Incidence Rate and Related Factors of Occupational Injuries Among Veterinarians of Veterinary Clinics and Hospitals in Bangkok


  • นภัฐมณ มโนรัตน์ Department of Prevention and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University
  • สุนทร ศุภพงษ์ Department of Prevention and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University


Veterinarians, Veterinarian injury, Occupational injury


     This descriptive study was conducted to determine the incidence rate and the factors which related to occupational injuries among veterinarians in veterinary clinics and hospitals in Bangkok from November 2015 to October 2016. The self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 527 veterinarians in each veterinary clinic/hospital and response rate was 74.9 percent. The results found that incidence rate of occupational injuries among these veterinarians were 280 times per million man-hours and 56.22 events per 100 full-time veterinarians. The most site of injury was hand. Abrasion and laceration were the most common injuries. Dog and cat bites were the most cause of injuries. Diagnostic process was the major activity associated with injury. Sixty-nine percent of this sample required physician treatment and 56.03 percent of this sample had work restriction. Factors related with occupational injuries were age, BMI, hour of sleep less than 7 hours, allergic rhinitis, taking drowsy pills, irregular exercise pattern, type of practice, year in practice, working time more than 40 hours per week, safety training required, insufficient assistants, uncaring animal restraint, not using safety bin, inadequate animal restrained equipment and
inadequate ambient light. According to the results from this research, the incidence rate of occupational injury among veterinarians could be reduced by appropriated adjustment of working and resting period, increasing awareness and knowledge transfer experienced. Moreover, working area should be properly prepared.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Constable PJ, Harrington JM. Harrington J. Risk of zoonoses in a veterinary service. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284:246-8.
2. Schnurrenberger P, Hansen L, Martin R. Infections with erysipelothrix, leptospira and chlamydia in Illinois veterinarians. Int J Zoonoses 1978;5:55-61.
3. Hjorth N, Weismann KS. Occupational dermatitis among veterinary surgeons caused by spiramycin, tylosin and penethamate. Acta Dermatovenereol Jugosl 1973;53:229-32.
4. Falk ES, Hektoen H, Thune PO. Skin and respiratory tract symptoms in veterinary surgeons. Contact Dermatitis 1985;12:274-8.
5. Elbers A, Blaauw P, de Vries M, van Gulick P, Smithuis O. An epidemiological study of several professional groups of Dutch veterinarians Part 1. Vet Q 1996;18:127-31.
6. Jeyaretnam J, Jones H. Physical, chemical and biological hazards in veterinary practice. Aust Vet J 2000;78:751-8.
7. Heinrich HW. Industrial Accident Prevention. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1959.
8. Landercasper J, Cogbill TH, Strutt PJ, Landercasper BO. Trauma and the veterinarian. J Trauma 1988;28:1255-9.
9. Nienhaus A, Skudlik C, Seidler A. Work-related accidents and occupational disease in veterinarians and their staff. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2005;78:230-8.
10. Gabel C, Gerberich SG. Risk factors for injury among veterinarians. Epidemiology 2002;13:80-6
11. สำนักควบคุมป้องกันและบำบัดโรคสัตว์. รายงานจำนวนสถานพยาบาลสัตว์ กรุงเทพฯ. (อินเตอร์เน็ต). (เข้าถึงเมื่อ 15 พฤศจิกายน 2558) เข้าถึงได้จาก:
12. OSHA Forms for recording Work-related Injuries and Illness [Internet]. [cited 2017 January 14]. Available from:
13. Langley R, Pryor W, O’Brian K. Health hazards among veterinarians: A survey and review of the literature. J Agro med 1995;2:23-52.
14. จันทิมา น้อยเนียม. วิเคราะห์ร่างพระราชบัญญัติความปลอดภัย อาชีวอนามัยและสภาพแวดล้อมในการทำงาน. [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญานิติศาสตร์มหาบัณฑิต]. กรุงเทพฯ: มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์; 2550.
15. Hill DJ, Langley RL, Morrow WM. Occupational injuries and illnesses reported by zoo veterinarians in the United States. J Zoo Wildl Med 1998;29:371-85.
16. Jeyaretnam J, Johnes H, Phillips M. Disease and injury among veterinarians. Aust Vet J 2000;78:625-9.
17. Lucas M, Day L, Shirangi A, Fritschi L. Significant injuries in Australian veterinarians and use of safety precautions. Occup Med 2009;59:327-33.
18. Wiggins P, Schenker MB, Green R, Samuels S. Prevalence of Hazardous Exposures in Veterinary Practice. Amer J Ind Med 1989;16(1):55-66.
19. Kabuusu R M, Keku EO, Kiyini R, McCann TJ. Prevalence and patterns of self-reported animal related injury among veterinarians in metropolitan Kampala, J Vet Sci 2011;4:363-5.
20. Fritschi L, Day L, Shirangi A, Robertson I, Lucas M, Vizard A. Injury in Australian veterinarians. Occup Med (Lond). 2006;56:199-203.
21. Suzuki H, Kitamura T, Shiomori T, Hiraki N, Fujimura T, Ueda N. Relationships among nasal obstruction, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life. Laryngoscope 2006; 116:2129-32.
22. Hanrahan L and Paramore L. Aeroallergens, allergic rhinitis, and sedating antihistamines: Risk factor for traumatic occupational injury and economic impact. Am J Ind Med 2003;44:438-46.
23. Demoly P, Maigret P, Elias Billon I, Alleaert FA. Allergic rhinitis increases the risk of driving accidents. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(2):614-16.
24. พระราชบัญญัติคุ้มครองแรงงาน พ.ศ. 2541. ภูมิพลอดุลยเดช ป.ร. (2541 กุมภาพันธ์ 12). หมวด 2 การใช้แรงงานทั่วไป มาตรา 23. หน้า 7.
25. Abraham Leo Gitlow, Labor and Industrial Society, revised edition Illinoise: Richard D. Irwin, 1963; p.132.
26. American Veterinary Medical Association. Guidelines for Veterinary Practice Facilities [Internet]. [cited 2017 January 14]. Available from:



How to Cite

มโนรัตน์ น, ศุภพงษ์ ส. Incidence Rate and Related Factors of Occupational Injuries Among Veterinarians of Veterinary Clinics and Hospitals in Bangkok. JPMAT [Internet]. 2018 Sep. 24 [cited 2022 Jan. 21];8(2):281-96. Available from:



Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)