The Effect of Health Teaching on Self-Practice Among Persons with Colorectal Cancer Risk
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: 1) To study of the self-practice before undergoing to colonoscopy among persons with
colorectal cancer risk who received the health teaching program and 2) compare the self-practice
before undergoing to colonoscopy among persons with colorectal cancer risk who received the
health teaching program and those who received conventional nursing care.
Design: Quasi-experimental research, posttest only design.
Method: The samples group is persons with colorectal cancer risk in the range of age between
18-59 years old who was undergoing colonoscopy at Surin provincial hospital, Thailand.
The sample were consisted of 44 patients and assigned to the experimental and control group
(22 persons for each group).They were matched by gender,age and education level. The
experimental group received the health teaching program that was created by Alice while the
control group received conventional nursing care. Data were collected by 1) the demographic
data form, 2) Self-practice questionnaire before underwent colonoscopy.The Kuder Richardson’s
reliability index was 0.80. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Mann-Whitney
U test.
Finding:1) After receiving the health teaching program before undergoing colonoscopy, 17 persons
(77.3%) answered 2 items with the least number of self-practices and 22 persons (100 %) answered
13 items with totally completed number of self- practices. 2) The mean score of self-practice
among persons with colorectal cancer risk who received health teaching program were higher
than the control group who received conventional nursing care in significantly different at the
.05 level.
Conclusion: The program has been shown to be effective on improving self-practice before
colonoscopy in persons with colorectal cancer risk who were received colonoscopy
Article Details
ลิขสิทธิ์ของบทความที่ตีพิมพ์เป็นของวารสารพยาบาลศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย ทั้งฉบับตีพิมพ์เป็นรูปเล่มและเอกสารออนไลน์
References
National Cancer Institute. Hospital-Base cancer registry 2018.Bangkok: National Cancer Institute Departmentof Medical Services Ministry of Public Health Thailand. 2018. (In Thai)
Guo X, Yang Z, ZhaoL, Leung F, Luo H, Kang X,etal.Enhanced instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2017;
(1):90-7.
Hassan C,BretthauerM,KaminskiMF,Polkowski M, Rembacken B, Saunders B, et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)guideline.Endoscopy 2013;45(2):142-50.
Modi C, DePasquale JR, DiGiacomo WS, Malinowski JE, EngelhardtK, ShaikhSN, Baddoura WJ, et al. Impact of patient education on quality of bowel preparationinoutpatientcolonoscopies. Quality in Primary Care 2009;17(6):
-404.
RomeroRV, Mahadeva S. Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. World Journal of
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2013;5(2): 39-46.
Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, Fanelli RD, Hyman N, Shen B, et al. A consensus documenton bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force fromthe AmericanSocietyof Colonand Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinaland EndoscopicSurgeons (SAGES).SurgicalEndoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques 2006;20(7): 1147-60.
McLachlan S-A, Clements A, Austoker J. Patients’ experiences and reported barriers tocolonoscopyinthescreening context—A systematic review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 2012;86(2):137-46.
Serper M, Gawron AJ, Smith SG, Pandit AA, Dahlke AR, Bojarski EA, et al. Patient factorsthataffect qualityofcolonoscopy preparation. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2014;12(3):451-7.
BhanthumkomolP,SiramolpiwatS,Vilaichone RK. Incidence and predictors of inadequate bowel preparation before elective colonoscopy in Thai patients. AsianPacificJournalofCancerPrevention 2014;15(24):10763-8.
Liu X,Luo H, ZhangL,LeungFW,Liu Z,Wang X,etal.Telephone-based re-education onthe day beforecolonoscopyimproves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detectionrate:a prospective,
colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study. Gut2014;63(1):125-30.
WongtaweeS,BoonwiriyaS,Boonpipattanapong T, Sriwanayos K, Tongwong M. Comparison of efficacy between low residue diet in colonoscopic bowel preparation in surgical clinic. Songkla Med J 2016;34(2):61-70. (In Thai)
Sharara AI,ElReda ZD, Harb AH, AbouFadel CG, Sarkis FS, Chalhoub JM, et al. The burdenof bowel preparationsin patients undergoingelectivecolonoscopy.United European Gastroenterology Journal
;4(2):314-8.
LebwohlB,KastrinosF, Glick M,Rosenbaum AJ, Wang T, Neugut AI. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associatedwithearlyrepeatcolonoscopy.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011;73(6): 1207-14.
Fisher DA, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Cash BD, Decker GA, Early DS, et al. Complicationsofcolonoscopy.Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74(4):745-52.
Roopchang S. The Effectiveness of nursing informationonhealthoutcomesinadult patient with cancer: A meta-analysis [Master degree, Nursing science program]. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University; 2007. (In Thai)
Lorenzo-ZunigaV, Moreno deVegaV, MarinI, Barbera M,BoixJ. Improvingthe quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using a smart phone application: A randomized trial. Digestive Endoscopy 2015;27(5):590-5.
Alice MK. Teaching for Health. 3ed. China: Elsevier; 2004. 232 p.
Katseesung P, Asdornwised U, Pinyopaskul W. Effects of continuing care program on quality of bowel preparation and anxiety in who receiving ambulatory colonoscopy.Journalof NursingScience 2015; 33(3):61-73. (In Thai)
WongwanichS.,Wiratchai N.Thesis Guidance. Bankok: Chulalongkorn University press;2003. (In Thai)