Survival Rate of Lung Cancer Patients after Diagnosis at the National Cancer Institute: An Update from the National Cancer Institute Hospital Based Cancer Registry between 2020 and 2024

Main Article Content

Atit Leklob
Rangsriya Buasom

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Thailand and globally, particularly among patients diagnosed at an advanced stage. This study aimed to evaluate mortality rates, survival rates, and compare these among groups of lung cancer patients receiving treatment at the National Cancer Institute. The specific objectives were: (1) to evaluate the overall survival rate, survival time, and survival trends of lung cancer patients diagnosed and treated at the National Cancer Institute between 2020 and 2024; (2) to analyze and compare survival stratified by key variables including sex, age, cancer cell type, and disease stage; and (3) to determine survival trends for patients in each stage of the disease. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the cancer registry database of the National Cancer Institute between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024. A total of 1,325 patients diagnosed with lung cancer (ICD-O-3: C33.9, C34.0–C34.9) were included. Vital status was followed up by linking with the mortality database of the National Health Security Office. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method on 1,312 patients with complete data, with death as the event of interest. Differences in survival between groups were compared using the log-rank test. Median survival times were reported alongside 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among the 1,325 patients, 56.53% were male with a mean age of 63.3 ± 11.1 years, and 43.47% were female with a mean age of 62.8 ± 11.8 years. The majority had non-small cell lung cancer (96.23%) and were diagnosed at stage IV (61.96%). There were 338 deaths observed, corresponding to a mortality rate of 25.51 per 100 person-years. The overall median survival time was 0.93 years (95% CI: 0.81–1.03), indicating that half of the patients died within approximately 11 months after diagnosis. The survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 48.2%, 30.9%, 24.2%, 17.4%, and 12.9%, respectively. When stratified by sex, females had a significantly higher median survival of 1.38 years (95% CI: 1.15–1.58) compared to males, who had a median survival of 0.68 years (95% CI: 0.59–0.80). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for females were 57.4%, 28.8%, and 19.7%, whereas for males, they were 41.1%, 20.6%, and 6.2%, respectively. When stratified by disease stage, prominent differences in survival were observed. stage II had a median survival of 4.60 years (95% CI: 3.08–upper limit not estimable), stage III was 1.25 years (95% CI: 0.99–1.69), and stage IV was 0.63 years (95% CI: 0.56–0.74). Kaplan-Meier trends demonstrated that patients in stage I-II experienced consistently higher survival, whereas stage IV showed a rapid decline in survival beginning in the first year. Conclusion: The majority of lung cancer patients were diagnosed at an advanced stage and exhibited a median survival of less than 1 year. Sex and disease stage were significantly associated with survival, with males and advanced-stage patients having a poor prognosis. The findings of this study reflect the critical need to improve early detection and increase access to effective treatments to reduce the mortality rate. 

Article Details

Section
Original Articles

References

International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022.

Imsamran W, Pattatang A, Supattagorn P, et al. Cancer in Thailand. Vol. X, 2016–2018. Bangkok: National Cancer Institute; 2021.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.

Islami F, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global trends of lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4(4):327-38.

Loomis D, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, et al. The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution and particulate matter. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1262-3.

Mok TS, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):947-57.

Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823-33.

Khiewvan B, Tungsukruthai S, Sathitruangsak C, et al. Survival rate of lung cancer patients at Srinagarind Hospital. Srinagarind Med J. 2019;34(2):107-14.

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Version 2023. Plymouth Meeting (PA): National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2023.

Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al., editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer; 2017.

National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Lung and Bronchus Cancer [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2023 [cited 2026 Jun 17]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html

Shigematsu H, Lin L, Takahashi T, et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(5):339-46.

Pinto JA, Vallejos CS, Raez LE, et al. Gender and outcomes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: an old prognostic variable comes back for targeted therapy and immunotherapy? ESMO Open. 2018;3(3):e000344.

US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(10):962-70.

Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53(282):457-81.

Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1972;34(2):187-220.