The Effects of Self-stigma Program in Drugs Used Persons
Keywords:
Self-Stigma, Drug Used PersonsAbstract
This quasi-experimental research aimed to compare 1) The self-stigma of the drug users before and after completed the Self-stigma Reduction Program (SRP) and one month after completed the program 2) the self-stigma of the drug users who received the SRP and who received the usual care at one month after completed the program. The study was conducted in 46 injection drug users at the Drop in Center in Bangkok Metropolis. Randomly assigned 25 subjects into the SRP. The control group was 25 subjects. Research Instruments included the SRP, Self-Stigma Scale, and Self-Esteem Scale. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and t-test. The results were as follows: 1) the self-stigma of the drug users after and one month after completed the SRP were lower than before with the statistically significant .05 level 2) the self-stigma of the drug users who received the SRP were lower than who received the usual care at one month after completed the program with the statistically significant .05 level. The next research recommendation should be to study the effectiveness of the program in the population with other mental health problems. The program is constantly monitored and evaluated in order to guide the development of the program more effectively.
References
2. Global Commission on Drug Poliey. Advancing Drug Policy Reform: A new approach to discriminalization, 2016 report. Geneva; Switzerland. 2016. (In Thai)
3. Kanto, M. Size Estimation of Injecting Drug Users through the Network Scale-Up Method in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jul; 98 Suppl 6:S17-24.
4. Nation Statistical Office. Public Opinion Survey on the Implementation of the Narcotics Prevention and Remediation Action Plan. Bangkok; Nation Statistical Office. 2016.
5. Karl GH , Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Abbott RD, Shapiro TV. Neurobiological mechanisms in the transition from drug use to drug dependence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004; 27(4): 739-49.
6. Saengchanchai, P et al. Textbook of Addiction Psychiatry. Bangkok: Bangkok Press; 2006. (In Thai)
7. Nation Institute on Drug Abuse. Advancing Addiction Science: Health Consequence of Drug Misuse. NID: America; 2015.
8. Ahern J, Stuber J, GaleaS. Stigma discrimination and the health of illicit drug users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 88: 188-196.
9. Link BG, Struening EL, Rahav M, Phelan JC, Nuttbrock L. On stigma and its consequence: Evidence from a longitudinal of men with dual diagnoses of mental illness and substance abuse. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1997; 38: 177-190.
10. Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. London: Simon & Schuster, 1963.
11. Luoma JB, O’Hair AK, Kohenberg BS, Hayes SC, Fletcher L. The development and psychometric proprieties of a new measure of perceived stigma towards substance users. Substance Use and Misuse. 2010; 45: 47-57.
12. Schomerus G, Lucht M, Holzinger A, Matchinger H, Carta MG, Angermeyer MC. The stigma of alcohol dependence compared with other mental disorders. Alcohol addiction. 2011; 46: 105-112.
13. Nunsungnoen S., Rodkhamdee P., Suktrakul S. Selected Factors Related to Perceived stigma of Amphetamine Addiction [Master of Nursing Science]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2016.
14. Scioli GA, Carmona-Torres JA, Paniccia A, Battista A, Cavicchia L, Bishar RM. A study on the perception of the stigma related to drug use in a sample of Italians and Belgians. Psychology, Society, & Education. 2015; 7(1): 1-8.
15. Livingston JD, Mile T, Fang ML, Amari E. The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review. Addiction. 2012; 107: 39-50.
16. Dungjumpa B. The comparison of social stigmatization of narcotics among drug users camps treatment with the general public in Nam Phong district, Khon Kaen Province. Journal of Community Health Development. 2013; 3 (2): 201-211. (IN Thai)
17. Cunningham JA, Breslin FC. Only one in three people with alcohol abuse or dependence ever seek treatment. Addic Behav. 2004; 29: 221-223..
18. Brener L, Von Hippel W, Von Hipple C, Resnick I, Treloar C. Perceptions of discriminatory treatment by staff as predictors of drug treatment completion: utility of a mixed methods approach. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010; 29: 491-197.
19. Simmond L, Coomber R. Injecting drug users: a stigmatised and stigmatising population. Int J Drug Policy. 2009; 20: 121-130.
20. Major B, O’Brien Lt. The social psychology of stigma. Ann Rev Psychol. 2005; 56: 393-421.
21. Crocker J, Major B, Steele C. Social stigma. In The handbook of social psychology, Vol 2 (4th ed.). New York, McGraw-Hill; 1998, pp. 504-553.
22. Livingston JD, Boyd JE. Correlated and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Social Science and Medicine. 2010; 71: 2150-2161.
23. Luoma JB, Kulesza M, Hayes SC, Kohlenberg B, Larimer M. Stigma predicts residential treatment length for substance use disorder. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2014; 40(3): 206-212.
24. Schomerus G, Corrigan PW, Klauer T, Kuwert P, Freyberger HJ, Lucht M. Self-stigma in alcohol dependence: consequences for drinking-refusal self-efficacy. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 114: 12-17.
25. Budpanya Y. Nurses’s Role in Alcohol Dependence Based on Motivation Interview Model. Journal of the Royal Thai Army Nurses. 2017; 18(3): 1-8. (in Thai)
26. Corrigan PW, Watson AC, Barr L. The self-stigma of mental illness implications for self- esteem and self-efficacy. Jonual of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2006; 25: 875-884.
27. Birchwood M, Trower P, Brunet K, Gilbert P, Lqbal Z, Jackson C. Social anxiety and the shame of psychosis: A study in first episode psychosis. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2007; 45 (15):1025-1037.
28. Holdsworth L, Hing N, Breen H. Exploring women’s problem gambling: A review of the literature. International Gambling Syudies. 2012; 12 (12): 199-213.
29. Mittal D, Sillivan G, Chekuri L, Allee E, Corrigan PW. Empirical Studies of Self- Stigma Reduction Strategies: A Critical Review of the Literature. Psychiatric Services. 2012; 63 (10): 974-981.
30. Gould D, et al. Visual Analogu Scale (VAS). Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2001; 10: 697-706.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
บทความหรือข้อคิดเห็นใดใดที่ปรากฏในวารสารพยาบาลทหารบกเป็นวรรณกรรมของผู้เขียน ซึ่งบรรณาธิการหรือสมาคมพยาบาลทหารบก ไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารพยาบาลทหารบก
The ideas and opinions expressed in the Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses are those of the authors and not necessarily those
of the editor or Royal Thai Army Nurses Association.
