Dosimetric Comparison of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Planning between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy in Vestibular Schwannoma

Authors

  • จิตรลดา จิตรมั่น ภาควิชารังสีวิทยา คณะแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
  • อิ่มใจ ชิตาพนารักษ์ ภาควิชารังสีวิทยา คณะแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่
  • สมศักดิ์ วรรณวิไลรัตน์ ภาควิชารังสีวิทยา คณะแพทยศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่

Keywords:

Dosimetric Comparison, SRT, VMAT, Helical Tomotherapy, Vestibular Schwannoma

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an alternative treatment for Vestibular Schwannoma. The advancement of linear accelerator technology and the development of intensity modulated radiotherapy such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Helical tomotherapy (HT) techniques that can achieve a high accuracy, a high level of conformity and steep dose gradients to the treatment target and reduce radiation dose to the normal organs. These techniques are an option for Vestibular Schwannoma treatment. Objectives: To compare the dosimetric results of VMAT and HT treatment planning for Vestibular Schwannoma. Materials/Methods: This is a retrospective study of sixteen Vestibular Schwannoma patients who received SRT with Helical tomotherapy. The CT images data with patient's treatment target and normal organs structures were used to create the VMAT plans with total radiation doses of 50–54 Gy (1.8-2Gy/F). Treatment target and organs at risk were constraint follow ICRU 83 report and Quantec guideline respectively. Treatment plan quality evaluation parameters included conformation number (CN), conformality gradient index (CGIg) and homogeneity index (HI). Radiation dose of organs at risk were evaluated by D2, Dmax and Dmean Results: The CN, CGIg and HI between HT and VMAT plans were no statistically significant different (p-value < 0.05). The organs at risk doses of VMAT plan were statistically significant lower than HT plan (p-value < 0.05). These doses of VMAT and HT plans were as follows D2 (Gy) of the brainstem was 44.326±10.528 and 46.339±8.181, D2 (Gy) of optic chiasm was 4.495±3.508 and 8.304±5.829, Dmax (Gy) of optic chiasm was 5.109±4.026 and 8.819±6.085, D2 (Gy) of ipsi-lateral optic nerve was 3.372±1.623 and 7.487±3.770, Dmax (Gy) of ipsi-lateral optic nerve was 3.665±1.837 and 8.174±3.933, D2 (Gy) of contra-lateral optic nerve was 2.147±1.041 and 4.832±2.514, Dmax (Gy) of contra-lateral optic nerve was 2.361±1.154 and 5.122±2.610, Dmean (Gy) of ipsi-lateral globe was 1.781±0.513 and 3.482±1.865, D2 (Gy) of ipsi-lateral globe was 2.778±0.765 and 6.314±1.881, Dmean (Gy) of contra-lateral globe was 1.057±0.551 and 2.749±1.484, D2 (Gy) of contralateral globe was 2.321±0.765 and 5.080±1.483 respectively. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant difference of CN, CGIg and HI between VMAT and HT plans for Vestibular Schwannoma SRT. But VMAT plans provided organs at risk dose statistically significant less than HT plans.

References

Palma DA, Verbakel WFAR, Otto K, Senan S. New developments in arc radiation therapy: A review. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2010;36:393-9.

Report 83. Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. 2010;10:NP-NP.

Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Constine LS, Eisbruch A, et al. Use of Normal Tissue Complication Probability Models in the Clinic. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2010;76:S10-S9.

Riet Avt, Mak ACA, Moerland MA, Elders LH, van der Zee W. A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: Application to the prostate. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 1997;37:731-6.

Wagner TH, Bova FJ, Friedman WA, Buatti JM, Bouchet LG, Meeks SL. A simple and reliable index for scoring rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2003;57:1141-9.

Wu Q, Mohan R, Morris M, Lauve A, Schmidt-Ullrich R. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. I: dosimetric results. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2003;56:573-85.

Mayo CS, Ding L, Addesa A, Kadish S, Fitzgerald TJ, Moser R. Initial Experience With Volumetric IMRT (RapidArc) for Intracranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2010;78:1457-66.

Ruschin M, Lightstone A, Karotki A, Cadonic M, Nico A, Davidson M, et al. Development of vmat program for the treatment of brain metastases and cavities. Journal of Radiosurgery & SBRT. 2013;2.

Fogliata A, Clivio A, Nicolini G, Vanetti E, Cozzi L. Intensity modulation with photons for benign intracranial tumours: A planning comparison of volumetric single arc, helical arc and fixed gantry techniques. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2009;89:254-62.

Cao D, Holmes TW, Afghan MKN, Shepard DM. Comparison of Plan Quality Provided by Intensity-Modulated Arc Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 2007;69:240-50.

Gladwish A, Kron T, McNiven A, Bauman G, Van Dyk J. Asymmetric fan beams (AFB) for improvement of the craniocaudal dose distribution in helical tomotherapy delivery. Medical Physics. 2004;31:2443-8.

Smyth G, Evans PM, Bamber JC, Mandeville HC, Welsh LC, Saran FH, et al. Non-coplanar trajectories to improve organ at risk sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy for primary brain tumors. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2016;121:124-31.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

How to Cite

1.
จิตรมั่น จ, ชิตาพนารักษ์ อ, วรรณวิไลรัตน์ ส. Dosimetric Comparison of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Planning between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy in Vestibular Schwannoma. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2018 Jun. 28 [cited 2024 May 4];24(1):96-102. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/203051

Issue

Section

Original articles