Cognitive Strategies for Children with Special Needs in Educational Settings Occupational therapy cognitive strategies
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the cognitive strategies used by Thai occupational therapists for children with special needs in various educational settings. The participants consisted of 55 occupational therapists, using purposive sampling. This study utilized a survey questionnaire, which was examined for content validity by five experts. Data collection was from 55 participants, of which 34 replied. Descriptive statistical analysis was used. The results showed that a sensory cue was used mostly in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Children with intellectual disabilities and ASD had the highest use of cognitive strategies among all disabilities. The therapists used the sensory cue in similar percentages for children with visual and hearing impairment. Various cognitive strategies for those with intellectual disabilities were similarity, including rehearsal technique, rote scripts, association, task simplification, attention to doing, and finger pointing. In addition, attention to doing, was the strategy most preferred among the therapists. On the other hand, task simplification was mostly chosen for children with learning disabilities. Stimuli reduction, organization, and finger pointing were the three strategies most selected for children with speech and language disabilities. The therapists employed self–coaching, task simplification, and finger pointing as the highest strategies for children with behavioral and emotional problems. Moreover, task simplification and the sensory cue were mostly selected for children with multiple disabilities. In conclusion, the occupational therapists used different cognitive strategies for children with special needs in relation to their cognitive problems, to encourage participation in daily routines and schooling tasks.
Article Details
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
The authors retain copyright and permit the journal the copyright of first publication
Articles, once having passed the review process and accepted for publication in the CDMH Journal, are copyrighted under the CDMH Journal, Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health. Please be aware distribution of CDMH Journal content for commercial purposes without permission is expressly prohibited. However, distribution with intent to educate, advocate, or spread awareness within the general public and research communities is permitted and encouraged with the understanding that the CDMH Journal Editorial Board do not hold jurisdiction or liability for any accompanying comments, text, or information from third parties, either in favor for or against the original article’s assertions, conclusions, methodology, or content.
References
Algahtani, F. (2017). Teaching students with intellectual disabilities: Constructivism or behaviorism?
Educational Research and Reviews, 12(21), 1031-1035.
American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA). (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework:
Domain and process. 3nd ed. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Supplement_1), S1-S48.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.
Benedict, K. M., Rivera, M. C., & Antia, S. D. (2015). Instruction in metacognitive strategies to increase deaf and
hard-of-hearing students' reading comprehension. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(1), 1-
Banwell, B. L., & Anderson, P. E. (2005). The cognitive burden of multiple sclerosis in children. Neurology, 64(5),
–894.
Besio, S., Carnesecchi, M., & Converti, R. M. (2013). Prompt-fading strategies in robot
mediated play sessions. Proceedings of Assistive Technology: From Research to
Practice, AAATE, 143-p8.
Clark, G. J. F., & Schlabach, T. L. (2013). Systematic review of occupational therapy
interventions to improve cognitive development in children ages birth–5
years. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(4), 425-430.
Cook, R. E., Richardson-Gibbs, A. M., & Dotson, L. N. (2016). Strategies for Including Children with Special
Needs in Early Childhood Settings. United States: Cengage Learning.
Danielsson, H., Henry, L., Rönnberg, J., & Nilsson, L. G. (2010). Executive functions in
individuals with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6),
-1304.
Demetriou, E.A., Lampit, A., Quintana, D.S., Naismith, S.L., Song, Y.J.C., Pye, J.E.,
Hickie, I., & Guastella, A.J. (2018). Autism spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis of executive function.
Molecular Psychiatry, 23(5), 1198–1204.
Dido, G., Susie, C., Tony, C., Emily, S., & Gillian, B. (2016). Brief report: DSM-5 sensory behaviours in children
with and without an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 46 (11),
-3606.
Lal, R., & Bali, M. (2007). Effect of visual strategies on development of communication skills in children with
autism. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 8(2), 120-130.
Luyster, R., & Lord, C. (2009). Word learning in children with autism spectrum
disorders. Developmental psychology, 45(6), 1774.
Lowe, S. (2010). Cognitive strategies and school participation for students with learning
difficulties. Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/41235224.pdf.
Montague, M., Enders, C., & Dietz, S. (2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of
middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 262-272.
Nott, M. T., & Chapparo, C. (2008). Measuring information processing in a client with extreme agitate
following traumatic brain injury using the Perceive, Recall Plan and Perform System of Task Analysis.
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55(3), 188-198.
Polatajko, H. J., & Mandich, A. (2004). Enabling occupation in children: The cognitive orientation to daily
occupational performance. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
Shiran, A., & Breznitz, Z. (2011). The effect of cognitive training on recall range and speed
of information processing in the working memory of dyslexic and skilled
readers. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(5), 524-537.
Shree, A., & Shukla, P.C. (2016). Intellectual Disability: definition, classification, causes and characteristics.
Learning Community, 7(1), 9-20.
Singer, R. N., & Chen, D. (1994). A classification scheme for cognitive strategies:
Implications for learning and teaching psychomotor skills. Research Quarterly for
Exercise and Sport, 65(2), 143-151.
Solomon, M., Ozonoff, S. J., Ursu, S., Ravizza, S., Cummings, N., Ly, S., & Carter, C. S.
(2009). The neural substrates of cognitive control deficits in autism spectrum
disorders. Neuropsychologia, 47(12), 2515-2526.
Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C. M., & Orosco M. J. (2015). Cognitive strategies, working memory, and growth in
word problem solving in children with math difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 339-358.
Till, C., Ghassemi, R., Aubert-Broche, B., Kerbrat, A., Collins, D. L., Narayanan, S., ... &
Banwell, B. L. (2011). MRI correlates of cognitive impairment in childhood-onset
multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 25(3), 319.
Toglia, J. P. (2011). The dynamic interactional model of cognition in cognitive rehabilitation.
Cognition, occupation and participation across the life span: Neuroscience, neurorehabilitation and
models of interventionin occupational therapy, 3rd ed. (pp. 161–201).Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press.
Toglia, J. P., Rodger, S. A., & Polatajko, H. j. (2012). Anatomy of cognitive strategies: A therapist’s primer for
enabling occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(4), 225-236.
Walsh, M. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2009). The strategic nature of changing your
mind. Cognitive psychology, 58(3), 416-440.
Westwood, P. S. (2006). Teaching and learning difficulties: Cross-curricular perspectives.
Australia: ACER Press.
Wolf, T., & Baum, C. (2011). Impact of mild cognitive impairments on participation: Importance of early
identification of cognitive loss. In N. Katz (Ed.), Cognition, occupation, and participation across the life
span (pp. 41–50). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press.
Zhang, N., & Kong, Y. (2018). A cognitive therapy intervention programme increases working memory in
students with learning disabilities. NeuroQuantology, 16(2), 45-49.