Effectiveness of a stoma protector for prevention of stomal prolapse and parastomal hernia

Authors

  • Somporn Gornmaek Faculty of Medicine , Prince of Songkla University
  • Arporn Pongsaha Faculty of Medicine , Prince of Songkla University
  • Praneed Songwathana Faculty of Nursing, Prince of Songkla University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/jmu.2022.24

Keywords:

stoma protector, stomal prolapse, parastomal hernia

Abstract

           Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of a SP stoma protector to prevent stomal prolapse and parastomal hernia.

           Material and Methods: A quasi-experimental design, (one group, pre-posttest of an intervention group), using a prototype SP stoma protector consisting of a stoma shield and belt, in 16 patients who had stomal prolapse. Data were collected at the university hospital, in Southern Thailand; from January 2020 to May 2021. The stomal prolapse and parastomal hernias were assessed twice, to compare their effectiveness, before using the SP stoma protector at the clinic, and again after a few days follow-up via telephone.

           Results: The sixteen participants, ages ranging from 8-83 years old (median age being 59), were mainly diagnosed with colorectal cancer (87.5 %) and had a loop stoma (81.3. %). From this, 43.8% of them had a BMI > 23, had received emergency surgery (37.5 %), and had a prolapse after surgery ≤ 90 days (62.5 %). After using the SP stoma protector, it was demonstrated that it could prevent the occurrence of stoma prolapse and parastomal hernia. The participants also felt satisfied with the design, with the highest median score =10, followed by the easy to use and quality; including, that it felt comfortable (median score =8.5).

           Conclusion: The “SP stoma protector” was effective in preventing stomal prolapse and parastomal hernia when applied in the short term. Although, it is easy to use and had no adverse effects, the material might require a higher grade of material for further improvement.

References

Biesenbach H. (2000). Device for covering an artificial intestine exit, in particular, for persons with prolapse problems comprises a central element which is provided with a depression for limited intestine movements. Germany patent DE19900611C1.

Butler DL. (2009). Early postoperative complications following ostomy surgery. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 36 (5), 513-519.

Cesare DJ. (1954). Colostomy appliance. (United States patent US2675002A).

Hubbard G, Taylor C, Munro J, et al. (2019). Experiences of support garments following bowel stoma formation: analysis of free-text responses in a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open Gastro, 6:e000291. doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000291

Kim JT, Kumar RR. (2006). Reoperation for stoma-related complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 19, 207–212.

Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. (2017). Stoma complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 30, 193-200.

Malik T, Lee MJ, Harikrishnan AB. (2018). The incidence of stoma related morbidity –a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 100, 501-508.

Murken DR, Bleier JIS. (2019). Ostomy-related complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 32, 176-182.

National Health Security Office. (2019). Outpatient / Inpatient Information (OP individual, OP/ IP e-claim) UC scheme fiscal year 2012-2016.

Ngamjarus C & Chongsuvivatwong V. (2014). n4Studies: sample size and power calculations for iOS. The Royal Golden Jubilee PhD. Program - The Thailand Research Fund & Prince of Songkla University. Songkla: Prince of Songkla University.

Wayne WD. (1995). Biostatistics: a foundation of analysis in the health sciences (6th ed.). Georgia State University. John Wiley & Sons.

Whealin W. (1991). Ostomy appliances. (United States patent US5125917A).

Wongkhan K. (2017 June, 23). Innovative research model (R&D, D&D, AR, R2R). Lecture Documents, Training Project "Create a new generation of researchers" Available from: http:/www.ubu.ac.th/web/files_up/08f2017060214303228.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-11-25

Issue

Section

Research Articles