Using Neuro-Linguistic Programming for Enhancing Executive Functions of the Brain in Early Childhood

Authors

  • Naphatsachon Khammee Faculty of Education, Burapha University
  • Juthamas Haenjohn Faculty of Education, Burapha University
  • Sasinan Sirithadakunlaphat Faculty of Education, Burapha University

Keywords:

Neuro-Linguistic Programming, Executive functions of the brain, Early childhood

Abstract

The objective of this research was to test the effectiveness of using Neuro-Linguistic Programming to enhance executive functions of the brain for early childhood. The participants were Kindergarten 3 students. Forty-nine students (n = 49) were randomly selected by cluster sampling and divided into 2 groups: the experimental group (n = 27) was trained by using the program to enhance executive functions of the brain with Neuro-Linguistic Programming for early childhood, and the control group (n = 22) was studied according to the school curriculum. The research instruments were: 1) the program to enhance executive functions of the brain with Neuro-Linguistic Programming for early childhood consisting of 8 sessions (30-50 minutes each). It was developed by researchers based on Pillars of NLP such as rapport, acuity, outcomes, flexibility and anchoring techniques. 2) Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Second Edition (BRIEF2): Teacher Form with 63 items to assess the impairment of executive function tested for 3 periods: pre-test, post-test, and follow-up in 2 weeks. Statistical analyses were formed with one-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Bonferroni method was performed for multiple comparisons. The results showed that the experimental group had a significantly higher executive functions of the brain than control group in post-test and follow-up (p < .05). And, in the experimental group, the post-test had a significantly higher executive functions of the brain than follow-up period (p < .05).

References

Gilbert SJ, Burgess PW. Executive function. Current Biology. 2008;18(3):R110-R114.

Casey BJ, Tottenham N, Liston C, Durston S. Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development?. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2005;9(3):104-10.

Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology. 2000;41(1):49-100.

Diamond A, Ling DS. Conclusions about interventions, programs, and approaches for improving executive functions that appear justified and those that, despite much hype, do not. Developmental cognitive neuroscience. 2016;18(2016):34-48.

Diamond A. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;64(2013):135-68.

Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. BRIEF-2: Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2015.

Chano J. Executive Functions and Early Childhood Development. Journal of Education, Mahasarakham University. 2019; 13(1):7-17. (in Thai)

Nopakhun J. The Development of Executive Function for 21st Century Preschool Children through Montessori Approach. Journal of education silpakorn University. 2018;16(1): 75-90. (in Thai)

Haenjohn, J. Neuro-linguistic programming [NLP]: application for counseling, learning, and Business: Chonburi, Get Good Creation; 2014. (in Thai)

Ahmad KZ. Improving emotional intelligence (EI) using neuro linguistic programming (NLP) techniques. InInternational Conference on Advances in Business and Law (ICABL). 2017;1(1):172-83.

Hejase HJ. Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP): Awareness and practice in UAE. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences. 2015;3(10):135-7.

Fabiańska M, Bosiacki M, Simińska D. The role of mirror neurons in cognitive and social functioning. Pomeranian Journal of Life Sciences. 2020;66(4):30-40.

Elston T, Spohrer K. Using NLP to enhance behaviour and learning: A handbook for teachers. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2009.

Skinner H, Croft R. Neuro‐linguistic programming techniques to improve the self‐efficacy of undergraduate dissertation students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2009;1(1):30-8.

Javadi Y, Asl SA. Neuro-linguistic Programming, Teacher’s Identity, and Teachers’ Effectiveness. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2020;11(3):389-98.

Mukherjee S. Anchoring-An NLP Master Tool. Available at SSRN 2191435. 2012.

Patyencheun W, Haenjohn J, Sirithadakunlaphat S. Development of Program to Promote Attention Based on Neuro-Linguistic Programming in Primary School Students. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2019; 20(3):305-12. (in Thai)

Phetmrum C, Haenjohn J, Supwirapakorn W. The Development of Promote Inhibitory Control in School Age Children. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2022; 23(1):390-8. (in Thai)

Alghafri AS, Ismail HN. The effects of neuroscience-and non-neuroscience-based thinking strategies on primary school students’ thinking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;15(2011):3291-8.

Zhang X, Davarpanah N, Izadpanah S. The effect of neurolinguistic programming on academic achievement, emotional intelligence, and critical thinking of EFL learners. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;13(2022):1-11.

Lertladaluck K, Suppalarkbunlue W, Moriguchi Y, Chutabhakdikul N. School-based mindfulness intervention improves executive functions and self-regulation in preschoolers at risk. The Journal of Behavioral Science. 2021; 16(2):58-72.

Li Q, Song Y, Lian B, Feng T. Mindfulness training can improve 3-and 4-year-old children’s attention and executive function. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 2019;51(3):324-36.

Howard SJ, Powell T, Vasseleu E, Johnstone S, Melhuish E. Enhancing Preschoolers’ Executive Functions Through Embedding Cognitive Activities in Shared Book Reading. Educational Psychology Review. 2017;29(2017):153–74.

Pishghadam R, Shapoori M, Shayesteh S. NLP and its relationship with teacher success, gender, teaching experience, and degree: A comparative study. World journal of English language. 2011;1(2):2-8.

Lashkarian A, Sayadian S. The effect of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) techniques on young Iranian EFL Learners’ motivation, learning improvement, and on teacher’s success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;199(2015):510-6.

Bull L. Sunflower therapy for children with specific learning difficulties (dyslexia): a randomised, controlled trial. Complementary therapies in clinical practice. 2007;13(1):15-24.

Walk LM, Evers WF, Quante S, Hille K. Evaluation of a teacher training program to enhance executive functions in preschool children. PloS one. 2018;13(5):1-20. 28.Anderson PJ, Reidy N. Assessing executive function in preschoolers. Neuropsychology review. 2012;22(4):345-60.

Downloads

Published

10-04-2024

How to Cite

1.
Khammee N, Haenjohn J, Sirithadakunlaphat S. Using Neuro-Linguistic Programming for Enhancing Executive Functions of the Brain in Early Childhood. J Royal Thai Army Nurses [Internet]. 2024 Apr. 10 [cited 2024 Jul. 18];25(1):319-27. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/264888

Issue

Section

Research Articles