Learning outcomes of nursing students in nursing practice according to the Thai Qualification Framework for Higher Education

Authors

  • Soiy Anusornteerakul Faculty of Nursing, Ratchathani University, Udonthani Campus
  • Raweewan Paokanha Faculty of Nursing, Ratchathani University, Udonthani Campus
  • Suphaphak Hanklar Faculty of Nursing, Ratchathani University, Udonthani Campus
  • Anchalee Ounkaew Faculty of Nursing, Ratchathani University, Udonthani Campus
  • Natthakul Buengmoom Faculty of Nursing, Ratchathani University, Udonthani Campus

Keywords:

learning outcome, nursing student, clinical teacher, Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education

Abstract

This descriptive research aimed to study and compare the learning outcomes of nursing students in nursing practice according to the Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education according to the assessment of clinical teachers and nursing students. The sample consisted of 27 clinical teachers and 30 fourth-year nursing students who will graduate in the academic year 2022 of the Faculty of Nursing, Private University. The instrument used was a learning outcomes assessment form according to six aspects of the Qualifications Framework for Higher Education, with 5 five-point Likert Scale. Learning outcomes were classified according to the criterion average scores into 3 levels: high, moderate, and low. Reliability test of the assessment form obtained the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of clinical teachers and students was equal to .96. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and t test.

The results showed that the clinical teachers assessed the overall learning outcomes of the students at a moderate level. The learning outcomes of each aspect showed that the ethical and moral aspect, and the interpersonal skills and responsibility aspect were at high levels. The other aspects were at moderate levels. The students assessed their overall learning outcomes and all aspects at high levels. Clinical teachers rated the student’s learning outcomes of knowledge and professional skills at moderate levels, whereas students rated these at high levels. Comparison on the assessment of learning outcomes between clinical teachers and students was found that there were statistically significant differences in all aspects and overall. Important recommendation focus on moderate-level learning outcomes that should be taken into consideration to find strategies to manage teaching and learning in order to increase learning outcomes.

References

Netimetee S, Duangsamran D. Factors influencing academic achievement in maternal-child nursing and midwifery 1 of nursing students, Faculty of Nursing, Private University. Udonthani Hospital Medical Journal 2021;29(3):204-20. (in Thai)

Committee on Higher Education Standards. Announcement of the commission on higher education standards 2022. Bangkok: Office of the Higher Education Standards Commission, Ministry of Education; 2022. (in Thai)

Phimchaisai P, Wongchantorn N. The factors influencing achievement of practicum in nursing care for mother, infant, and midwifery 1 of nursing students at a Private University in Nakhon Pathom Province. Journal of The Royal Thai Army Nurses 2018;19(1):154-63. (in Thai)

Nursing Council. Bachelor of nursing program: Nursing council model program 2021. Nonthaburi: Nursing Council; 2021. (in Thai)

Surjadi M, Stringari-Murray S, Saxe JM. Entrustable professional activities in nurse practitioner education. J Nurse Pract 2019;15(5):97–102.

Franklin N, Melville P. Competency assessment tools: An exploration of the pedagogical issues facing competency assessment for nurses in the clinical environment. Collegian 2015;22(1):25-31.

El-Haddad C, Damodaran A, McNeil HP, Hu W. The ABCs of entrustable professional activities: An overview of entrustable professional activities’in medical education. Int Medical J 2016; 46(9):1006-10.

Al-Moteri M. Entrustable professional activities in nursing: A concept analysis. Int J Nurs Sci 2020;7(3):277–84.

Nursing Council. Regulations of the nursingb council on approval of professional nursing and midwifery education programs 2020. Nonthaburi: Nursing Council; 2020. (in Thai) 10. Bureau of Higher Education Standards and Evaluation. Standard criteria for higher education curriculum 2015 and related standards higher education level. Bangkok: Office of the Higher Education Standards Commission, Ministry of Education; 2017. (in Thai)

Bloom BS. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw–Hill; 1971.

Singhatadgid W, Sombatkaew N. Evaluations of teaching-learning strategies in the practicum of the fundamental of nursing course, The Thai Red Cross College of Nursing. Thai Red Cross Nursing Journal 2019;12(1):177-93. (in Thai)

Kamdaeng P. Supervision in clinical practice regarding expectations of nursing students. Journal of Nurses Association of Thailand Northern Region 2021;27(1):17-28. (in Thai)

Intaranongpai S, Kotchakot J. The learning outcome under the qualification framework for higher education (TOF) in community nursing practicum subject, bachelor of nursing science. Journal of The Police Nurses 2017;9(2):104- 14. (in Thai)

Benner P. From novice to expert: excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. California: Addison-Wesley; 1984.

Kooariyakul A. Clinical learning assessment of nursing students. Journal of Boromarajonani College Nursing Bangkok 2017;33(2):179- 87. (in Thai)

Kamdaeng P, Jaijoy K. The expectation and actuality of learning outcome in SN. 282 fundamentals of nursing practicum among second year nursing students, McCormick Faculty of Nursing, Payap University. JNATNO 2019; 25(1):36-48. (in Thai)

Chaiboonruang T, Yimyam S. International nursing programme students’ pregnancy care efficacy. Thai Journal of Nursing Council 2013; 28(3):55-67. (in Thai)

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Anusornteerakul soiy, Paokanha R, Hanklar S, Ounkaew A, Buengmoom N. Learning outcomes of nursing students in nursing practice according to the Thai Qualification Framework for Higher Education. JNSH [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 May 13];46(3):131-40. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nah/article/view/263937

Issue

Section

Research Article