External Validation of a Prognostic Model for Predicting 24-Hour Mortality in Patients with Severe Septic Shock Presenting to the Emergency Department of Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Hospital

Authors

  • Sorasit Punyavirocha Department of Emergency Medicine, Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Hospital

Keywords:

septic shock, prediction, mortality, risk, validation

Abstract

Objective: To validate the accuracy of a 10-variable prediction model for 24-hour mortality in patients diagnosed with septic shock presenting to the ED of Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Hospital. Methods: This was a prognostic prediction study in the external validation phase, utilizing a retrospective cohort design. Medical records from 2023–2024 were reviewed for patients aged over 18 years who were diagnosed with septic shock (ICD-10: R57.2) upon presentation to the ED. Inclusion required clinical documentation indicating shock due to suspected or confirmed infection in any organ system. Patient outcomes were compared between those who died within 24 hours and those who survived beyond 24 hours. Data were analyzed in two cohorts: derivation data (2018–2022, n=602) and validation data (2023–2024, n=216). Group comparisons were conducted using exact probability tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Model discrimination was evaluated using the c-statistic in both datasets. Mortality risk was stratified based on total scores into three categories: low (0–27.5 points), moderate (28.0–31.0 points), and high (31.5–37.5 points) according to the original model. The 24-hour mortality rate in each risk group was assessed in both datasets. Results: C-statistics were 0.79 for the derivation cohort and 0.69 for the validation cohort. Four of the ten model variables showed statistically significant differences between the two datasets: diastolic blood pressure, pH, phosphorus, and albumin. The observed 24-hour mortality rates by risk category were as follows: https://shorturl.asia/YfM4C Conclusion: The model demonstrated reduced predictive performance in the 2023–2024 validation dataset (c-statistic < 0.7). These findings suggest the need for periodic recalibration or revision of the model coefficients and/or risk threshold scores to maintain accuracy in predicting 24-hour mortality among septic shock patients. Finally, if the model can no longer maintain adequate predictive performance, it should be recalibrated or redeveloped by re-evaluating and incorporating the relevant input variables.

References

Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, Preissing F, Stiefel J, Adam D. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2020;24(1):239.

Gavelli F, Castello LM, Avanzi GC. Management of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med 2021;16(6):1649–61.

กลุ่มงานสารสนเทศและคอมพิวเตอร์ โรงพยาบาลพระนครศรีอยุธยา. ข้อมูลผู้ป่วย admission 2561-2565. พระนครศรีอยุธยา: โรงพยาบาลพระนครศรีอยุธยา; 2566.

สรสิทธิ์ บุณยะวิโรจ. คะแนนทำนายการเสียชีวิตภายใน 24 ชั่วโมง ในผู้ป่วยที่มีภาวะช็อกจากการติดเชื้อในกระแสเลือดรุนแรง หลังการเข้ารับการรักษาที่แผนกฉุกเฉิน โรงพยาบาลพระนครศรีอยุธยา. วารสารสมาคมเวชศาสตร์ป้องกันแห่งประเทศไทย 2568;15(1):118–41.

กลุ่มงานสารสนเทศและคอมพิวเตอร์ โรงพยาบาลพระนครศรีอยุธยา. ข้อมูลผู้ป่วย admission 2566-2567. พระนครศรีอยุธยา: โรงพยาบาลพระนครศรีอยุธยา; 2568.

Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ 2015;350:g7594.

Suetrong B, Walley KR. Lactic acidosis in sepsis: it’s not all anaerobic: implications for diagnosis and management. Chest 2016;149(1):252–61.

Wang J, Dong X, Zhan M, Qin B. Research advance on the role of interleukin-18, interleukin-37b and basophils in sepsis. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 2025;37(1):77–80.

Ruan X, Gao Y, Lai X, Wang B, Wu J, Yu X. Trimatch comparison of the prognosis of hypochloremia, normochloremia and hyperchloremia in patients with septic shock. J Formos Med Assoc 2025;124(5):426–31.

Chapalain X, Huet O, Balzer T, Delbove A, Martino F, Jacquier S, et al. Does Chloride Intake at the Early Phase of Septic Shock Resuscitation Impact on Renal Outcome?. Shock 2021;56(3):425–32.

Brown RM, Semler MW. Fluid Management in Sepsis. J Intensive Care Med 2019;34(5):364–73.

Vijendra B, Bertol AB, de Almeida MMG, de Freitas PHAG, Simão ÁMS, de Faria BL. Balanced crystalloid versus saline for resuscitation in pediatric septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 2025;25(1):81.

Long B, Gottlieb M. Emergency medicine updates: Management of sepsis and septic shock. Am J Emerg Med 2025;90:179–91.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Punyavirocha S. External Validation of a Prognostic Model for Predicting 24-Hour Mortality in Patients with Severe Septic Shock Presenting to the Emergency Department of Phra Nakhon Si Ayutthaya Hospital. JPMAT [internet]. 2026 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 May 4];16(1):64-83. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JPMAT/article/view/280731

Issue

Section

Original Article