Development of a Self-Management Model for Elderly at Risk of Stroke in the Digital Era

Authors

  • Chakkrit Phukjit Faculty of Nursing Chiang Rai Rajabhat University
  • Nutchayaporn Tungdumrongsil Faculty of Nursing Chiang Rai Rajabhat University
  • Saranrat Siriwatthananan Faculty of Nursing Chiang Rai Rajabhat University
  • วรวรรณ สุภาตา Faculty of Nursing Chiang Rai Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Elderly, Self-Management, Stroke, Research and development, Digital Era

Abstract

 This study aimed to develop and evaluate a digital-era self management model for older adults at risk of stroke. A total of 50 older adults residing in Ban Du Subdistrict, Chiang Rai Province, were selected through simple random sampling and assigned to an experimental group (n=25) and a control group (n=25). The experimental group received the developed 12 week self management program, while the control group received routine care. Research instruments included assessments of knowledge, risk level, self management behaviors, blood pressure, and lipid profiles, all demonstrating acceptable reliability. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, and Independent t-test, whereas qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis.
Results indicated that older adults required user friendly digital media, risk alert functions, and proactive support from health personnel. Following the intervention, the experimental group showed significantly higher knowledge and self management behavior scores than the control group (p<.05). Ten year stroke risk decreased significantly (Z = -3.26; p = .001), along with reductions in blood pressure and lipid levels compared with the control group.
In conclusion, the developed self management model effectively improved health behaviors and clinical outcomes among older adults at risk of stroke. Integration into primary healthcare services and enhancement of digital literacy are recommended to support long term sustainability.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Digital health and aging: opportunities and challenges. Geneva: WHO Publications; 2021

Doungchan N, Sinprasert P, Throngthieng W, Wanchai A, Suttilak C & Banlengchit S. Stroke in older people and guidelines for strengthening caregivers. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2021;22(1):20-8. (in Thai)

Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabi M & Sachdev S. Stroke: a global response is needed. Bulletin World Health Organization. 2016;94(9): 634-634A.

Ministry of Public Health. Public health statistics 2022. Nonthaburi: Strategy and Planning Division; 2022. (in Thai)

Sriwanichakorn S. Morbidity and mortality situation of non-communicable diseases in Thailand during 2010-2014. Journal of Disease Control. 2017;43(4):379-90. (in Thai)

Kaewbangpood T, Suwanno J, & Thiamwong L. Predictive factors of 10-year risk for coronary artery disease among rural elderly. Journal of Nursing and Health Care. 2015;33(3):174-84. (in Thai)

Kingkaew P, Khupithakkhajon T, Srisuwan P, Yankong S, Tantivess S, & Teerawattananon Y. Risk assessment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Journal of Health Systems Research. 2013;7(3):346-60. (in Thai)

Kansri J, Malai C, Tiaonukul N, Srinuan P, & Yodthongdee N. Effectiveness of a mental health promotion program on mental health status among older adults. Journal of Health and Nursing Research. 2020;36(2): 95-107. (in Thai)

Watthana P, Chantakhamma N, & Pantawan P. Effects of a self-management program combined with the “Chan-Chana” mobile application to prevent stroke among at-risk groups in Sukhothai Province. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2022;14(2):92-108. (in Thai)

Department of Health. Guidelines for promoting elderly health in the digital era. Nonthaburi: Ministry of Public Health; 2021

Srisawat S. Development of a self-management model for elderly at risk of stroke using digital technology. Journal of Health Research. 2022;15(2):45–60. (in Thai)

Browder DM, & Shapiro ES. Self-management procedures for improving classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools. 1985;22(3):273-9.

Creer TL. Self-management of chronic illness. In: Boekarts M, Pintrich P, Seidner M, editors. Self-regulation: theory, research, and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000.

Thairuakam S. Research and development: Method for research developing. Journal of Research and Social Community Development, Rajabhat Mahasarakham University. 2014;1(1):2-11. (in Thai)

Burns N, & Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 8th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2017.

American Heart Association. Stroke risk score card [Internet]. Dallas (TX): American Heart Association; 2022 [cited 2025 Nov 28]. Available from: https://stroke.org/

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, & Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91.

Pragodpol P, & Intana J. Self-management behaviors among elderly patients with stroke risk factors. Journal of Nursing Science. 2019;37(2):45-52. (in Thai)

Wongwan P. Stroke risk and warning signs in patients with chronic disease, Maepong Sub-district, Doi Saket District, Chiang Mai Province. [Independent Study]. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2014. (in Thai)

Amornwit P, Worawong J, & Po-wong W. Effect of self-management program on selfmanagement behaviors in stroke patients: a systematic review. Thai Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Nursing. 2020; 31(2):162-75. (in Thai)

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3): 297-334.

Kuder GF, & Richardson MW. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika. 1937;2(3):151-60. doi:10.1007/BF02288391.

Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL, editors. Breakthroughs in statistics. Vol II: Methodology and distribution. New York: Springer; 1992: 196-202.

Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2016.

Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and theory: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

Becker MH. The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Education Monographs. 1974;2(4):324-508.

Rosenstock IM. The health belief model: explaining health behavior through expectancies. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1990:39-62.

Davis FD. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end user information systems: theory and results. [dissertation]. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1986.

Polit DF, Beck CT, & Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health. 2007;30(4):459-67.

Teo S, Krishnan A, Tan J, & Lee J. Relationship between knowledge, attitudes, and practice of stroke prevention among adults in Singapore. International Journal of Stroke. 2018;13(1):34-41.

Srisawasdi S, Chantakhamma N, & Pantawan P. Effects of a self management program Combined with the Chan Chana application on knowledge, health behaviors, and stroke risk among older adults in Sukhothai Province. Journal of Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2023; 24(1): 45-60. (in Thai).

Downloads

Published

08-04-2026

How to Cite

1.
Phukjit C, Tungdumrongsil N, Siriwatthananan S, สุภาตา ว. Development of a Self-Management Model for Elderly at Risk of Stroke in the Digital Era. J Royal Thai Army Nurses [internet]. 2026 Apr. 8 [cited 2026 Apr. 16];27(1):149-57. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/283147

Issue

Section

Research Articles