Effect of development of trauma system on outcome of major trauma patient in Prachinburi Province

Authors

  • ชาติชาย คล้ายสุบรรณ กลุ่มงานเวชศาสตร์ฉุกเฉิน โรงพยาบาลเจ้าพระยาอภัยภูเบศร จังหวัดปราจีนบุรี ประเทศไทย

Keywords:

Development of Trauma care, Mortality, Excess mortality, Door to Operating Room time, TRISS methodology

Abstract

Objective To determine the effect of development of trauma system on outcome of major trauma patient in Prachinburi Province

Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted before development, from October 2015 to September 2016, and then after development of trauma system, from October 2016 to September 2017. The outcome measurements were mortality rate, excess mortality (the difference between observed and expected death as measured by the TRISS methodology), and Door to Operating Room (OR) time.

Results A total of 547 patients from the before-development group (BDG), and 668 patients from the after-development group (ADG) were identified.The mortality rate was significantlydecreased from 15.17% to 10.03%, and the average Door to OR time was significantlydeclined from 89.85±20.1 to 72.48±18.2 (p=0.001) in ADG. Z statistic based on TRISS methodology was 3.48 (p<0.001) in BDG and 1.98 (p=0.04) in ADG indicated that both group had excess mortality.

Conclusions Development of trauma system in Prachinburi Province significantlydecreased the mortality rate, and Door to OR time. However, the result of higher observed mortality than expected based on the TRISS methodology suggests that continuous quality improvement is necessary for improving our trauma care.

References

1. Ernest E. Moore, David V. Feliciano, and Kenneth L. Mattox. Trauma.5th ed. McGraw Hill; 2004: p.57-84.

2. สำนักนโยบายและยุทธศาสตร์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. สถิติ 10 อันดับการตาย: 2544-2546, กระทรวงสาธารณสุข, 2547.

3. Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, Pracht E, Papa L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma. 2006; 60: 371-8.

4. Sampalis JS, Denis R, Lavoie A, Fréchette P, Boukas S, Nikolis A, et al. Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation. J Trauma. 1999; 46: 565-79; discussion 579-81.

5. Sampalis JS, Lavoie A, Boukas S, Tamim H, Nikolis A, Fréchette P, et al. Trauma center designation: initial impact on trauma-related mortality. J Trauma. 1995; 39: 232-7; discussion 237-9.

6. Kane G, Wheeler NC, Cook S, Englehardt R, Pavey B, Green K, et al. Impact of the Los Angeles County Trauma System on the survival of seriously injured patients. J Trauma. 1992; 32: 576-83.

7. Hedges JR, Mullins RJ, Zimmer-Gembeck M, Helfand M, Southard P. Oregon trauma system: change in initial admission site and post- admission transfer of injured patients. Acad Emerg Med. 1994; 1: 218-26.

8. Albernathy JH, McGwin G Jr, Acker JE, Rue LW. Impact of a voluntary trauma system on mortality, length of stay, and cost at level I trauma center. Am Surg. 2002; 68: 182-92.

9. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. J Trauma. 1987; 27: 370-8.10. Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Keast SL Bain LW, et al. The major trauma outcome study: establishing national norms for trauma care. J Trauma. 1990; 30: 1356-65.

Downloads

Published

07-08-2018

How to Cite

1.
คล้ายสุบรรณ ช. Effect of development of trauma system on outcome of major trauma patient in Prachinburi Province. ฺBu J Med [internet]. 2018 Aug. 7 [cited 2026 Jan. 25];5(1):25-3. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/BJmed/article/view/138803

Issue

Section

Original article