Factors Related to Active Learning Management of Nursing Students

Authors

  • Pasinee Thoin Boromarajonani College of Nursing Khon Kaen, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute
  • Siriorn Khoyun Boromarajonani College of Nursing Udon thani, Udonthani, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute
  • Phattnee Srioad Boromarajonani College of Nursing Khon Kaen, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute
  • Benjawan Kitkhaundee Boromarajonani College of Nursing Udon thani, Udonthani, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajchanok Institute

Keywords:

factors related to, active learning, nursing students

Abstract

 This descriptive research aimed to study nursing students’ attitudes toward active learning and to examine the relationship between various factors, including the classroom environment, teaching media, teaching activities, and instructors. The sample consisted of 218 nursing students from Boromarajonani College of Nursing, ranging from the 1st to 4th year in the academic year 2024. The research instrument was a questionnaire assessing nursing students’ attitudes toward active learning and the factors related to these attitudes. The content validity of the questionnaire, resulting in a content consistency index of 0.67 to 1. The reliability of the questionnaire was determined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, yielding a reliability score of 0.97. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient.
The research findings indicated that: 1) Nursing students had a high level of positive attitudes towards active learning (Mean = 3.72, S.D. = 0.61). 2) Factors such as teaching activities, instructors, teaching media, and classroom environment had statistically significant positive relationships with students’ attitudes toward active learning, with correlation coefficients (r= 0.63., 0.61, 0.53 and 0.43, respectively), with a p-value of <0.001.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Poohongthong C. Transformative learning: Challenges for instructors in higher education. Journal of Behavioral Science. 2018;24(1): 163-82. (in Thai)

Panich, V. 21st century skill: Rethinking how students learn. Journal of Learning Innovation. 2015;1(2):1-12. (in Thai).

Settles B. From theories to queries: Active Learning in Practice. In Active learning and experimental design workshop in conjunction with International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 2010. Journal of Machine Learning Research Workshop and Conference Proceedings. 2011;15:1-8.

Vinitasatitkun P, & Yaemkwanyuen C. Active learning: guidelines for best practice in the 21st century. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research. 2022;6(3):921-33. (in Thai)

Brame C. Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching; 2016.

Kaewngam A, Chatwattana P, & Piriyasurawong P. Supply chain management model in digital quality assurance for ASEAN university Network Quality Assurance (AUN-QA). Higher education studies. 2019;9(4):12-20. (in Thai)

Suwanjaroen J, Sarakshetrin A, & Malai C. Teaching models to enhance the 21st century skills for bachelor’s degree nursing students. Nursing Journal. 2017; 44(4):177-88. (in Thai)

Intawee T. The causal factors affecting students’ active learning in active learning. Journal of Educational Innovation and Research. 2020;4(3):383-94. (in Thai)

Yamane T. Statistics: an introductory analysis. Tokyo: Aoyama Gakuin University; 1973.

Wijitwanna S. Correlation in statistics: how to use. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rajapruk University. 2022;8(2):1–15. (in Thai)

Dechphongsumrit A, Sutthiponpaisal T, & Jitsangworn W. Development of learning on active learning to enhance critical thinking for students for the students for the 21st’s century. Journal of Science and Technology, Southeast Bangkok University. 2023;3(1):40-52. (in Thai)

Sapeni MAAR, & Said S. The effectiveness of case-based learning in increasing critical thinking of nursing students: A literature review. Enfermería Clínica. 2020;30(2):182-5.

Radabutr M, Thanirat S, & Pinyomit S. Perceptions and experiences of nursing students in Boromarajonani College of Nursing Changwat Nonthaburi regarding active learning. Journal of the Royal Thai Army Nurse 2019; 20(3): 144-53. (in Thai)

Michel N, Cater JJ, & Varela O. Active versus passive teaching styles: An empirical study of student learning outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2009;20(4):397-418.

Chiewsothon S, Nuilers Y, & Chaleoykitti S. The effect of using augmented reality learning management among the Royal Thai Army nursing students toward learning skills in the 21st century. Journal of Prachomklao College of Nursing, Phetchaburi Province. 2021;4(3):152-63. (in Thai)

Jiwtan P, & Limsuwat A. A study of opinion and satisfaction of students of active learning teaching and Improvement of Smart Classroom Development of Suranaree University of Technology. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Mahasarakham University 2020;40(3):65-77. (in Thai)

Wongpibool P. Active learning. Journal of Yanasangvorn Research Institute Mahamakut Buddhist University. 2017;8(2):327–36. (in Thai).

Downloads

Published

04-12-2025

How to Cite

1.
Thoin P, Khoyun S, Srioad P, Kitkhaundee B. Factors Related to Active Learning Management of Nursing Students. J Royal Thai Army Nurses [internet]. 2025 Dec. 4 [cited 2025 Dec. 8];26(3):398-404. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/279902

Issue

Section

Research Articles