Dosimetric analysis between Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Treatment: a systematic review

Authors

  • ภูริวัฒน์ เมืองวงศ์ กลุ่มงานรังสีรักษา โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งลำปาง
  • พิเชษฐ์ อุเบอร์ กลุ่มงานรังสีรักษา โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งชลบุรี
  • ดลสุข พงษ์นิกร กลุ่มภารกิจด้านการพัฒนาระบบสุขภาพ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งลำปาง
  • เจนวิทย์ เวียงนิล กลุ่มภารกิจด้านการพัฒนาระบบสุขภาพ โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งลำปาง
  • ณรงค์ ชุมภู กลุ่มงานรังสีรักษา โรงพยาบาลมะเร็งลำปาง

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy is one of the main treatments of esophageal cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an advanced type of radiotherapy and is rapidly used in many sites of cancer including esophageal cancer. Due to the benefit of IMRT which theoretically can reduce the dose to normal organ and increase dose to the target volume, this study will evaluate the benefit of fixed-gantry IMRT and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for treating esophageal cancer comparing to three-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (3DCRT). OBJECTIVES: To compare dosimetric data , cost effectiveness and quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer treated with IMRT technique comparing to 3DCRT. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE lists of articles during January 1990 to December 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials and Quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of Fixedgantry IMRT or VMAT versus 3DCRT on treating patients with esophageal cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the relevant trials and extracted the data from the included trials. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials contributed to this review. Fixed-gantry IMRT did not show either superior comformal index (CI) or heterogeneity index (HI) while VMAT had a statistically significant better CI but no different HI. As organ-at-risk comparison, fixed-gantry IMRT and VMATsignificantly decreased the volume of lung receiving at least 20 Gy (V20), mean lung dose (MLD), and VMAT significantly decreased spinal cord maximal dose. There was no study showed local control, distant metastasis, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival. There was also no study reported the cost effectiveness or quality of life. These trials did not report adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: These trials suggested that VMAT had a better CI. Fixed-gantry IMRT and VMAT statistically significant reduced the V20 to lung, MLD while VMAT also reduced spinal cord maximal dose. There was no such evidence of any important clinical effects on acute or late radiotherapy adverse events, local control, distant metastasis, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival. There was also no evidence of the effect on the cost effectiveness or quality of life. Further research is required to establish the clinical benefit of any therapy. An economic evaluation should be undertaken.

References

Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D MC and PD. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet] [Internet]. Int. Agency Res. Cancer2010;Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr

Berry MF. Esophageal cancer: staging system and guidelines for staging and treatment. J Thorac Dis 2014;6 Suppl 3:S289-97.

Chang DT, Chapman C, Shen J, Su Z, Koong AC. Treatment of esophageal cancer based on histology: a surveillance epidemiology and end results analysis. Am J Clin Oncol 2009;32:405–10.

Malthaner R a, Collin S, Fenlon D. Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD001556.

Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ. Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers Version 2.2015. 2014.

Report 83: Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT). J ICRU 2010;10.

Lin X, Shi X, Zhou T, Zhang W. [Intensity-modulated or 3-D conformal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma]. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 2011;31:1264–7.

Kumar G, Rawat S, Puri A, Sharma MK, Chadha P, Babu AG, et al. Analysis of dose-volume parameters predicting radiation pneumonitis in patients with esophageal cancer treated with 3D-conformal radiation therapy or IMRT. Jpn J Radiol 2012;30:18–24.

Fakhrian K, Oechsner M, Kampfer S, Schuster T, Molls M, Geinitz H. Advanced techniques in neoadjuvant radiotherapy allow dose escalation without increased dose to the organs at risk: Planning study in esophageal carcinoma. Strahlentherapie und Onkol 2013;189:293–300.

Fenkell L, Kaminsky I, Breen S, Huang S, Van Prooijen M, Ringash J. Dosimetric comparison of IMRT vs. 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the cervical esophagus. Radiother Oncol 2008;89:287–91.

Fu W-H, Wang L-H, Zhou Z-M, Dai J-R, Hu Y-M, Zhao L-J. Comparison of conformal and intensitymodulated techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of upper esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:1098–102.

Nicolini G, Ghosh-Laskar S, Shrivastava SK, Banerjee S, Chaudhary S, Agarwal JP, et al. Volumetric Modulation Arc Radiotherapy With Flattening Filter-Free Beams Compared With Static Gantry IMRT and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Feasibility Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:553–60.

Nutting CM, Bedford JL, Cosgrove VP, Tait DM, Dearnaley DP, Webb S. A comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for oesophageal radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2001;61:157–63.

Vivekanandan N, Sriram P, Kumar S a S, Bhuvaneswari N, Saranya K, Syam Kumar SA, et al. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Med Dosim 2011;37:108–13.

Freilich J, Hoffe SE, Almhanna K, Dinwoodie W, Yue B, Fulp W, et al. Comparative outcomes for threedimensional conformal versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2014;28:1–6.

Kwa SL, Lebesque J V, Theuws JC, Marks LB, Munley MT, Bentel G, et al. Radiation pneumonitis as a function of mean lung dose: an analysis of pooled data of 540 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;42:1–9.

Seppenwoolde Y, Lebesque J V, de Jaeger K, Belderbos JSA, Boersma LJ, Schilstra C, et al. Comparing different NTCP models that predict the incidence of radiation pneumonitis. Normal tissue complication probability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55:724–35.

Kirkpatrick JP, van der Kogel AJ, Schultheiss TE. Radiation Dose–Volume Effects in the Spinal Cord. Int J Radiat Oncol 2010;76:S42–9.

Gagliardi G, Constine LS, Moiseenko V, Correa C, Pierce LJ, Allen AM, et al. Radiation Dose–Volume Effects in the Heart. Int J Radiat Oncol 2010;76:S77–85.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-28

How to Cite

1.
เมืองวงศ์ ภ, อุเบอร์ พ, พงษ์นิกร ด, เวียงนิล เ, ชุมภู ณ. Dosimetric analysis between Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Treatment: a systematic review. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 28 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];23(2):37-49. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/203055

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 2 (2017): July – December

Section

Original articles

License

บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารมะเร็งวิวัฒน์ สมาคมรังสีรักษาและมะเร็งวิทยาแห่งประเทศไทย

ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับสมาคมรังสีรักษาและมะเร็งวิทยาแห่งประเทศไทย และบุคคลากรท่านอื่น ๆ ใน สมาคมฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว