Comparison of the effects of constant force and gradual increased force of intermittent cervical traction in cervical radiculopathy

Main Article Content

Krittika Thepsoda

Abstract

Cervical radiculopathy is a common disorder of the nerve root and is a pathologic process, which has been defined as pain in the distribution of a specific cervical nerve root. Mechanical cervical traction is one of the physical therapy interventions that has been proposed in the management of cervical radiculopathy. An important element that affects the efficiency of the cervical traction is using force or weight, which can be set as appropriate. Many studies have presented the effectiveness of intermittent cervical traction, but rarely mentioned about the efficiency or the reasonable force being used. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the therapeutic effect between constant force and gradual increased force of intermittent cervical traction on pain and the self-evaluated disability of cervical radiculopathy patients. Sixty-four cervical radiculopathy patients were randomly screened; eleven did not comply with the inclusion criteria and withdrew. The remaining 53 patients were divided into two groups. Group I (n=24) received constant force, and Group II (n=29) received gradual increased force of intermittent cervical traction. All patients were treated with superficial heat, a neck retraction exercise program to consistently practice at home every day, together with instructions on the correct neck posture and principles of ergonomics in activities of daily living. For Group II, the gradual increased force was required to be recorded and the increase of the force was discontinued in the event of pain or other forms of discomfort. Each patient reported responsiveness within a period of seven visits. The results of the first and last visits were collected with a visual analog scale (VAS) and the neck disability index (NDI). The findings showed that both groups experienced a significant (p-value < 0.01) improvement of pain (VAS) and disability (NDI). A comparison of the improvement, or the reduction of pre and post-treatment between both groups, found that Group II experienced a greater reduction than Group I for both evaluations with a significant difference (p-value < 0.01). This included the results of the gradual increased force (Group II) that found 48.27% of the patients had to discontinue at the fourth visit with the force 15.18 ± 0.98% of the total body weight (TBW). The mean duration of the physical therapy of Group I was 6.46 ± 1.06 visits and Group II was 5.66 ± 1.49 visits. It could be concluded that using gradual increased force of intermittent cervical traction displayed significant effective results for the treatment of pain and self-evaluated disability in a short period of time. This should be applied along with neck retraction exercises and postural education.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Thepsoda K. Comparison of the effects of constant force and gradual increased force of intermittent cervical traction in cervical radiculopathy. Arch AHS [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 29 [cited 2024 May 21];32(3):58-67. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ams/article/view/241727
Section
Original article

References

Donatelli R, Wooden M. Orthopaedic physical therapy, 4th ed. In: Stratton SA, Bryan JM. Dysfunction, evaluation, and treatment of the cervical spine and thoracic inlet. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010: 127-60.

Cameron M. Physical agents in rehabilitation, from research to practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2013.

Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, Teyhen DS, Wainner RS, Whitman JM, et al. Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines link to the international classification of functioning, disability, health from the orthopedics section

of the American physical therapy association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008; 38(9): A1-34.

Magee D. Orthopeadic physical assessment. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006.

Thepsoda K. Posteroanterior central vertebral pressure test for detection of nerve root compression within spine in radicular pain patients. Thai J Phys Ther 2011; 33(2): 89-98.

Graham N, Gross AR, Goldsmith C. Mechanical traction for mechanical neck disorders: a systemic review. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 145-52.

Moffett JA, Hughes GI. An investigation of the effects of cervical traction. part I: clinical effectiveness. Clin Rehabil 1990; 4: 205-11.

Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Heath R. Predictors of short-term outcome in people with a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Phys Ther 2007; 87(12): 1619-32.

Angela Tao NG, Arora R, Arora L. Effective of cervical traction on pain and disability in cervical radiculopathy. IJRSR 2015; 6: 3609-11.

Fritz JM, Thackeray A, Brennan GP, Childs JD. Exercise only, exercise with mechanical traction, or exercise with over-door traction for patients with cervical radiculopathy, with or without consideration of status on a previously described subgrouping rule: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44(2): 45-57.

Lui J, Ebraheim NA, Sanford CG, Patil V, Elsamalory H, Treuhafi K, et al. Quantitative changes in the cervical neural foramen resulting from axial traction: in vivo imaging study. Spine J 2008; 8: 619-23.

Ojoawo AO, Olabode A, Esan O, Badru A, Odejide S, Arilewola B. Therapeutic efficacy of cervical traction in the management of cervical radiculopathy. Rwanda J Health Sci 2013; 2(2): 25-9.

Hoseinpour S, Amanollahi A, Sobhani V, Mohseni A, Arazi E. Comparison of neck and shoulder strengthening exercises with weight, traction plus physiotherapy, and acupuncture in the treatment of patients with chronic

cervical disk herniation. IJSRK 2015; 3(4): 114-20.

Jellad A, Salah ZB, Boudokhane S, Migaou H, Bahri I, Rejeb N. The value of intermittent cervical traction in resent cervical radiculopathy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 53: 638-52.

Bukhari SRI, Shakil-ur-Rehamn S, Ahmad S, Naeem A. Comparison between effectiveness of mechanical and manual traction combined with mobilization and exercise therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Pak J Mef Sci 2016; 32(1): 31-4.

Akinbo SR, Noronha CC, Okanlawon AO, Danesi MA. Effects of different cervical traction weight on neck pain and mobility. Niger Postgrad Med J 2006; 13(3): 230-35.

Donatelli R, Wooden M. Orthopaedic physical therapy, 4th ed. In: Moore H, Nichols C, Engles ML. Tissue response. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2010: 1-26.

Korhonen RK, Saarakkala S. Biomechanics and modeling of skeletal soft tissues, Theoretical Biomechanics. [Internet]. 2011: 113-31.Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/theoreticalbiomechanics/biomechani c s - andmodeling-of-skeletal-soft-tissues.

Akinbo SR, Danesi MA, Oke DA, Aiyejusunle CB, Adeyomote AA. Comparison of supine and sitting positions cervical traction on cardiovascular parameter, pain and neck mobility in patients with cervical spondylosis. The internet J Rheumatology 2013; 8(1): 1-9.

Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13: 227-36.

Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of Adult Pain. AC&R 2011; 63: S240-52.

Luksanapruksa P, Wathana-api sit T, Wanasinthop S, Sanpakit S, Chavasiri C. Reliability and validity study of thai version of the neck disability index in patients with neck pain. J Med Assoc Thai 2012; 95(5): 681-88.

Sari H, Akarimak U, Karacan I, Akman H. Evalution of effects of cervical traction on spinal structures by computerized tomography. Adv Physiother 2003; 5: 114-21.

Chung TS, LeeYJ, Kang SW, Shim YW. Reducibility of cervical disk herniation: evaluation at MR imaging during cervical traction with a nonmagnetic traction device. Radiology 2002; 225: 895-900.

Hafez AR, Zakaria AR. Intermittent versus sustained cervical traction in treatment of cervical spondylosis. Bull Fac Ph Cairo Univ 2009: 14(2): 123-30.

Akbari M, Bayat M. Effects of intermittent traction in patients with cervical osteoarthritis. MJIRI 2010; 24(1): 23-8.

Pan PJ, Tsai PH, Tsai CC, Chou CL, Lo MT, Chiu JHC. Clinical response and automatics modulation as seen in heart rate variability in mechanical intermittent cervical traction. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 229-34.

Cleland JA, Whitman JM, Fritz JM, Palmer JA. Manual physical therapy, cervical traction, and strengthening exercises in patients with cervical radiculopathy: a case series. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35(12): 802-11.

Neeraj K, Shiv V. To compare the effect of strengthening neck exercise and Mckenzie neck exercise in neck pain subjects. Br J Med Health Res 2016; 3(10): 69-79.

Rathore S, Use of McKenzie cervical protocol in the treatment of radicular neck pain in a mechine operator. JCCA 2003; 47(4): 291-97.

Abdulwahab SS, Sabbahi M. Neck retractions, cervical root decompression, and radicular pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2000; 30(1): 4-12.