Suitable Frequency of Patient Position Check for Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Radiotherapy

Authors

  • Thida Niyomthai Radiotherapy Department, National Cancer Institute
  • Phuwasit Wararatrueangwut Radiotherapy Department, National Cancer Institute
  • Ratchadaporn Prasertsom Radiotherapy Department, National Cancer Institute
  • Kanthong Chaimongkol Radiotherapy Department, National Cancer Institute
  • Orathai Singusaha Radiotherapy Department, National Cancer Institute
  • Nopsawat Takang Radiotherapy Department, National Cancer Institute
  • Somchai Thanasitthichai Research and Technology Assessment Department, National Cancer Institute
  • Attasit Srisubat Research and Technology Assessment Institute, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health
  • Chittiporn Nuanlong Research and Technology Assessment Department, National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Radiotherapy is often used in head and neck cancer for complete cure through palliative care. The physical complex and purpose of treatment cannot focus only on complete cure, but must also consider the quality of life of patients during treatment and post-treatment. Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has been used to improve the precision and accuracy of treatment, to reduce the exposure of healthy tissues during radiation treatments and thereby reduce complications from surrounding tissue damage. This qualitative research aimed to study the appropriate frequency of patient position check for head and neck cancer with radiotherapy, using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Radiographic verification was performed on 45 patients at 236 examination times, to check the positional accuracy of the anterior lower neck and the lateral face and neck in different directions. The radiotherapy image was checked once a week to compare different skull and spine positions (bony landmarks), and bodyweight was also recorded. Weight loss or gain during the treatment course was not consistent. The patient positioning errors at a variability of 0.5 cm or more occurred in 42 of 472 examinations (8.9%). The errors were found 20, 12, and 10 times in the first, second, and third verifications, accounting for 47.62%, 28.57%, and 23.81%, respectively. The largest offsets occurred in the left and right sides of the anterior lower neck field. It is suggested that image verification should be performed first in the anterior lower neck position in both the left and right sides to achieve the maximum benefit of controlling the essential dose and decreasing workload. The need for individual additional verification should be considered at the discretion of the doctor and physicist.

References

Side effects of radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. Available at: http://dribrook.blogspot.com/p/radiation-side-effects.html. Accessed November 26, 2015.

Munshi A, Pandey MB, Durga T, Pandey KC, Bahadur S, Mohanti BK. Weight loss during radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies: what factors impact it?. Nutr Cancer 2003;47:136-40.

Langius JA, van Dij AM, Doornaert P, Kruizenga HM, Langendijk JA, Leemans CR, et al. More than 10% weight loss in head and neck cancer patients during radiotherapy is dependently associated with deterioration in quality of life. Nutr Cancer 2013;65:76-83.

Sandra O, Bjorn Z, Elisabeth K, Per N, Goran L. Weight loss in patients with head and neck cancer during and after conventional and accelerated radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2013;52:711-8.

Kang H, Lovelock DM, Yorke ED, Kriminski S, Lee N, Amols HI. Accurate positioning for head and neck cancer patients using 2D and 3D image guidance. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010;12:3270.

On target: ensuring geometric accuracy in radiotherapy. A joint report published by the Society and college of Radiographers, the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and The Royal College of Radiologists. Available at: http://www.rcr.ac.uk/pubications.aspx?PageID=149&PublicationID=292. Accessed July 3, 2014.

National Cancer Action Team. National radiotherapy implementation group report. Image Guided radiotherapy (IGRT): Guidance for implementation and use. London: NCAT, 2012. Available at: https://www.sor.org/sites/default/files/document-versions/National%20Radiotherapy%20Implementation %20Group%20Report%20IGRT%20Final.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2014.

Sterzing F, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Flentje M, Debus J. Image-guided radiotherapy: a new dimension in radiation oncology. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011;108:274-80.

Gupta T, Narayan CA. Image-guided radiation therapy: Physician's perspectives. J Med Phys 2012;37:174-82.

Su J, Chen W, Yang H, Hong J, Zhang Z, Yang G, et al. Different setup errors assessed by weekly conebeam computed tomography on different registration in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Onco Targets Ther 2015;8:2545-53.

Zhang L, Garden AS, Lo J, Ang KK, Ahamad A, Morrison WH, et al. Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:1559-69.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-30

Issue

Section

Original Articles