การตรวจการปนเปื้อนเชื้อแบคทีเรียของ Laryngoscope

Authors

  • Supath Srithanyarat Roi-Et Hospital

Keywords:

Contamination, Bacteria, Laryngoscope

Abstract

Purpose: To study the contamination of bacteria on Laryngoscope at Roi Et Hospital.

Design: Survey Research

Materials and Methods:  Swab sample of 11 handle laryngoscope and 31 laryngoscope blade at Department of Anesthesiology and culture at microbiology Roi Et Hospital during April 1, 2019 to May 29, 2019.

Main Findings: Laryngoscope of the Operation Room No1. found Bacillus spp. in Handle and found Gram positive bacilli unidentified , Bacillus spp. in Blade.  The Operation Room No2. found Coagulase negative staphylococci. in Handle and Bacillus spp. in Blade.          The Operation Room No3. found Coagulase negative staphylococci. in Handle and Gram positive bacilli unidentified in Blade. The Operation Room No4. found Bacillus spp. in Blade.  The Operation Room No5. found Bacillus spp. in Handle and found Gram positive bacilli unidentified  in Blade. The Operation Room No6. not found any bacteria in Handle and Blade. The Recovery Room 3 floor found Coagulase negative staphylococci. in Handle and found Bacillus spp. , Gram positive bacilli unidentified in Blade.  The Operation Room No7. found Bacillus spp. in Handle not found bacteria in Blade. The Operation Room No8. Found Bacillus spp. in Handle and found Bacillus spp., Micrococcus spp. in Blade. The Operation Room No9. found Enterococcus faecium in Handle and not found bacteria in Blade  and the CVT operation Room not found bacteria in Handle but found  Micrococcus spp. in Blade

Conclusion and recommendations:  this study revealed that laryngoscope Blade and Handle found bacteria contamination. The appropriate cleansing process can destroy the bacteria contamination on laryngoscope.

References

1. Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Jamulitrat S, Medeiros EA, Todi SK, Gomez DY, et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary for 2003-2008, issued June 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2010 Mar;38(2):95–104.e2.
2. Danchaivijitr S, Dhiraputra C, Santiprasitkul S, Judaeng T. Prevalence and impacts of nosocomial infection in Thailand 2001. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(Suppl 10):S1–9.
3. Danchaivijitr S, Judaeng T, Sripalakij S, Naksawas K, Plipat T. Prevalence of nosocomial infection in Thailand 2006. J-Med Assoc Thail. 2007;90(8):1524.
4. Dejsirilert S, Suankratay C, Trakulsomboon S, Thongmali O, Sawanpanyalert P, Aswapokee N, et al. National Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance, Thailand (NARST) data among clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Thailand from 2000 to 2005. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2009 Aug;92 Suppl 4:S68-75.
5. Petdachai W. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in a newborn intensive care unit. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004 Sep;35(3):724–9.
6. Bayani M, Siadati S, Rajabnia R, Taher AA. Drug Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter cloacae Isolated from ICU, Babol, Northern Iran. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2013;2(4):204–9.
7. Gurung J, Khyriem AB, Banik A, Lyngdoh WV, Choudhury B, Bhattacharyya P. Association of biofilm production with multidrug resistance among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med Peer-Rev Off Publ Indian Soc Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;17(4):214–8.
8. Rhodes D, Cheng AC, McLellan S, Guerra P, Karanfilovska D, Aitchison S, et al. Reducing Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections associated with peripheral intravenous cannulae: successful implementation of a care bundle at a large Australian health service. J Hosp Infect. 2016 Jun 7;
9. Nuvials X, Palomar M, Alvarez-Lerma F, Olaechea P, Otero S, Uriona S, et al. Primary bacteriemia and catheter related bloodstream infection in patients admitted to ICU. risk factors associated with mortality. ENVIN-HELICS registry data. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015 Dec;3(Suppl 1):A889.
10. Sader HS, Castanheira M, Flamm RK, Mendes RE, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. Ceftazidime/avibactam tested against Gram-negative bacteria from intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU patients, including those with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Jul;46(1):53–9.
11. Tumbarello M, De Pascale G, Trecarichi EM, Spanu T, Antonicelli F, Maviglia R, et al. Clinical outcomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia in intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Apr;39(4):682–92.
12. Espinar MJ, Miranda IM, Costa-de-Oliveira S, Rocha R, Rodrigues AG, Pina-Vaz C. Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Transplant Patients Due to Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae-Producing Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases: Risk Factors and Molecular Epidemiology. PloS One. 2015;10(8):e0134737.
13. Nakai H, Hagihara M, Kato H, Hirai J, Nishiyama N, Koizumi Y, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Infect Chemother Off J Jpn Soc Chemother. 2016 May;22(5):319–26.
14. Chopra T, Marchaim D, Johnson PC, Chalana IK, Tamam Z, Mohammed M, et al. Risk factors for bloodstream infection caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: A focus on antimicrobials including cefepime. Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jul 1;43(7):719–23.
15. Søraas A, Sundsfjord A, Sandven I, Brunborg C, Jenum PA. Risk factors for community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae--a case-control study in a low prevalence country. PloS One. 2013;8(7):e69581.
16. Superti SV, Augusti G, Zavascki AP. Risk factors for and mortality of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli nosocomial bloodstream infections. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2009 Aug;51(4):211–6.
17. Mosqueda-Gómez JL, Montaño-Loza A, Rolón AL, Cervantes C, Bobadilla-del-Valle JM, Silva-Sánchez J, et al. Molecular epidemiology and risk factors of bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae A case-control study. Int J Infect Dis IJID Off Publ Int Soc Infect Dis. 2008 Nov;12(6):653–9.
18. Tr C, Fj A, Sw R, Dl K, Sc T, Sw T, et al. Nosocomial Contamination of Laryngoscope Handles: Challenging Current Guidelines [Internet]. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2009 [cited 2020 May 25]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19608822/
19. D W, J D, C J, N B. Contamination of Laryngoscope Handles [Internet]. The Journal of hospital infection. 2010 [cited 2020 May 25]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20096953/
20. Rme T, Aa W, Fa A, Rha B, Jm B. Pattern of Anaesthetic Equipment Contamination and Infection Prevention in Anaesthesia Practice at University Hospitals [Internet]. Indian journal of anaesthesia. 2018 [cited 2020 May 25]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30443062/

Downloads

Published

2020-02-28

How to Cite

1.
Srithanyarat S. การตรวจการปนเปื้อนเชื้อแบคทีเรียของ Laryngoscope. J Res Health Inno Dev [internet]. 2020 Feb. 28 [cited 2026 Jan. 27];1(2):107-14. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jrhi/article/view/253653

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Vol.1 no-2.(2020)February - May 2020

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Roi-Et Provincial Public Health office

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ สำนักงานสาธารณสุขจังหวัดร้อยเอ็ด

บทความที่ลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารวิจัย และพัฒนานวัตกรรมทางสุขภาพ สํานักงานสาธารณสุขจังหวัดร้อยเอ็ด ถือเป็น ผลงานวิชาการ งานวิจัย วิเคราะห์ ตลอดจนเป็นความเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้ประพันธ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่จําเป็นต้องเห็น ด้วยเสมอไป และผู้ประพันธ์จะต้องรับผิดชอบต่อบทความของตนเอง