From Black Box to Strategic Trust: The Theoretical Synthesis in Strategic Accounting
Keywords:
Accounting innovations, Strategic management accounting, Artificial intelligence, The theoretical synthesis, Strategic credibilityAbstract
The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in strategic accounting has transformed the role of accounting systems from financial reporting to supporting strategic decision-making within organizations. However, the use of AI raises challenges regarding transparency, outcome explanatory capability accountability, and data reliability, which traditional strategic accounting theories cannot fully address. Therefore, there is a need to synthesize knowledge and conceptual frameworks appropriate to the context of accounting in the AI era.
This academic article aims to (1) describe the developmental sequence of concepts and theories related to strategic accounting in the AI era, (2) analyze the strengths, limitations, and connections of related theories, and (3) synthesize theoretical lessons to develop practical application guidelines, using an integrated theoretical synthesis from agency theory, stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, institutional theory, resource and capability perspective, socio-technological system perspective, and concepts of accountability and auditing. The synthesis reveals that explaining the role of strategic accounting in the AI era requires the integration of multiple theories, as traditional theories have limitations in addressing issues of transparency, the explanatory capability of algorithms, and stakeholder trust. Furthermore, it leads to the proposal of an integrated conceptual framework that links data capability, AI explanatory capability, governance mechanisms, and stakeholder trust to organizational strategic outcomes. This article expands our understanding of strategic accounting in the digital age, provides a conceptual framework for future empirical research, and offers guidance for administrators and policymakers in designing accounting systems that are transparent, auditable, and build stakeholder confidence.
References
Akio, T. (2005). The critical assessment of the resource-based view of strategic management. Ritsumeikan International Affairs, 3, 125–150.
Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M., & Yan, Z. (2017). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25, 29–44.
Bar-Hava, K. (2025). The Ai-Induced Disclosure Pressure Model and Empirical Evidence from Md&A Reporting. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5353022
Chaisorn W. & Kesapradist B. (2017), Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development: Case study of 6 companies. Panyapiwat Journal, 9(3), 140-152. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pimjournal/article/view/107107 [in Thai]
Davis, F. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Jensen, M. C. (2000). A theory of the firm: Governance, residual claims, and organizational forms. Harvard University Press.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard. Harvard Business School Press.
Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. H. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1), 115–122.
Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100833.
Nguyen, T. L. (2024). Agency theory in management accounting: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(1), 1124–1127.
Pornlaputrachakorn K. (2022). Strategic management accounting innovation. Takasilakarnpim. [in Thai]
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
Rai, A. (2020). Explainable AI: From black box to glass box. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 137–141.
Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018). Business intelligence and analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 29, 37–58.
Rungfamai, K. (2017). Analysis approach of higher education governance from the perspective of socio-cultural agency theory. Dusit Thani College Journal, 11(2), 409-420. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journaldtc/article/view/120540 [in Thai]
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Sutton, S. G., Holt, M., & Arnold, V. (2023). The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated-Artificial intelligence research in accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 48, 100598.
Venkatesh, V., Morris M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D., (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general system theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165.
Weber, M. (1919). Economy and society. University of California Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christian University of Thailand

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.