Factors affecting the deterioration of ball attachment system on dental implants in patients with implant-retained mandibular overdentures “Khao Aroi,” Kamphaeng Phet hospital
Keywords:
deterioration of ball attachment system, implant-retained mandibular overdenture “Khao Aroi”Abstract
Objective: To identify factors affecting the deterioration of ball attachment system on dental implants in patients with implant-retained mandibular overdentures “Khao Aroi” in Kamphaeng Phet hospital.
Method of the study: This study was a retrospective study in 67 patients who were implanted with implant-retained mandibular overdentures “Khao Aroi” in Kamphaeng Phet hospital from 15 October 2012 to 30 July 2016, by collecting information about gender, age, systemic disease, implant location from midline of lower arch, parallel and height of two ball attachments, chewing area and long-term follow-up. The correlation was analyzed by using Fisher’s exact test.
Results: There was statistically significant correlation between the height of two ball attachments and the chewing area with the deterioration of ball attachment system on dental implants (p<0.05). It revealed that patients with uneven height of two ball attachments and patients with improper chewing area encountered the deterioration of ball attachment system. The position of two implants from midline of lower arch and the chewing area were found to be significantly correlated with the condition of peri-implant tissue (p<0.05). Patients with unequal gap between each implant and patients with improper chewing area had peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis. However, there was no correlation between gender, age and systemic disease with the deterioration of ball attachment system or peri-implant tissue.
Conclusion: The height of two ball attachments was a factor affecting the deterioration of ball attachment system on dental implants. The position of two implants from midline of lower arch also affected the peri-implant tissue. Moreover, the chewing area also influenced the deterioration of ball attachment system on dental implants and the peri-implant tissue.
References
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2002;19(1):3-4.
Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(5):468-73. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.119921.
Keshk AM, Alqutaibi AY, Algabri RS, Swedan MS, Kaddah A. Prosthodontic maintenance and peri-implant tissue conditions for telescopic attachment-retained mandibular implant overdenture: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(4):559-68. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_23_17.
Siadat H, Alikhasi M, Mirfazaelian A, Geramipanah F, Zaery F. Patient satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10(2):93-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00065.x.
Elsyad MA. Patient satisfaction and prosthetic aspects with mini-implants retained mandibular overdentures. A 5-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(7):926-33. doi: 10.1111/clr.12660.
Daubert DM, Weinstein BF, Bordin S, Leroux BG, Flemming TF. Prevalence and predictive factors for peri-implant disease and implant failure: a cross-sectional analysis. J Periodontol. 2015;86(3):337-47. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140438.
Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(3):195-203.
Çötert İ, Çötert HS. Clinical Appearances of Dental Implant Overload and Precautions. Madridge J Dent Oral Surg. 2017;2(2):70-5. doi: 10.18689/mjdl-1000117.
Winkler S, Piermatti J, Rothman A, Siamos G. An overview of the O-ring implant overdenture attachment: clinical reports. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(2):82-6. doi: 10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0082:AOOTOI>2.3.CO;2.
Fromentin O, Lassauzay C, Nader SA, Feine J, de Albuquerque RF Jr. Wear of matrix overdenture attachments after one to eight years of clinical use. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(3):191-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60055-9.
Academic Development Subcommittee. Handbook for implant-retained mandibular overdentures “Khao Aroi” in the Dental Implant Project in honor of His Majesty the King on the auspicious occasion of His Majesty the King's 7th Cycle Birthday Anniversary 5 December 2011. Nonthaburi: Institute of Dentistry, Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health; 2013. (In Thai)
Dental Department Kamphaeng Phet Hospital. Group Situation report of patient's satisfaction with implant-retained mandibular overdentures during the year 2014-2022. Kamphaeng Phet: Dental Department Kamphaeng Phet Hospital; 2022. (In Thai)
Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: Case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S304-12. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0588.
Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Peri-implant health. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S249-56. doi: 10.1002/JPER.16-0424.
Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(Suppl 8):286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01274.x.
Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular two-implant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(5):e69-76.
Daou EE. Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(4):255-62. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.161752
Walton JN, Huizinga SC, Peck CC. Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(6):523-30.
Rodrigues RC, Faria AC, Macedo AP, Sartori IA, de Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(12):1314-9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01742.x
Wiemeyer AS, Agar JR, Kazemi RB. Orientation of retentive matrices on spherical attachments independent of implant parallelism. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(4):434-7. doi:10.1067/mpr.2001.118365
Michelinakis G, Barclay CW, Smith PW. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19(5):507-12.
Doukas D, Michelinakis G, Smith PW, Barclay CW. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(2):152-4.
Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33(12):929-35. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01001.x
Dubey RK, Gupta DK, Singh AK. Dental implant survival in diabetic patients; review and recommendations. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013;4(2):142-50. doi:10.4103/0975-5950.127642
Olson JW, Shernoff AF, Tarlow JL, Colwell JA, Scheetz JP, Bingham SF. Dental endosseous implant assessments in a type 2 diabetic population: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(6):811-18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nakornping Hospital
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The articles that had been published in the journal is copyright of Journal of Nakornping hospital, Chiang Mai.
Contents and comments in the articles in Journal of Nakornping hospital are at owner’s responsibilities that editor team may not totally agree with.
