Assessing the acceptability of an Automated Health Records Information System in the universities: a technology acceptance model approach
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research assessed the acceptability of the Automated Health Records Information System in a state university clinic located in Cebu, Philippines, and aimed to enhance healthcare management in the digital era. Employing the Technology Acceptance Model, the study examined user perceptions and satisfaction with the software, providing insights into its effectiveness in improving workflow efficiency and patient care. The study employed a weighted mean utilizing a five-point Likert scale to evaluate the acceptability of the software and a four-point scale for expert validation. A descriptive correlational method was utilized, applying Pearson r to analyze the degree of correlation. The study revealed that the software was highly acceptable based on perceived usefulness, ease of use, intention to use, and actual use, as rated by the respondents. Moreover, the technical requirements of the software, including design, features, and program content, were also positively rated. The null hypotheses were not rejected as there were no significant interrelationships among the four acceptability variables, indicating that other factors, such as the type of institutional support, user’s characteristics, experiences, and skills, may influence the inter-correlation acceptability of variables. Respondents highlighted challenges in software navigation and expressed the need for comprehensive training. Despite these challenges, the study strongly recommended the acceptability and adoption of the Automated Health Records Information System to enhance healthcare delivery within university clinics, emphasizing its role in seamlessly managing health records for all university personnel and students, in alignment with broader institutional objectives aimed at improving overall well-being and organizational efficiency.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Borzuchowska M, Kilańska D, Kozłowski R, Iltchev P, Czapla T, Marczewska S, Marczak M. The effectiveness of healthcare system resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59(5): 946.
Ikwu A, Igwe D, Nwawudu S, Adebayo A. The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on Africa’s healthcare system and psychosocial life. Eur J Nat Sci Med 2021; 4(1): 39-50.
Swathi K, Latha SB, Vadlamudi MN, Alkhafaji MA, Mohsen KS, Saikumar K. Automation of health monitoring system for elderly and COVID-19 patients using IoT. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 8th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT); 2023 Apr 14-16; Lonavla, India. IEEE: 2023.
Al-Atawi AA, Khan F, Kim CG. Application and challenges of IoT healthcare system in COVID-19. Sensors 2022; 22(19): 7304.
Epizitone A, Moyane SP, Agbehadji IE. A systematic literature review of health information systems for healthcare. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 2023; 11(7): 959.
Brailer DJ. The decade of health information technology: delivering consumer-centric and information-rich health care. Framework for strategic action [online] 2004 Jul 21 [cited 2024 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-HE-PURLgpo800/ pdf/GOVPUB-HE-PURL-gpo800.pdf.
National Association of School Nurses. Electronic health records: an essential school nursing tool for supporting student health [online] 2024 Jan [cited 2024 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.nasn.org/nasn-resources/professional- practice-documents/position-statements/ ps-electronic-health-records.
National Association of School Nurses. Framework for 21st century school nursing practice™: clarifications and updated definitions. NASN Sch Nurse 2020; 35(4): 225-33.
Nicholson C, Johnson K. Unlocking the power of school nursing documentation. NASN Sch Nurse 2020; 35(4): 203-7.
Bergren M, Maughan E. The school nurse’s role in evidence-based practice, quality improvement, and research. In: Selekeman J, Shannon R, Yonkaitis C, editors. School Nursing: A Comprehensive Text. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2019. p. 96-115.
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989; 13(3): 319-40. 12. Stoumpos AI, Kitsios F, Talias MA. Digital transformation in healthcare: technology acceptance and its applications. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(4): 3407.
Foley Curley K. Are there any real benefits from office automation? Bus Horiz 1984; 27(4): 37-42.
Sharda R, Barr SH, McDonnell JC. Decision support system effectiveness: A review and an empirical test. Manage Sci 1988; 34(2): 139-59.
Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int J Man-Mach Stud 1993; 38(3): 475-87.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychol Health 2011; 26(9): 1113-27.
Doremus W, Niskanen W, Berry K, Cogan R, Jordan A. Electronic health records: an essential school nursing tool for supporting student health [online] 2024 Jan [cited 2024 Jul 1]. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov /?q=EHR+in+school+nursing&id=ED652737.
Davis D, Maughan E, White K, Slota M. School nursing for the 21st century: Assessing scope of practice in the current workforce. J Sch Nurs 2021; 37(5): 374-86.
National Association of School Nurses. Translating strategies into actions to improve care coordination for students with chronic health conditions [online] 2019 [cited 2024 Jul 2]. Available from: https://learn.nasn. org/courses/11191/documents/15673.
Press A, DeStio C, McCullagh L, Kapoor S, Morley J, SBIRT NY-II Team, et al. Usability testing of a national substance use screening tool embedded in electronic health records. JMIR Hum Factors 2016; 3(2): e18.