Family well- being among skipped generation family at Luplao sub- district, Phuphan district, Sakon Nakhon province.
This descriptive study was aimed to explore the skipped generation families well-being. The sampling was 150 families, who live at Luplao sub - district, Phuphan district, Sakon Nakhon province. The information was collected by the questionnaires which were developed by the researcher. The information was analyzed by the average, percentage, standard deviation, and the content analysis. This study found a medium level of skipped generation family well- being ( = 1.96, S.D. = 0.49 ). Community interaction showed that the highest score was a good level ( = 2.32, S.D. = 0.10 ), while basic needs response showed the lowest score was a medium level ( = 1.76, S.D. = 0.09 ). This information would provide family nurse practitioners and related organizations more understanding about skipped generation families and plan to promote the family well-being.
2. Photisita C.Thai family and household changes : what we don’t know? [database on the Internet] 2011. [cited 2016 April 20] Available from : https://www2.ipsr.mahidol.ac.th/ ConferenceVII/ Download/2011- Article- 02.pdf. (in Thai)
3. Narongchai W. Pattern of co-resident of skipped – generation in Isan migrant family. Khon Kaen university research journal 2011; 11(3):101-110.(in Thai)
4. Hanson S M H, Boyd S T. Family health carenursing : theory practice and research 1996. The united states of America : F.A. Davis company. 6-37.
5. The U.S. Census Bureau. Generations united: GrandFacts: Data, Interpretation, and Implications for Caregivers [database on the Internet] 2009.[cited 2015 December 25] Available From:https://www.brookdalefoundation.net/RAPP/RAPPpublications/GrandFacts %2Data%20Interpretation%20and%20Implications%20for%20Caregivers.pdf.
6. The U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey. [database on the Internet] 2013. [cited 2015 December 25] Available From : https://factfinder2.census.gov.
7. National statistical office. Labor force survey, 3rd Quarter, 2013. Bangkok : National statistical Office.(in Thai)
8. Knodel J, Teerawichitchainan B, Prachuabmoh V, Pothisiri W. The situation of Thailand’s older population : An update based on the 2014 survey of older persons in Thailand, 2015. Michican : Institute for social research, University of Michican.
9. Jampaklay A, Vapattanawong P, Tangchonlatip K, Richter K, Ponpai N, Hayeeteh C. Children living apart from parents due to internal migration (CLAIM), 2012. Nakhon Pathom : Institute for population and social research, Mahidol university. (in Thai)
10.Nanthamongkolchai S, Munsawaengsup C, Nanthamongkolchai C. Influence of grandparents who are grandparent on child development 6-12 years old.National demographic conference, 2007. 405-413. (in Thai)
11. Klayklueng W, Deoisres W, Wacharasin C. Factors associated with parenting stress among grandmothers raising their infant grandchildren. The journal of faculty of nursing Burapha university 2018; 26(1): 11-19. (in Thai)
12. Shakya H B, Usita P M, Eisenberg C, Wenton J, Lile S. Family Well-Being Concerns of Grandparents in Skipped Generation Families. Journal of Gerontogical Social Work 2012; 55(1): 39- 54.
13. Leder S, Nicholson L, Torres E. Grandparent Raising Grandchildren : Stress , Social Support, and Health Outcomes. Journal of Family Nursing. 2007; 13(3), 332-352.
14. Yodthong D, Seeherunwong A, Kongsuriyanavin W, Pornchaikate Au Yong A. Correlation between age, care giving burden feelings and depressive symptoms in grandparents reasing their grandchildren. Thai journal of nursing council. 2014; 29(1): 108-121. (in Thai)
15. Hughes M E, Waite L J, Lapierre T A, Luo Y. All in the Family: The Impact of Caring For Grandchildren on Grandparents’ Health. Journal of Geronto B PsycholSci Soc. 2007; 62(2),108-119.
16. Kotchabhakdi N, Isaranurug S, Phuphaibul R, Tejaqupta C. Research report compiled between 1998-2009 : Education project for developing indicators “Family well-being”, 2009.National institute for child and family development, Mahidol university. (in Thai)
17. McKeown K, Pratschke J, Haase T. Family well-being : what makes a difference?. Report to the Ceifin Centre. Insights and Initiative for a Changing Society,Town Hall, Shannon, County Clare. 2003.
18. Wollny I, Apps J, Henricson C. Can government measure family wellbeing?: a literature review. 2010. London : Family & Parenting Institute.
19. Jongudomkarn D, Promphakping B, Klungsaeng K. A comparative study on the quality of life and well-being results of the poor families and general families by using the Khon Kaen university quality of life and well-being (KKU QoL Well) indicator assessment for local government, 2009. Khon Kaen : Khon Kaen university.(in Thai)
20. Kumcha Y. The study on family well being : Case study of Ban Dong, Ubonret district, Khon Kaen province, 2008. Master of nursing science thesis in family nursing, graduated school, Khon Kaen university. (in Thai)
21. Noor N M, Gandhi A D, Ishak I, Wok S. Social Indicators Research : Development of Indicators for family wellbeing in Malaysia. Springer, 2014; 115(1): 279-318.
22. Inchaithep S. Development of warm family indicators for families in Lampang province. 2011. Graduate research presentation conference, Sukhothai Thammathirat open university. (in Thai)
23. Institute for population and social research, Mahidol university. The project of well-being of Thai rural families under demographic and social changes [database on the Internet] 2016. [cited 2016 November 30] Available From: https://knowledgefarm.in.th/ wpcontent /uploads/2016/09/well-being-rural-household.pdf.
24. Thianlai K, Hutaphaed w. Situation of migrant children in skipped-generation households in Thailand, 2015. Bangkok : Institute for population and social research, Mahidol university. (in Thai)
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Nursing Science and Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.