Conceptual Framework Quality Maternal and Newborn Care

Authors

  • Thitaporn Siriwan Obstetrics Nursing Department, The Royal Thai Army Nursing College
  • Supunnika Pansri Obstetrics Nursing Department, The Royal Thai Army Nursing College
  • Darin Srichum Obstetrics Nursing Department, The Royal Thai Army Nursing College

Keywords:

Quality care, Maternal and newborn care, Framework

Abstract

Maternal death and stillbirth occur worldwide and, although countries have made progress on maternal and newborn care leading to reduce maternal mortality and stillbirth rates, more effort is needed to reach Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The majority of causes of maternal death and stillbirth are prevented with quality care during childbirth; evidence shows that midwifery is pivotal for leveling up the quality of maternal and newborn care in all countries. The framework for Quality Maternal and Newborn Care (QMNC) was developed based on the definition of midwifery practice for being a standard care for childbearing women, newborn infants, and families across the continuum throughout pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. This framework consists of evidence-based practice; organizational care, that promotes accessibility and quality care and integrates midwives into the health system; values of care, where women and families receive respectful care; a philosophy which optimise physiological birth; and care providers who are knowledgeable, skilled, and competent to deliver the quality care. In conclusion, the QMNC Framework contributes to midwifery, including practices, organizations, values, philosophy, and care providers. This framework can apply to all women and newborns and in all settings, regardless of health status, income, or education, to enhance improvement in care quality and the best maternal and newborn outcomes.

References

Unicef. Unicef Data: Maternal mortality. UNICEF; 2019.

UNICEF, World Health Organization, World Bank Group, United Nations. A neglected tragedy: the global burden of stillbirths. United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation; 2020.

United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021. United Nations; 2021.

Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129–45.

Marmot M, Allen J, Bell R, Bloomer E, Goldblatt P. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. The Lancet. 2012;380(9846):1011–29.

Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. The Lancet. 2016;388(10056): 2176–92.

UNFPA, United Nations, World Health organization. The state of world’s midwifery. United Nations; 2021.

United Nations. the Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and adolescents’’ Health. United Nations; 2015.

Lancet Series. Midwifery An Executive Summary for The Lancet’s Series. Lancet; 2014.

International Confederation of Midwives. Essential Competencies for Midwifery Practice. ICM; 2019.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

Shaw D, Guise JM, Shah N, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Joseph K, Levy B, et al. Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care? The Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2282–95.

Attanasio L, Kozhimannil KB. Relationship Between Hospital-Level Percentage of Midwife-Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization. Journal Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63(1):14–22.

Van Lerberghe W, Matthews Z, Achadi E, Ancona C, Campbell J, Channon A, et al. Country experience with strengthening of health systems and deployment of midwives in countries with high maternal mortality. The Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1215–25.

The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Health-related SDGs 2021. IHME; 2021.

Solnes Miltenburg A, van Pelt S, Meguid T, Sundby J. Disrespect and abuse in maternity care: individual consequences of structural violence. Report Health Matters. 2018;26(53): 88–106.

Reed R, Sharman R, Inglis C. Women’s descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BioMed Central Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):21.

World Health Organization. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

World Health Organization. Midwives’ voices, midwives’ realities. Findings from a global consultation on providing quality midwifery care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

Prosser SJ, Barnett AG, Miller YD. Factors promoting or inhibiting normal birth. BioMed Central Pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):1-10.

Peters LL, Thornton C, de Jonge A, Khashan A, Tracy M, Downe S, et al. The effect of medical and operative birth interventions on child health outcomes in the first 28 days and up to 5 years of age: A linked data population-based cohort study. Birth. 2018 Dec;45(4):347–57.

Dahlen HG, Kennedy HP, Anderson CM, Bell AF, Clark A, Foureur M, et al. The EPIIC hypothesis: Intrapartum effects on the neonatal epigenome and consequent health outcomes. National institute of Health. 2013.

Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, de Bernis L, Di Renzo GC, Vidarte MFE, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155): 1286–7.

World Health Organization. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

Downe S, Finlayson K, Oladapo O, Bonet M, Gülmezoglu AM. What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review. Norhayati MN, editor. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(4): e0194906.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

Homer CSE, Friberg IK, Dias MAB, ten HoopeBender P, Sandall J, Speciale AM, et al. The projected effect of scaling up midwifery. The Lancet. 2014.

Bartlett L, Weissman E, Gubin R, Patton-Molitors R, Friberg IK. The Impact and Cost of Scaling up Midwifery and Obstetrics in 58 Low-and Middle-Income Countries. Mahal A, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6): e98550.

Bharj KK, Luyben A, Avery MD, Johnson PG, O׳Connell R, Barger MK, et al. An agenda for midwifery education: Advancing the state of the world׳s midwifery. Midwifery. 2016.

World Health Organization. Strengthening quality midwifery education for universal health coverage 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

Sudja R, Oumtanee A. Experiences of Being a Nurse Entrepreneur of a Nursing and Midwifery Clinic. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2019; 21(2): 241-51. (In Thai)

Downloads

Published

10-12-2023

How to Cite

1.
Siriwan T, Pansri S, Srichum D. Conceptual Framework Quality Maternal and Newborn Care. J Royal Thai Army Nurses [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 10 [cited 2024 Apr. 27];24(3):84-93. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JRTAN/article/view/258233

Issue

Section

Academic articles