Clinical-target-volume to planning-target-volume margin evaluation in head-and-neck cancer VMAT using cone beam computed tomography

Authors

  • เมทินี วิเศษรินทอง ภาควิชารังสีวิทยา โรงพยาบาลจุฬาลงกรณ์

Abstract

Background and Objective: The interfraction setup variation may affect the precision of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to analyse the interfraction variation of head-and-neck cancer patients who were treated with VMAT technique by using cone beam CT (CBCT). The data was used to define adequate treatment CTV-to-PTV margin. Material and method: During June 2013 to June 2015, the CBCT data was collected from 109 headand- neck cancer patients treated with VMAT from Varian Clinac 23EX. The CBCT images were registered to the planning CT images and setup error on X, Y and Z direction were recorded Result: A total of 509 CBCT from 110 patients were collected. Systematic error in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were 0.89 mm, 0.98 mm and 1.01 mm, respectively, and the random error in vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions were 1.49 mm, 1.59 mm and 1.50 mm, respectively. Calculated CTV-to- PTV margins by using the Van Herk formula in vertical, longitudinal and lateral direction were 3.27 mm, 3.56 mm and 3.56 mm, respectively. Conclusion: The CTV-to-GTV margins were less than 5 mm, thus the margin ensured adequate coverage for all patients and can apply these margins for improving efficiency and reduction of side effects of radiotherapy.

References

Britton KR, Takai Y, Mitsuya M, Nemoto K, Ogawa Y, Yamada S. Evaluation of inter- and intrafraction organ motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer measured by a newly developed on-board image-guided system. Radiat Med. 2005;23:14-24.

Kron T. Reduction of margins in external beam radiotherapy. J Med Phys. 2008;33:41-2.

Volumetric modulated radiotherapy. http://wwwhopkinsmedicineorg/radiation oncology /treatments /external_beam_radiation /html.

Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. International Commissioning on Radiotherapy Units and Measurements. 1999;J icru(62):NP.

Eisbruch A CK, Garden A. Phase I/II study of conformal and intensity modulated irradiation for oropharyngeal cancer. RTOG. 2001;H-0022 [Web Page]:Available at http://rtog.org/members/ protocols/ h0022/h.pdf.

Naiyanet N, Oonsiri S, Lertbutsayanukul C, Suriyapee S. Measurements of patient's setup variation in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancer using electronic portal imaging device. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007;3:e30

Van Herk M, Remeijer P, Rasch C, Lebesque JV. The probability of correct target dosage: dose- opulation histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:1121-35.

Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loncol T, Renard L, Scalliet P, Gregoire V. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol. 2001 ;58:155-62.

Sweeney R, Bale R, Vogele M, Nevinny-Stickel M, Bluhm A, Auer T, et al. Repositioning accuracy: comparison of a noninvasive head holder with thermoplastic mask for fractionated radiotherapy and a case report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:475-83.

Zhu Y, Stovall J, Jr., Butler L, Ji Q, Gaber MW, Samant S, et al. Comparison of two immobilization techniques using portal film and digitally reconstructed radiographs for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;48:1233-40.

Ekberg L, Holmberg O, Wittgren L, Bjelkengren G, Landberg T. What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer? Radiother Oncol. 1998;48:71-7.

Ohara K, Okumura T, Akisada M, Inada T, Mori T, Yokota H, et al. Irradiation synchronized with respiration gate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.1989;17:853-7.

Shimizu S, Shirato H, Kagei K, Nishioka T, Bo X, Dosaka-Akita H, et al. Impact of respiratory movement on the computed tomographic images of small lung tumors in three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;46:1127-33.

Enmark M, Korreman S, Nystrom H. IGRT of prostate cancer; is the margin reduction gained from daily IG time-dependent? Acta Oncol. 2006;45:907-14.

Hawkins MA, Brock KK, Eccles C, Moseley D, Jaffray D, Dawson LA. Assessment of residual error in liver position using kV cone-beam computed tomography for liver cancer high-precision radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:610-9.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-13

How to Cite

1.
วิเศษรินทอง เ. Clinical-target-volume to planning-target-volume margin evaluation in head-and-neck cancer VMAT using cone beam computed tomography. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2019 Jul. 13 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];22(1):39-46. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/203080

Issue

Section

Original articles