The patient setting up comparison between using two immobilization devices for lung cancer patient

Authors

  • วรญา เงินเถื่อน สาขารังสีรักษาและมะเร็งวิทยา โรงพยาบาลจุฬาลงกรณ์ สภากาชาดไทย

Keywords:

Lung cancer, Cone beam computed tomography, Immobilization, Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Abstract

Background Lung cancer radiotherapy requires high accuracy of radiation dose to the target volume. Thus, setup reproducibility in the lung area is particularly important because there are surrounding critical organs such as heart and healthy lung tissue. Currently, there are 2 types of the immobilizations including; long mask (covered chest region) and wing board used to reduce patient setup error in our radiotherapy center. This study would like to evaluate the accuracy of the used of long mask and wing board for patient setup error. Objectives The objectives of this study were to compare the patient setup error between using extended long mask and wing board setting up and to monitor the patient pain level in different areas when long mask and wing board were used. Materials and methods The 30 cases of lung cancer patients treated with TrueBEAM linear accelerator using VMAT technique were collected. The patients were divided into 2 groups that used extended long mask group and wing board group. The weekly CBCT images were taken to evaluate the patient setup error. For the patient pain level in different areas of using immobilization, the 5 score level (from 1 to 5) in 4 areas including forehead, shoulder, neck, and back were selected to evaluate the results. Results The total of 180 CBCT images was analyzed. The average results of patient setup errors from long mask group and wing board group was -0.04±0.37, -0.06±0.40, -0.05±0.33 cm. and 0.08±0.48, 0.14±0.52, 0.11±0.45 cm. for vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions, respectively. The patient setup errors using long mask were significantly lesser than wing board for all directions supported by p-values, with the reduction in patient pain at shoulder region. However, the patient pain at forehead region increased when the mask was used. Conclusion The weekly CBCT can be performed to verify the patient position error. Using the extended long mask immobilization can reduce in patient setup error for all directions with lesser pain at shoulder level for lung cancer patient treatment.

References

นพ.วีรวุฒิ อิ่มสำราญ, นพ.อาคม ชัยวีระวัฒนะ, นพ.สมชาย ธนะสิทธิชัย, นพ.ปิยวัฒน์ เลาวหุตานนท์, ดร.ศุลีพร แสงกระจ่าง. โรคมะเร็ง. การแพทย์ไทย. 2554-2557;4-5.

มะเร็งวิทยาสมาคมแห่งประเทศไทย. ทำความรู้จักกับโรคมะเร็งกันเถอะ. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1 กทม. 2552;14-5.

Bentel GC, Marks LB, Krishnamurthy R. Impact of cradle immobilization on setup reproducibility during external beam radiation therapy for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:527-31.

Sutee D, Ruj S, Apinya K. Set up verification and PTV margins determination of rapid arc therapy in prostate cancer using an on-board imager. Siriraj Med. J. 2015; 67(suppl 1):S1-5.

Naiyanet N, Oonsiri S, Lertbutsayanukul C, Suriyapee S. Measurements of patient’s setup variation in intensity-modulated radiation therapy of head and neck cancer using electronic portal imaging device. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2007;62.

นีรนุช ทวีบุญ, คชา ตินทุการนนท์, สุที เดชะวงศ์สุวรรณ. การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบความคลาดเคลื่อนของตำแหน่ง isocenter ระหว่างแนวเหนือและต่อ nipple สำหรับการฉายรังสีมะเร็งบริเวณทรวงอกและช่องท้องโดยการใช้ภาพ kV Orthogonal หรือ CBCT images at Siriraj Hospital. วารสารมะเร็งวิวัฒน์ 2018; 24:25-34.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-27

How to Cite

1.
เงินเถื่อน ว. The patient setting up comparison between using two immobilization devices for lung cancer patient. J Thai Assn of Radiat Oncol [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 27 [cited 2024 May 2];24(2):29-37. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jtaro/article/view/203026

Issue

Section

Original articles