The study on the identification of characters for Bungarus multicinctus and adulterants
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Through textual research, it was found that the application of Bungarus multicinctus dates back to the time point which is earlier than the Republican era (1936) and the Bungarus multicinctus is different from the origin of the Agkistrodon acutus recorded in ancient literature. Summarized the key points of experience identification of Bungarus multicinctus, organized the methods of counterfeiters way which is the most common and frequently used. Identify the differences in appearance characteristics by comparing the characteristics of genuine, mixed up, and counterfeit products. Summarized the rapid identification methods differences between Bungarus multicinctus and the common counterfeit Dinodon rufozonatum, that can be used to identify the authenticity of Bungarus multicinctus and mixed up, and counterfeit products.
Article Details
References
Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People's Republic of China (part 1). Beijing: China Medical Technology Press; 2020. (in Chinese)
Li JD, Chen SJ, Huang LQ. Research on animal medicinal materials in the Chinese pharmacopoeia. Fuzhou: Fujian Science and Technology Publishing House; 2021. (in Chinese)
National Forestry and Grassland Administration. Notice on list of terrestrial wildlife under state protection that is beneficial or has important economic and scientific research value (Vol. 7) [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2017 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-03/15/content_5718756.htm (in Chinese)
Wang YR. New reference of prepared medicines. Shanghai: Shanghai Qianqingtang Bookstore; 1936. (in Chinese)
Read BE. Chinese Materia Medica. Beijing: Peking Natural History Bulletin; 1934. (in Chinese)
Zhu JP, Wang YY, Liang JS. Research and standardization of traditional Chinese medicine names. Beijing: Traditional Chinese Medicine Classics Press; 2007. (in Chinese)
Dong YM, Huang MH. Zoology of Zhejiang province. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Press; 1990. (in Chinese)
Li SZ. Compendium of Materia Medica, volume 1. Beijing: People's Health Publishing House; 1981. (in Chinese)
Liu LB. Revised Taiwan prefectural annals (III). Taipei: Chengwen Publishing House; 1983. (in Chinese)
Tang SW. Revised political and historical evidence backup manuscript. Beijing: Photocopy by People's Health Publishing House; 1957. (in Chinese)
Kou ZS. Augmented materia medica. Beijing: The Commercial Press; 1957. (in Chinese)
China Medical Research Society. Picture of Chinese drug specimens. 4th ed. Shanghai: World Books; 1935. (in Chinese)
Guan CY. Identification of money white snake and its counterfeit and easy to mix products. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research. 2000;11(1):44. (in Chinese)
Dang YC, Liu ZH. Identification of money white snake and several counterfeits. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs. 1999;30(10):783-4. (in Chinese)
Zhai YJ, Kang TG, Feng XH, Liang SW, Sun LX, Gao HR, et al. Identification of Bungarus parvus and its conrused snakes. China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica. 1994;19(3):135-8. (in Chinese)
Wu SR, Kong ZK. Practical manual for identification of Chinese medicinal materials. Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Press; 1990. (in Chinese)
Mu ET, Liu YW, Yang QS, Sun YZ. Identification of Bungarus multicinctus by microscopic characteristics. Journal of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine. 2016;35(1):83-5. (in Chinese)
Jiang JX. Key points for identifying the Bungarus multicinctus. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs. 2004;1(9):110. (in Chinese)
