Analysis of Antimicrobial Use and Mortality Factors in Patients with Drug-Resistant K. pneumoniae at Mukdahan Hospital

Authors

  • Prapassorn Nonjumjang Mukdahan Hospital

Keywords:

Drug Utilization Evaluation, Antimicrobial Resistance, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs)

Abstract

Purposes: To analyze the situation of carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections and to identify factors associated with mortality in patients infected with drug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Materials and Methods : The study included a total of 149 patients, of whom 42 had infections caused by drug-resistant K. pneumoniae. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of patients with antimicrobial-resistant infections who had received approval for restricted antimicrobial use between January 1 and December 31, 2023. The research instrument was a data collection form, which was validated for content validity (IOC = 0.84). Data analysis employed descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, as well as inferential statistics using the Chi-square test and Independent t-test.

Main findings : Among 149 patients, 51 (34.28%) were infected with carbapenem-susceptible organisms, showing a mortality rate of only 5.88%, with appropriate drug selection in 92.16% and correct dosing in 88.24%. The mean hospital stay in this group was 17.0 ± 10.1 days. In contrast, 98 patients (65.77%) with carbapenem-resistant infections had a significantly higher mortality rate of 25.51%, appropriate drug selection in only 74.49%, and correct dosing in merely 24.49%, with a mean hospital stay of 37.7 ± 29.5 days. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in both mortality (Chi-square test, p = .007) and length of hospital stay (Independent t-test, p < .001). The most common resistant pathogen was carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) (51.01%), while the highest mortality was observed in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) (35.71%). Mortality was significantly associated with the appropriateness of dosing and administration (p = .02). Patients receiving PK/PD-optimized regimens, such as meropenem high-dose prolonged infusion or appropriate colistin loading dose, had lower mortality. The most frequently prescribed regimen was colistin plus meropenem (65.31%) and colistin-related adverse events were observed in 22.78% of cases, mostly nephrotoxicity.

Conclusions and recommendation : Carbapenem-resistant infections are associated with high severity, significantly increased mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Revision of the hospital CPG is warranted, with sulbactam recommended as first-line therapy for CRAB and ceftazidime-avibactam (restricted formulary, category J2) as first-line therapy for CRE where applicable. Updating the Drug Utilization Evaluation (DUE) process is essential to improve treatment outcomes, reduce mortality, and minimize long-term healthcare costs.

 

References

ธรรมลิขิตกุล วิโรจน์. คู่มือการควบคุมและป้องกันแบคทีเรียดื้อยาต้านจุลชีพในโรงพยาบาล [อินเทอร์เน็ต]. กรุงเทพฯ: สถาบันวิจัยระบบสาธารณสุข; 2558 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 17 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://www.hsri.or.th

ทองรอด วิโรจน์. Antimicrobial resistance: การดื้อยาของเชื้อโรค [อินเทอร์เน็ต]. 2565 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 17 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: http://ccpe.pharmacycouncil.org

Musicha P, Cornick J E, Bar-Zeev N, French N, Masesa C, Denis B, et al. Trends in antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infection isolates at a large urban hospital in Malawi (1998–2016): a surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(10):1042–52.

รัตนอัมพวัลย์ ภูริเดช. การส่งเสริมและกำกับการใช้ยาต้านจุลชีพอย่างเหมาะสมในโรงพยาบาล. กรุงเทพฯ: เรือนแก้วการพิมพ์; 2561.

National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Center Thailand (NARST). Antimicrobial resistance 2000–2016 [Internet]. Bangkok: Department of Medical Sciences; 2017 [cited 2025 Feb 17]. Available from: http://narst.dmsc.moph.go.th

กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์. สถานการณ์เชื้อดื้อยาต้านจุลชีพ 2000–2018 [Internet]. กรุงเทพฯ: กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์; 2561 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 17 กุมภาพันธ์ 2568]. เข้าถึงได้จาก:http://narst.dmsc.moph.go.th

Kaye K S, Pogue J M. Infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria: epidemiology and management. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(10):949–62.

Thamlikitkul V, Rattanaumpawan P, Boonyasiri A, Pumsuwan V, Judaeng T, Tiengrim S, et al. Thailand antimicrobial resistance containment and prevention program. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2015;3(4):290–4.

Hsu L Y, Alder J, Kwa A L, Tam V H, Kurup A, Teng C B. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a review of treatment and outcomes. Antibiotics (Basel). 2017;6(4):25.

ยิ่งขจร สุนทร, สุทธิโชติ สมชาย, หงส์ทอง นฤมล, บุญรอด ตรีทศ, สิมลา วัฒนา, ศีรรักษา ศุภชัย. การดื้อยาปฏิชีวนะของแบคทีเรียในโรงพยาบาล. วารสารวิชาการสาธารณสุข. 2564;30(9):16–27.

บัวชุม สมเกียรติ, โจวตระกูล ไพศาล, วงพระจันทร์ สมพร. ปัจจัยที่มีความสัมพันธ์กับการติดเชื้อแบคทีเรียกลุ่ม Enterobacteriaceae ที่ดื้อต่อยา carbapenem ในผู้ป่วยโรงพยาบาลพิจิตร. วารสารวิจัยและวิชาการสาธารณสุขจังหวัดพิจิตร. 2563;1:3–14.

Tamma P D, Aitken S L, Bonomo R A, Mathers A J, van Duin D, Clancy C J. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(7):e39–110.

Tamma P D, Aitken S L, Bonomo R A, Mathers A J, van Duin D, Clancy C J. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative infections: 2024 update. Clin Infect Dis. 2024;79(9):E65–75.

Paul M, Daikos G L, Durante-Mangoni E, Yahav D, Carmeli Y, Carrara E, et al. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(4):521–47.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-06

How to Cite

1.
Nonjumjang P. Analysis of Antimicrobial Use and Mortality Factors in Patients with Drug-Resistant K. pneumoniae at Mukdahan Hospital. J Res Health Inno Dev [internet]. 2025 Oct. 6 [cited 2026 Feb. 28];6(3):223-3. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jrhi/article/view/283026