Development of Program to Enhance Working Memory Through Narrative Therapy Among Primary School Students

Authors

  • Areerat Leelukharanon Department of Research and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Education, Burapha University
  • Juthamas Haenjohn Department of Research and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Education, Burapha University
  • Warakorn Supwirapakorn Department of Research and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Education, Burapha University

Keywords:

Narrative Therapy, Working Memory Enhancement Program, Third Primary Students, Multicomponent Model of Working Memory

Abstract

 This quasi-experimental study aimed to develop and examine the effects of a program designed to enhance working memory through narrative therapy among primary school students. The participants were 24 third-grade students selected through simple random sampling. Using a matched-pair design based on their working memory scores, the students were randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group, with 12 students in each group. The research instrument was a working memory enhancement program developed by the researcher, grounded in narrative theory and Multicomponent Model of Working Memory. The program was validated by five experts and revised following a pilot study prior to implementation. Data collection tools included the Corsi block test (CSBT), Forward digit span test (FWDT), Backward digit span test (BWDT) and One-back task (1BT). Data were collected in three phases: pre-test, post-test, and a four-week follow-up. Analyses were conducted using repeated-measures analysis of variance (with one between-subject and one within-subject variable), with pairwise comparisons using the Bonferroni method. The results indicated that the experimental group showed statistically significant higher working memory scores at both post-test and follow-up compared to the pre-test (P < .05). These findings suggest that the working memory enhancement program based on narrative theory can effectively improve working memory in primary school students and could be applied in educational contexts. Further research is recommended to evaluate long-term effects and broader implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013; 64(1): 135-68. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.

Haenjohn J. Cognitive psychology. 3rd ed. Bangkok: Grandpoint; 2021. (in Thai)

Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000; 4(11): 417–23. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.

Rao PS, Pandey MK, Mishra P, Deshmukh S, Jahan M, & Manohar JS. Is training working memory in children with learning disabilities a viable solution? A systematic review. Annals of Neurosciences. 2024; 31(2): 124–31. doi: 10.1177/09727531231198639.

Shaban A, Chang V, Amodu OD, Attia MR, & Abdelhamid GSM. A systematic review of working memory applications for children with learning difficulties: transfer outcomes and design principles. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(11): 1-20.doi:10.3390/educsci14111260.

Cowan N. Working memory capacity. New York (NY): Psychology Press; 2005.

Gray S, Fox AB, Green S, Alt M, Hogan TP, Petscher Y, & Cowan N. Working memory profiles of children with dyslexia, developmental language disorder, or both. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2019; 62(6): 1839-58. doi:10.1044/2019_JSLHRL-18-0148.

Chaldogeridis A, & Tsiatsos T. Implementation and evaluation of a serious game for working memory enhancement. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(24): 1-16 doi:10.3390/app10249128.

Ruksawong P, Haenjohn J, & Sirithadakunlaphat S. A development of visual imagery based on Gestalt training program in elementary school students. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2020; 21(1): 302–8. (in Thai)

Anumat P, Haenjohn J, & Supwirapong W. The effects of working memory training program on senior high school students. Journal of Educational Measurement Mahasarakham University. 2018; 24(2): 143–52. (in Thai)

Punpoem N, Haenjohn J, & Supwirapakorn W. Delay dementia in the elderly: a working memory training program based on acceptance and commitment therapy. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2023; 23(3): 428-37. (in Thai)

Ramezani M, Behzadipour S, Pourghayoomi E, Joghataei MT, Shirazi E, & Fawcett AJ. Evaluating a new verbal working memorybalance program: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial study on Iranian children with dyslexia. BMC Neuroscience. 2021; 22(1): 1-17. doi:10.1186/s12868-021-00660-1.

Stadler M, & Ward G. Supporting the narrative development of young children. Early Childhood Education Journal. 2005;33(2): 73–80. doi:10.1007/s10643-005-0024-4.

Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cole M, John-Steiner V, Scribner S, Souberman E, editors. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1978. doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.

Pauls LJ, & Archibald LM. Cognitive and linguistic effects of narrative-based language intervention in children with developmental language disorder. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments. 2021; 6. doi:10.1177/23969415211015867.

Veraksa A, Bukhalenkova D, Kartushina N, & Oshchepkova E. The relationship between executive functions and language production in 5–6-year-old children: Insights from working memory and storytelling. Behavioral Sciences. 2020; 10(2): 1-12. doi:10.3390/bs10020052.

Ekinci N, & Tokkaş BG. A systematic review of narrative therapy. Current Approaches in Psychiatry. 2024; 16(1): 58-71. doi:10.18863/pgy.1256695.

Kejani M, & Raeisi Z. The effect of drama therapy on working memory and its components in primary school children with ADHD. Current Psychology. 2022; 41(1): 417–26. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00564-8.

Jørgensen C, Behrmann J, Blaabjerg J, Pettersen K, & López K. Narrative therapy with children: a qualitative interview study with Danish therapists about the application of narrative practices. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2024; 24(1): 295–307.

White M, & Epston D. Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: WW Norton; 1990.

Mueller ST. PEBL: The Psychology Experiment Building Language. Version 2.1. 2019.

Piper BJ, Mueller ST, Geerken AR, Dixon KL, Kroliczak G, Olsen RH, & Miller JK. Reliability and validity of neurobehavioral function on the Psychology Experimental Building Language test battery in young adults. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1460. doi:10.7717/peerj.1460.

Ren Z, Zhang Y, He H, Feng Q, Bi T, & Qiu J. The different brain mechanisms of object and spatial working memory: voxel-based morphometry and resting-state functional connectivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019;13(248): 1-9.doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00248.

Jääskeläinen IP, Klucharev V, Panidi K, & Shestakova AN. Neural processing of narratives: from individual processing to viral propagation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020; 14(253): 1-9. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00253.

Downloads

Published

04-12-2025

How to Cite

1.
Leelukharanon A, Haenjohn J, Supwirapakorn W. Development of Program to Enhance Working Memory Through Narrative Therapy Among Primary School Students. J Royal Thai Army Nurses [internet]. 2025 Dec. 4 [cited 2025 Dec. 6];26(3):378-86. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/279986

Issue

Section

Research Articles