A STUDY OF NURSING OUTCOME INDICATORS IN CANCER PATIENTS, CHULABHORN HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To study nursing outcome indicator in cancer patients, Chulabhorn hospital in each aspect, and to study sub-items in each aspect of nursing outcome indicator in cancer patients, Chulabhorn hospital
Research Design: Descriptive research using Delphi technique
Methods: There were three steps: firstly, all 18 selected experts. all experts were asked to described about nursing outcome indicator in cancer patients, Chulabhorn hospital: Secondly, the data gained from the first stage was analyzed the content in order to create rating scale questionnaire which experts gave some comment on the level of importance of each question: thirdly, expert’s comment was calculated to find median and the interquartile range and then the questionnaire was sent to the experts for confirmation. After that, the data was computed for the median and the interquartile range to summarize the results.
Results: The nursing outcome indicator in cancer patients, Chulabhorn hospital were congruent with the experts with 42 items, namely 39 items with the highest level of importance and 3 with the high level of importance. These were classified into six categories as follows: 1) Safety form complications in oncology surgery has 9 sub-items 2) Safety form side effects of chemotherapy has 8 sub-items 3) Safety form Radiation therapy has 6 sub-items 4) Safety form complications in treatment and pathology of the diseases has 8 sub-items 5) Relief form pain has 6 sub-items and 6) The responses of physical, mental, social and spiritual has 5 sub-items.
Conclusion: The results can be applied as a guideline for nursing administrators in determining appropriate nursing outcome indicator in cancer patients, Chulabhorn hospital.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ลิขสิทธิ์ของบทความที่ตีพิมพ์เป็นของวารสารพยาบาลศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย ทั้งฉบับตีพิมพ์เป็นรูปเล่มและเอกสารออนไลน์
References
Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2013;85(4):904-11.
Behrenbeck JG, Timm JA, Griebenow LK, Demmer KA. Nursing‐sensitive outcome reliability testing
in a tertiary care setting. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2005;16(1):14-20.
Griffiths P, Richardson A, Blackwell R. Outcomes sensitive to nursing service quality in ambulatory
cancer chemotherapy: systematic scoping review. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2012;16(3):238-46.
Irwin KE, Greer JA, Khatib J, Temel JS, Pirl WF. Early palliative care and metastatic non-small cell
lung cancer: potential mechanisms of prolonged survival. Chronic respiratory disease. 2013 Feb;10(1):35-47.
Milani A, Mauri S, Gandini S, Magon G. Oncology Nursing Minimum Data Set (ONMDS): can we
hypothesize a set of prevalent Nursing Sensitive Outcomes (NSO) in cancer patients?. ecancermedicalscience. 2013;7.
Querleu D, Ray-Coquard I, Classe JM, et al. Quality indicators in ovarian cancer surgery: report from
the French Society of Gynecologic Oncology (Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Gynecologique, SFOG). Annals of oncology. 2013;24(11):2732-9.
Tod AM, Redman J, McDonnell A, Borthwick D, White J. Lung cancer treatment rates and the role of
the lung cancer nurse specialist: a qualitative study. BMJ open. 2015;5(12):e008587.