Development of dyspnea assessment tool for patient receiving palliative care.
Keywords:dyspnea, patients receiving palliative care, assessment of dyspnea
The objective of this research was to develop a tool to assess dyspnea in patients receiving palliative care, to check the quality of the content validity and the reliability and usability testing tools. The research methodology consists of 3 phases as follows : Phase 1 defines dimensions, sub-dimension, definition and create questions. The sample consisted of 15 palliative care patients and 15 professional nurses with experience in caring for patients. Data were analyzed by content analysis. Phase 2, to determine the quality of the tools. Sample Consisted of 5 experts and 52 patients receiving palliative care. Analyze the data by content validity index and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. And Phase 3 attenuates the details, updated questions and usability testing of tools. The sample consisted of 30 palliative care patients and 30 professional nurses with experience in caring for patients. Analyze the data by usability index.
The result of the study has 3 sets of tools as follows: 1) Assessment tool for risk of developing dyspnea, consisting of 10 questions. 2) The assessment tool of dyspnea in patients receiving palliative care, consisting of 24 questions. And 3) The assessment tool for dyspnea in patients who cannot communicate, consisting of 10 questions. All tools are in acceptable content validity (SCVI: 0.96, 1, 0.96 and ICVI: 0.8-1, 1, 0.8-1 respectively), reliability is acceptable to excellent (α Cronbach: 0.76, 0.93, 0.88 respectively), usability testing is acceptable (UI : 0.89, 0.86, 0.93 respectively).
2. Pesola GR, Ahsan H. Dyspnea as an independent predictor of mortality. Clin Respir J [Internet]. 2016 Mar [cited 2019 Feb 18];10(2):142–52. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25070878
3. American Thoracic Society. Dyspnea: Mechanisms, assessment, and management: A consensus statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):321–40.
4. Simon ST, Altfelder N, Alt-Epping B, Bausewein C, Weingärtner V, Voltz R, et al. Is breathlessness what the professional says it is? Analysis of patient and professionals’ assessments from a German nationwide register. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(7):1825–32.
5. Sant hathirat. Good dead [Internet]. Thaihealthbook. 2552 [cited 2019 Sep 8]. Available from: https://www.doctor.or.th/clinic/detail/7195
6. Baker KM, DeSanto-Madeya S, Banzett RB. Routine dyspnea assessment and documentation: Nurses’ experience yields wide acceptance. BMC Nurs. 2017;16(1):3.
7. Moody LE, McMillan S. Dyspnea and quality of life indicators in hospice patients and their caregivers. Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2018 Dec 9];1:1–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC155633/pdf/1477-7525-1-9.pdf
8. Moens K, Higginson IJ, Harding R. Are there differences in the prevalence of palliative care-related problems in people living with advanced cancer and eight non-cancer conditions? a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):660–77.
9. Gysels MH, Higginson IJ. The lived experience of breathlessness and its implications for care: A qualitative comparison in cancer, COPD, heart failure and MND. BMC Palliat Care [Internet]. 2011;10(1):15. Available from: https://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-684X/10/15
10. Kamal AH, Maguire JM, Wheeler JL, Currow DC, Abernethy AP. Dyspnea Review for the Palliative Care Professional: Assessment, Burdens, and Etiologies. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(10):1167–72.
11. Kendrick KR, Baxi SC, Smith RM. Usefulness of the modified 0-10 Borg scale in assessing the degree of dyspnea in patients with COPD and asthma. J Emerg Nurs [Internet]. 2000 Jun 1 [cited 2019 Sep 8];26(3):216–22. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S009917670090093X
12. Gift AG, Narsavage G. Validity of the numeric rating scale as a measure of dyspnea. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7(3):200–4.
13. Richardson LA, Jones GW. A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Curr Oncol. 2009;16(1):53–64.
14. Cancer O, Management S, Oncology P. Cancer Care Ontario ’ s Symptom Management Guide-to-Practice : Loss of Appetite. 2012;(June).
15. Henoch I, Bergman B, Gaston-Johansson F. Validation of a Swedish Version of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale. J Pain Symptom Manage [Internet]. 2006;31(4):353–61. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885392406001394
16. Ghosh D, Rzehak P, Elliott MW, Windisch W. Validation of the english severe respiratory insufficiency questionnaire. Eur Respir J. 2012;40(2):408–15.
17. Migliore Norweg A, Whiteson J, Demetis S, Rey M. A new functional status outcome measure of dyspnea and anxiety for adults with lung disease: The dyspnea management questionnaire. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26(6):395–404.
18. Han JN, Xiong CM, Yao W, Fang QH, Zhu YJ, Cheng XS, et al. Multiple dimensions of cardiopulmonary dyspnea. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011;124(20):3220–6.
19. Banzett RB, O’Donnell CR, Guilfoyle TE, Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Meek PM, et al. Multidimensional dyspnea profile: An instrument for clinical and laboratory research. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(6):1681–91.
20. Zhuang Q, Yang GM, Neo SH-S, Cheung YB. Validity, Reliability, and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale for Assessment of Dyspnea in Adult Palliative Care Patients. J Pain Symptom Manage [Internet]. 2019 Feb [cited 2019 Aug 14];57(2):304–10. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30391404
21. Campbell ML. Psychometric Testing of a Respiratory Distress Observation Scale. J Palliat Med. 2008;
22. Campbell ML, Kero KK, Templin TN. Mild, moderate, and severe intensity cut-points for the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale. Hear Lung J Acute Crit Care. 2017;46(1):14–7.
23. Sangchart B. Nursing care of dying patients and patients after death. Khon Kaen University; 2017. 45 p.
24. Labouvie EW. Descriptive Developmental Research: Why Only Time? J Genet Psychol [Internet]. 1975 Jun 1;126(2):289–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1975.10532344
25. Sangchart B. The process of creating and developing tools to evaluate the performance of nursing care for patients receiving palliative care. In Khon Kean: Faculthy of nursing, Khon Kean University; 2014. p. 14.
26. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194–7.
27. Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing, 2nd ed. The handbook of psychological testing, 2nd ed. Florence, KY, US: Taylor & Frances/Routledge; 1993. vii, 744–vii, 744.
28. Darren G, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. 4th ed. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2011. 231 p.
29. Genes N, Kim MS, Thum FL, Rivera L, Beato R, Song C, et al. Usability Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Geriatric ED Pain Treatment. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(1):128–42.
30. Lopez KD, Febretti A, Stifter J, Johnson A, Wilkie DJ, Keenan G. Toward a More Robust and Efficient Usability Testing Method of Clinical Decision Support for Nurses Derived From Nursing Electronic Health Record Data. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2017;28(4):211–8.
31. Lloyd-Williams M, Spiller J, Ward J. Which depression screening tools should be used in palliative care? Palliat Med [Internet]. 2003 Jan 1;17(1):40–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216303pm664oa
How to Cite
The Journal of Nursing Science and Health is copyright holder of published articles. Distributions of articles published in Journal of Nursing Science and Health including online, photocopying which is not for teaching-learning purpose, publication submission elsewhere are prohibited except obtaining permission from the Journal of Nursing Science and Health.