Comparison of the safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in Thai patients: A single-center retrospective study

Authors

  • Warunsorn Krintratun Department of Medicine, Nakornping Hospital
  • Wannaphorn Rotchanapanya Department of Medicine, Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital
  • Natnicha Pongbangli Department of Medicine, Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital

Keywords:

direct oral anticoagulants, bleeding, dabigatran, rivaroxaban

Abstract

Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran and rivaroxaban, are commonly used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment. However, real-world data on their comparative safety profiles in Thai population is limited.

Objective: The primary objective was to compare the safety outcomes of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in Thai population in real-world use.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital. The study included patients age over 18 years, diagnosed with AF or VTE, and received either dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Data were collected via electronic medical records from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2023. Baseline characteristics, bleeding events, and thrombotic outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Total 249 patients were included. The study population’s mean age was 70.5 ± 10.2 years, with 51% being male. The median follow-up time was 17.5 months
(IQR, 11 - 31 months) for both groups. Dabigatran was prescribed more frequently to patients with a history of stroke compared to rivaroxaban (55.0% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001). Conversely, rivaroxaban was prescribed more often to patients with heart failure (23.1% vs. 13.1%, p = 0.025). The dabigatran group had a higher HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared to the rivaroxaban group (1.9 vs. 1.5, p < 0.001, and 3.8 vs 3.2, p = 0.001), respectively. The incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding was 3.34 and 3.86 per 100 person-years for rivaroxaban and dabigatran, respectively (HR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.44 - 3.04, p = 0.774). No intracranial bleeding was observed in either group.

Conclusion: This study found no significant difference in the risk of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding between dabigatran and rivaroxaban in Thai population. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to guide clinical decision-making.

References

Kornej J, Börschel CS, Benjamin EJ, Schnabel RB. Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation in the 21st Century: Novel Methods and New Insights. Circ Res. 2020;127(1):4-20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316340.

Joglar JA, Chung MK, Armbruster AL, Benjamin EJ, Chyou JY, Cronin EM, et al. 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2024;149(1):e1-e156. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001193.

Ortel TL, Neumann I, Ageno W, Beyth R, Clark NP, Cuker A, et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood Adv. 2020;4(19):4693-738. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001830.

Yamashita Y, Morimoto T, Toyota T, Shiomi H, Makiyama T, Ono K, et al. Asian patients versus non-Asian patients in the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants relative to vitamin K antagonist for venous thromboembolism: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2018;166:37-42. doi: 10.1016/ j.thromres.2018.04.008.

Sabir I, Khavandi K, Brownrigg J, Camm AJ. Oral anticoagulants for Asian patients with atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(5):290-303. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.22.

Lau WCY, Torre CO, Man KKC, Stewart HM, Seager S, Van Zandt M, et al. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Between Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation : A Multinational Population-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2022 ;175(11):1515-24. doi: 10.7326/M22-0511.

Menichelli D, Del Sole F, Di Rocco A, Farcomeni A, Vestri A, Violi F, et al. Real-world safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 605 771 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021;7(FI1):f11-9. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab002.

Rutherford OW, Jonasson C, Ghanima W, Söderdahl F, Halvorsen S. Comparison of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for effectiveness and safety in atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020;6(2):75-85. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz086.

Lee SR, Choi EK, Kwon S, Han KD, Jung JH, Cha MJ, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Contemporary Oral Anticoagulants Among Asians With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. Stroke. 2019;50(8):2245-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025536.

Tsai ML, Lee CH, Hsieh MJ, Chen SW, Chang SH, Tseng CN, et al. A Comparison among Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Multi-Institutional Study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(23):7159. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237159.

Srikajornlarp S, Amnueypol M, Vathesatogkit P, Numthavaj P, Ungkanont A, Likittanasombat K, et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Thai Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022;28:10760296221130058. doi: 10.1177/10760296221130058.

Schulman S, Kearon C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3(4):692-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x.

Steffel J, Collins R, Antz M, Cornu P, Desteghe L, Haeusler KG, et al. 2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Europace. 2021;23(10):1612-76. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab065.

Chan YH, See LC, Tu HT, Yeh YH, Chang SH, Wu LS, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Asians With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(8):e008150. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008150.

Huang YL, Chen CY, Chu CC. Risk of major bleeding and thromboembolism in Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin. Int J Clin Pharm. 2022;44(1):34-43. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01309-z.

Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Nielsen PB, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GY. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2016;353:i3189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3189.

Noseworthy PA, Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR, McBane RD, Shah ND. Direct Comparison of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban for Effectiveness and Safety in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. Chest. 2016;150(6):1302-12. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.013.

Downloads

Published

09-03-2026

How to Cite

Krintratun, W., Rotchanapanya, W., & Pongbangli, N. (2026). Comparison of the safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in Thai patients: A single-center retrospective study. Journal of Nakornping Hospital, 17(2), 134–146. retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jnkp/article/view/281325

Issue

Section

Research article