Development of Thai’s sensory patterns assessment tool for adolescents and adults
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this research was to develop sensory assessment tools for adolescents and adults and to examine psychometric properties of the assessment tool, including content validity, internal consistency and test-retest validity. The content validity was assessed by the index of item-objective congruence (IOC) from 5 experts.
Methods: The sample group was selected by multistage sampling. A total of 400 participants aged more than 15 years old in Chiang Mai province were recruited for examining internal consistency and 40 participants were recruited for examine test retest reliability.
Results: This assessment consisted of 2 modules: a 50-item sensory preferences module that was reduced from 60 items and a 60-item sensory threshold. Each module was comprised of 6 sensory modalities: sight, sound, smell & taste, touch, proprioceptive and vestibular. Each assessment took 5-10 minutes to complete. The index of item-objective congruence (IOC) was between 0.60-1.00 for module 1 and module 2. The internal consistency using the Cronbach’s alpha was .89 for module 1 and .79 for module 2. The test-retest reliability using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was .91 for module 1 and .92 for module 2.
Conclusions: These findings indicated that the sensory patterns assessment tool is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating person’s sensory pattern.
Downloads
Article Details
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวิทยาลัยพยาบาลบรมราชชนนี จังหวัดนนทบุรี
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับวิทยาลัยพยาบาลบรมราชชนนี จังหวัดนนทบุรี และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่น ในวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใด ๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
References
Siegel A, Sapru HN. Essential neuroscience: Holistic approach. 3rded. China: Wolters Hluwer; 2015.
Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T. Principles of neural science. 5thed. New York: McGrow-Hill; 2013.
Dunn W. The Role of Sensory Processing in the Everyday Lives of Older Adults. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2003;23(3):99-106.
Dunn W. Living sensationally: Understanding your senses. London: Jessica Kingsley; 2008.
Chang FY, Huang H C, Lin K C, Lin L C. The effect of a music programme during lunchtime on the problem behavior of the older residents with dementia at an institution in Taiwan. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(7-8):939-48.
Wu MC, Sung HC, Lee WL, Smith GD. The effects of light therapy on depression and sleep disruption in older adults in a long-term care facility. Int J Nurs Pract. 2015;21(5):653-9.
Karadag E, Samancioglu S, Ozden D, Bakir E. Effects of aromatherapy on sleep quality and anxiety of patients. Nurs Crit Care. 2015;22(2):105-12.
Fava L, Strauss K. Multi-sensory room: Comparing effects of the Snozelen and the stimulus preference environment on the behavior of adults with profound mental retardation. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(1):160-71.
Chalmers A, Harrison S, Mollison K,
Molloy N, Gray K. Establishing sensory-based approaches in mental health inpatient care: A multidisciplinary approach. Australas Psychiatry. 2012;20(1):35-9.
Maseda A, Cibeira N, Lorenzo-López L, González-Abraldes I, Buján A, Labra C, et al. Multisensory Stimulation and Individualized Music Sessions on Older Adults with Severe Dementia: Effects on Mood, Behavior and Biomedical Parameters. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(4):1415-25.
Brown C, Tollefson N, Dunn W, Cromwell R, Filion D. The Adult Sensory Profile: Measuring Patterns of Sensory Processing. Am J of Occup Ther. 2001;55(1):75-82.
Dunn W. Sensory profile: User’s manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1999.
Dunn W. Infant toddler sensory profile: User’s manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2002.
Dunn W. Sensory profile school companion: User’s manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson; 2006.
Glennon T, Miller-Kuhaneck H, Henry DA, Parham LD, Ecker C. Sensory processing measure manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services; 2007.
Brown C, Dunn W. The adolescent/adult sensory profile: User’s manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2002.
Collier L. The sensory assessment and profiling tool. UK: Rompa;2003.
Srikhamjak T, Sawlom S, Munkhetvit P, Apikimonkon H. Thai Sensory Profile Assessment Tool. Chiang Mai University; 2550. (in Thai).
Jittrong P. Sensory and Leisure Interest Profile in Late Teenagers, Mueang District, Chiang Mai Province [Dissertation]. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University; 2012. (in Thai).
Kongngern T, Srikhamjak T. Relationship between sensory patterns and stresses of relapsed alcohol dependence clients in Suansaranroom Psychiatric Hospital, Suratthani Province. The journal of Occupational Therapist Association of Thailand. 2011;16(1):26-44. (in Thai).
Kispredarborisuthi B. Formulating research instrument. 7thed. Bangkok: Srianant; 2010. (in Thai).
Ellis P D. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 May 9]; Available from: https://epdf.pub/the-essential-guide-to-effect-sizes-statistical-power-meta-analysis-and-the-inte.html.
Vanichbuncha K. Statistic for Research. 11sted. Bangkok: Samlada; 2017. (in Thai).
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundation clinical research: Applications to practice. 3rded. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc; 2009.
Cicchetti DV,Sparrow SA. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic. 1981;86(2):127-37.
