was determining learning resources (Mean = 2.60). The system validated by experts was
found appropriate (Mean = 0.96), and was accepted as a very good system (Mean = 3.60)
References
(2019, 5 April). Government Gazette 136, 43,
p40-65. (in Thai)
2. Praboromarajchanok Institute. Strategic Plan of
Praboromarajchanok Institute Medium-term
Strategic Plan 5 years, 2020-2024, Praboromarajchanok institute, 2020. (in Thai)
3. Keawkalayasikkhalai, Educational Development
Section, Praboromarajchanok Institute. The
Learning Experience of Mind Service with the
Human Heart under the Virtual Family System.
Bangkok: Klungnana-wittaya Printing, 2018. (in
Thai)
4. Taro Yamane. Statistics: An Introductory
Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row
Publications, 1973.
5. Natakuatoong, O. Instructional Design System:
System Approach in Education. Nonthaburi:
Sukhothai Thammathirat University, 2020. (in
Thai)
6. Gerlach, V. S. & Ely, D. P. Teaching and Media:
A Systematic Approach. Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc, 1971.
7. Kemp, J. Instructional Design: A Plan for Unit
and Course Development. Belmont, CA:
Fearon Publishers, 1977.
8. Reiser, R. A. What field did you say you were
in? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.).
Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and
Technology. 4th ed. NY: Pearson Education,
Inc., 2017.
9. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. Designing Effective
Instruction. 7th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2012.
10. Seechaliao, T. A Proposed Model of Instructional Design and Development based on
Engineering Creative Problem Solving Principles to Develop Creative Thinking Skills of
Undergraduate Engineering Students. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University, 2008. (in Thai)
11.Thangkabutra, T. Development of A Model of
Blended Learning Instructional Design using
Cognitive Maps to Increase Critical Thinking
Ability for Undergraduate Students. Bangkok:
Chulalongkorn University, 2009. (in Thai)
12. Udomseth, K. Development of A Flipped Learning Instructional Design Model based on
TPACK Framework and Elaboration Theory for
Secondary School Teachers under Office of
the Private Education Commission. Bangkok:
Chulalongkorn University, 2015. (in Thai)
13. Duchastel, P. C. & Merrill, P. F. The Effects of
Behavioral Objectives on Learning: A Review
of Empirical Studies. Review of Educational
Research, 1973; 43(1): 53-69.
14. Office of the Civil Service Commission. A
Manual for Determination of Performance in
Civil Service: Core Competencies Guide. Nonthaburi: Prachum Chang Co.,Ltd., 2010. (in
Thai)
