ผลของโปรแกรมการสื่อสารในครอบครัวต่อการเสพสารเสพติดของวัยรุ่นผู้เสพติดสารกลุ่มโอปิออยด์ด้วยวิธีฉีด

Thantip Supatit; Sunisa Suktrakul

doi:10.58837/CHULA.JNRIH.37.2.9

Authors

Thantip Supatit Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkron University
Sunisa Suktrakul Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.JNRIH.37.2.9

Keywords:

family communication, adolescent opioid injectors, Substance abuse

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose: To study the impact of a family communication program on substance abuse among adolescent opioid injectors

Research Design: Quasi-experimental design for pre-test and post-test research

Method: example Adolescent males aged 18-24 years who are actively injecting opioids and father or mother treat at Princess Mother National Institute for Drug Abuse Treatment (PMNIDAT) 50 family The experimental group received a family communication program for a total of 6 weeks, while the control group received standard nursing care as usual The research tools used in the study include: 1) Family communication program, 2) Assessment questionnaire for opioid substance use, and 3) Assessment questionnaire for family communication. Data analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, และ Mann-Whitney U Test with statistical significance set at the .05 level

Results: Adolescent opioid injectors who received the family communication program showed a statistically significant reduction in opioid substance use compared to baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at one-month follow-up. Additionally, adolescent opioid injectors who received the family communication program demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in opioid substance use compared to the control group receiving standard care, both immediately post-intervention and at one-month follow-up.

Conclusion: The use of family communication programs impacts substance abuse differently, aligning with hypotheses.

References

Azadfard M, Huecker MR, Leaming JM. Opioid addiction. National Library of Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448203

Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Bucello C, Lemon J, Wiessing L, Hickman M. Mortality among people who inject drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013; 91(2): 102-23. https://doi.org/ 10.2471/BLT.12.108282

Office of the Secretary, Committee for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Drug Addicts, Ministry of Public Health. Performance report on treatment implementation: Thanyarak Institute units [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://antidrugnew.moph.go.th/

Princess Mother National Institute for Drug Abuse Treatment. Number of clients receiving services at Harm Reduction Centers, fiscal years 2020-2022 [unpublished manuscript]. 2023. (In Thai).

Hassanbeigi A, Askari J, Hassanbeigi D, Pourmovahed Z. The relationship between stress and addiction. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013; 84: 1333-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.752

Addolorato G, Leggio L, Abenavoli L, Gasbarrini G. Neurobiochemical and clinical aspects of craving in alcohol addiction: a review. Addict Behav. 2005; 30(6): 1209-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.12.011

Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(1): 217-38. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/npp.2009.110

Koob GF, Le Moal M. Plasticity of reward neurocircuitry and the ‘dark side’ of drug addiction. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11): 1442-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1105-1442

Chaiudomsom K, Paholpak P, Wattanawitkit P, Apisitpinyoyo S. Psychiatry. 2nd ed. Bangkok: Khlang Nanawitthaya Press; 2017. (In Thai).

Chumueang P, Photipirun W. A study of factors influencing drug use among drug-related offenders: a case study in Songkhla Province [master’s thesis]. Songkhla: Prince of Songkla University; 2020. (In Thai).

Mičková Z. Adolescence and manifestation emotions in the family. AD ALTA J Interdiscip Res. 2015; 5(1): 55-8. https://doi.org/10.33543/05015558

Peterson R, Green S. Families first-keys to successful family functioning: communication. Virginia Cooperative Extension; 2009. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/48300

Fernandez E, Woldgabreal Y, Day A, Pham T, Gleich B, Aboujaoude E. Live psychotherapy by video versusin-person: a meta-analysis of efficacy and its relationship to types and targets of treatment. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021; 28(6): 1535-49. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/cpp.2594

Koerner AF, Fitzpatrick MA. Toward a theory of family communication. Commun Theory. 2002; 12(1): 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x

Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline Follow-Back: a technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In: Litten RZ, Allen JP, editors. Measuring alcohol consumption: psychosocial and biochemical methods. Totowa (NJ): Humana Press; 1992. p.41-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0357-5_3

Liddle HA, Dakof GA, Rowe CL, Henderson C, Greenbaum P, Wang W, Alberga L. Multidimensional family therapy as a community-based alternative to residential treatment for adolescents with substance use and co-occurring mental health disorders. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018; 90: 47-56. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.04.011

Suwannachot KS. Effectiveness of a motivational enhancement and brief cognitive therapy group on relapse among methamphetamine users with psychiatric comorbidity at a psychiatric hospital in Southern Thailand [doctoral dissertation]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2010. (In Thai).

Pyecha AJ. Family communication patterns during recovery maintenance: relapse prevention for alcoholics & addicts [master’s thesis]. Norfolk (VA): Old Dominion University; 2020.