The Effectiveness of a Digital Break Reminder Based on the 20-20-20 Rule on Computer Vision Syndrome among Hospital Support Staff
Keywords:
computer vision syndrome, 20-20-20 rule, digital break reminder, hospital support staffAbstract
Objectives: Hospital support staff are at high risk of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) due to prolonged computer use. While the 20-20-20 rule is a standard recommendation for eye rest, adherence is often poor without active reminders. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a digital break reminder software , based on the 20-20-20 rule, in reducing CVS severity among hospital support staff. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 43 support staff members working at a hospital in Bangkok, who used computers for more than 4 hours daily. The EyeLeo software was installed on participants' computers to provide automatic break reminders every 20 minutes for a duration of 3 weeks. CVS severity was assessed using the Thai version of the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q) at baseline, week 2, and week 3. Data were analyzed using Repeated Measures ANOVA. Results: The study found that the mean CVS severity score significantly decreased after the intervention (p < 0.001). The prevalence of CVS dropped from 100% at baseline to 97.7% at week 2, and significantly further to 41.9% at week 3. These findings suggest that consistent use of the reminder software over time leads to better symptom relief. Conclusion: The application of the 20-20-20 rule via digital reminder software is effective in reducing both the severity and prevalence of CVS. It is a practical and low-cost intervention recommended for occupational health promotion in hospital settings.
References
Kahal F, Al Darra A, Torbey A. Computer vision syndrome: a comprehensive literature review. Future Sci OA 2025;11(1):2476923.
Almuqrashi A, Al-Noumani H, Al-Abri F, Al-Hinai H, Bani Oraba H. The prevalence of computer vision syndrome and associated factors among university students in Oman: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2025;25(1):2668.
Anbesu EW, Lema AK. Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2023;13(1):1801.
Wangsan K, Upaphong P, Assavanopakun P, Sapbamrer R, Sirikul W, Kitro A, et al. Self-reported computer vision syndrome among Thai university students in virtual classrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic: prevalence and associated factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(7):3996.
Tingsa T, Chaikittiporn C, Pongpan S. Predictive factors affecting severe computer vision syndrome among support staff at universities in Lampang, Thailand. Open Public Health J 2025;18.
Castro VYA, García TAM, Gavilán BKY, Rojas BRS, Miguel KAZ, García JSC. Computer vision syndrome and associated factors among administrative workers at a private university, 2024. Multidiscip Sci J 2026;8(4):2026275.
Heiting G. Worker productivity and computer vision syndrome [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2026 Feb 6]. Available from: https://shorturl.asia/QjpUP
Joy J. New report estimates $151 billion in health system, productivity costs due to unmanaged screen time in 2023 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Feb 6]. Available from: https://shorturl.asia/5wTA6
Wilda RD, Permatasari H, Rachmawati U. The effectiveness of the 20-20-20 rule in managing computer vision syndrome among workers: a systematic review. Indones J Glob Health Res 2025;7(3):305–10.
Alghamdi W, Alrasheed SH. Impact of an educational intervention using the 20/20/20 rule on computer vision syndrome. Afr Vision Eye Health 2020;79(1).
Narmatha S, Balaji P, Muthamizhselvi M. A study to assess the effectiveness of 20-20-20 rule to prevent eye strain among IT workers at selected IT company, Puducherry. Quest J Med Dent Sci Res 2024;11(6):154-9.
Barzegari S, ArabKermani Z, Mahmoudvand Z, Arpaci I, Shabani F, Najafi AH. Prevalence and contributing factors of computer vision syndrome among university students in Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol 2025;25(1):501.
Rosenfield M. Computer vision syndrome: a review of ocular causes and potential treatments. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011;31(5):502–15.
Daruis DDI, Osman H, Sukadarin EH, Mustaffa F, Ardimansyah H, Sain ZM, et al. Increasing blink rates: reducing dried eye symptoms with eye rest-break application. MJPHM 2020;20(Suppl 1):186–91.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). eTools: computer workstations – workstation components – monitors [Internet]. 2000 [cited 2025 Dec 5]. Available from: https://shorturl.asia/Z2yMl
กรมสวัสดิการและคุ้มครองแรงงาน. ประกาศกรมสวัสดิการและคุ้มครองแรงงาน เรื่อง มาตรฐานความเข้มของแสงสว่าง. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่มที่ 135, ตอนพิเศษ 39 ง (ลงวันที่ 21 กุมภาพันธ์ 2561).
Talens-Estarelles C, Cerviño A, García-Lázaro S, Fogelton A, Sheppard A, Wolffsohn JS. The effects of breaks on digital eye strain, dry eye and binocular vision: testing the 20-20-20 rule. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2023;46(2):101744.
Kumar S, Pandey H. Impact of 20-20-20 rule and daily reminders in relieving digital eye strain. Int J Sci Healthc Res 2024;9(2):339-51.
Domkin D, Forsman M, Richter HO. Effect of ciliary-muscle contraction force on trapezius muscle activity during computer mouse work. Eur J Appl Physiol 2019;119(2):389-97.
Aggarwala KRG. Ocular accommodation, intraocular pressure, development of myopia and glaucoma: role of ciliary muscle, choroid and metabolism. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 2020;9(1):66-70.
Cardona G, García C, Serés C, Vilaseca M, Gispets J. Blink rate, blink amplitude, and tear film integrity during dynamic visual display terminal tasks. Curr Eye Res 2011;36(3):190-7.
Hirota M, Uozato H, Kawamorita T, Shibata Y, Yamamoto S. Effect of incomplete blinking on tear film stability. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90(7):650-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 สมาคมเวชศาสตร์ป้องกันแห่งประเทศไทย

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ลงพิมพ์ในวารสารเวชศาสตร์ป้องกันแห่งประเทศไทย ถือเป็นผลงานวิชาการ งานวิจัย วิเคราะห์ วิจารณ์ เป็นความเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้นิพนธ์ กองบรรณาธิการไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วยเสมอไปและผู้นิพนธ์จะต้องรับผิดชอบต่อบทความของตนเอง