The Differences of Perception of Asymmetry on Chin and Lip in Facial Asymmetry Patients Rated by Laypersons and Orthodontists
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The perception of facial asymmetry plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the perception of chin deviation and lip canting and to compare the differences in perception between laypersons and orthodontists. Materials and methods: Fifty-five new patients presenting with facial asymmetry were examined. Subjects were categorized into four groups based on the severity of chin deviation and lip canting. Three-dimensional (3D) facial images and corresponding mirror images were generated. A total of twenty-six laypersons and orthodontists were asked to compare the original and mirror images, after which they categorized the asymmetry into three levels: normal, acceptable, and unacceptable. Results: For chin deviations of 0–2 mm, laypersons generally perceived the asymmetry as normal, while orthodontists classified it as either normal or acceptable. In cases of chin deviation exceeding 2–4 mm, laypersons tended to rate it as acceptable, whereas orthodontists judged it as unacceptable. When the chin deviation exceeded 4 mm, both groups perceived it as unacceptable. Regarding lip canting of 0–1 mm, both laypersons and orthodontists classified it as normal. When lip canting increased to over 1–2 mm, laypersons still considered it normal, while orthodontists classified it as acceptable. Lip canting exceeding 2–3 mm was generally perceived by both groups as acceptable, and canting greater than 3 mm was considered unacceptable by both laypersons and orthodontists. Conclusion: Orthodontists exhibited greater sensitivity than laypersons in perceiving both chin deviation and lip canting.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Haraguchi S, Takada K, Yasuda Y. Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. Angle Orthod 2002;72(1):28-35.
Jacobson A. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113(6):697-8.
Manosudprasit M, Manosudprasit A, Manosudprasit A, Traisrisin K. Dentofacial asymmetry: a literature review. J Med Assoc Thai 2017;100(Suppl 6):S50-60.
Thiesen G, Gribel BF, Freitas MP. Facial asymmetry: a current review. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20(6):110-25.
Masuoka N, Muramatsu A, Ariji Y, Nawa H, Goto S, Ariji E. Discriminative thresholds of cephalometric indexes in the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(5):609-13.
McAvinchey G, Maxim F, Nix B, Djordjevic J, Linklater R, Landini G. The perception of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional simulated images. Angle Orthod 2014;84(6):957-65.
Lee MS, Chung DH, Lee J-w, Cha K-s. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138(1):23-31.
Kim H, Hwang HS. Frontal cephalogram study on the natural head position of facial asymmetry patients. Korean J Orthod 2000;30:535-42.
Kaipainen AE, Sieber KR, Nada RM, Maal TJ, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face. Eur J Orthod 2016;38(6):602-8.
Lee SF, Dumrongwongsiri S, Lo LJ. Perception of lip cant as a sign of facial deformity: assessment by laypersons and professionals on composite face photographs. Ann Plast Surg 2019;82(1S Suppl 1):S140-3.
Sakunteo P, Nisalak P, Verayangkura P, Charoenying H, Pongpirul K. Frontal symmetrical facial esthetic perception and treatment judgements: the differences among dental professionals, orthodontic patients and laypeople. Bangkok: Mahidol University; 2006.
Van Keulen C, Martens G, Dermaut L. Unilateral posterior crossbite and chin deviation: is there a correlation? Eur J Orthod 2004;26(3):283-8.
Jarosz KF, Bosio JA, Bloomstein R, Jiang SS, Vakharia NS, Cangialosi TJ. Perceptions of chin asymmetries among dental professionals and laypersons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018;154(2):201-12.
Zhang M, Lyu L, Li J, Yan H, Zhu Y, Yu T, et al. Subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry with three-dimensional simulated images among the orthodontists and laypersons: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2023;23(1):500.
Kim EJ, Palomo JM, Kim SS, Lim HJ, Lee KM, Hwang HS. Maxillofacial characteristics affecting chin deviation between mandibular retrusion and prognathism patients. Angle Orthod 2011;81(6):988-93.
Choi J, Kim S-D, Cho J-H, Kim S-H, Kim† M-S. Evaluation of the perception of lip-line canting. Korean J Oral Anatomy 2020;41(1):21-8.
Samman N, Tong AC, Cheung DL, Tideman H. Analysis of 300 dentofacial deformities in Hong Kong. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1992;7(3):181-5.
Severt TR, Proffit WR. The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1997;12(3):171-6.
Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, Ren Y. Evaluation of anthropometric accuracy and reliability using different three-dimensional scanning systems. Forensic Sci Int 2011;207(1-3):127-34.
Patel A, Islam SM, Murray K, Goonewardene MS. Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging. Prog Orthod 2015;16:36.
Reddy MR, Bogavilli SR, Raghavendra V, Polina VS, Basha SZ, Preetham R. Prevalence of facial asymmetry in Tirupati population: a posteroanterior cephalometric and photographic study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016;6(Suppl 3):S205-12.