Methods of measuring location of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) insertion and prediction of lag screw migration in trochanteric fracture of the hip after PFNA fixation

Authors

  • Piya Tosukhowong Sansai Hospital, Chiang Mai

Keywords:

PFNA, Hip fracture, Failure of Fixation

Abstract

         Hip fracture is an increasingly common problem, especially in the elderly. The most popular type of surgery today is proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). However, there were also frequent complications such as screw migration, screw cut-out and non-union. The objective of this study was to study the ability to predict lag screw migration of the method for measuring the position of PFNA insertion with TAD, Cal-TAD, Parker AP, Parker Lat and TFD.

          Quantitative research retrospective cohort study from the electronic X-ray database of Sansai Hospital. In all patients with trochanteric region hip fracture over 60 years of age who received surgical PFNA treatment from June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020, X-ray images were assessed after surgery on the day of surgery or after 1 day of surgery and during 3 to 6 months. TAD, Cal-TAD, Parker AP, Parker Lat, TFD and Tip of lag screw were measured.

          From 83 patients included to this study, 59 patients were able to measure the values ​​completely, 61% were female, 63% right hip fracture, most of them were aged 80-90 years (28 patients, 40.7%). The mean of screw migration was 12.23 (SD 7.78) mm. The results showed that TAD, Cal-TAD and TFD were associated with screw migration, coefficience = 1.2319, 1.4799 and 1.2720 respectively (p < 0.001). Parker AP and Parker Lat found no correlation for Coef. 0.0009 and -0.8365 (p > 0.05).

         Measuring the position of PFNA insertion by TAD, Cal-TAD and TFD was able to predict lag screw migration significantly. Minimal value Predict the least lag screw migration or position the tip of lag screw as close to the center of fovea capitis as possible.

References

กรมกิจการผู้สูงอายุ. สถิติผู้สูงอายุของประเทศไทย 77 ณ.วันที่ 31 ธันวาคม 2562 [อินเทอร์เน็ต]. กรุงเทพฯ: กรมกิจการผู้สูงอายุ; c2562 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 6 สิงหาคม 2563]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: http://www.dop.go.th/th/know/side/1/1/275.

Mittal R, Banerjee S. Proximal femoral fractures: Principles of management and review of literature. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2012;3(1):15-23.

Wongtriratanachai P, Luevitoonvechkij S, Songpatanasilp T, Sribunditkul S, Leerapun T, Phadungkiat S, et al. Increasing incidence of hip fracture in Chiang Mai, Thailand. J Clin Densitom. 2013;16(3):347-52.

Jain R, Koo M, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Comparison of early and delayed fixation of subcapital hip fractures in patients sixty years of age or less. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(9):1605-12.

Upadhyay A, Jain P, Mishra P, Maini L, Gautum VK, Dhaon BK. Delayed internal fixation of fractures of the neck of the femur in young adults. A prospective, randomised study comparing closed and open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(7):1035-40.

Uzoigwe CE, Burnand HG, Cheesman CL, Aghedo DO, Faizi M, Middleton RG. Early and ultra-early surgery in hip fracture patients improves survival. Injury. 2013;44(6):726-9.

Butler A, Hahessy S, Condon F. The effect of time to surgery on functional ability at six weeks in a hip fracture population in Mid-West Ireland. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs. 2017;26:36-42.

Shiga T, Wajima Z, Ohe Y. Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can J Anaesth. 2008;55(3):146-54.

Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, Guyatt GH, Schemitsch E, Debeer J, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2010;182(15):1609-16.

Al-Ani AN, Samuelsson B, Tidermark J, Norling A, Ekström W, Cederholm T, et al. Early operation on patients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to independent living. A prospective study of 850 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(7):1436-42.

Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M, Taylor AM. Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important?. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):483-9.

Klestil T, Röder C, Stotter C, Winkler B, Nehrer S, Lutz M, et al. Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13933.

Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Speitling A, Taglang G, Ekholm C, Jönsson A. 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:133.

Lang NW, Breuer R, Beiglboeck H, Munteanu A, Hajdu S, Windhager R, et al. Migration of the Lag Screw after Intramedullary Treatment of AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 Pertrochanteric Fractures Does Not Result in Higher Incidence of Cut-Outs, Regardless of Which Implant Was Used: A Comparison of Gamma Nail with and without U-Blade (RC) Lag Screw and Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation (PFNA). J Clin Med. 2019;8(5):615.

Hesse B, Gächter A. Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(10):692-8.

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(7):1058-64.

Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010;41(12):1312-6.

Kuzyk PR, Zdero R, Shah S, Olsen M, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):414-21.

Parker MJ. Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74(4):625.

ทิพภวัน ทิพสายทอง. การหาระยะทางระหว่างจุดสองจุดในปริภูมิสามมิติ [อินเทอร์เน็ต]. c2556 [เข้าถึงเมื่อ 6 สิงหาคม 2563]. เข้าถึงได้จาก: https://www.gotoknow.org/posts/226992.

Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32 Suppl 1:S1-S170.

Lee CH, Su KC, Chen KH, Pan CC, Wu YC. Impact of tip-apex distance and femoral head lag screw position on treatment outcomes of unstable intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nails. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(6):2128-40.

Andruszkow H, Frink M, Frömke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, Mommsen P, Suntardjo S, et al. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36(11):2347-54.

Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk PR. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(8):1029-34.

Raghuraman R, Kam JW, Chua DTC. Predictors of failure following fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation. Singapore Med J. 2019;60(9):463-67.

Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jönsson A. Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma Nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1.

Downloads

Published

13-05-2021

How to Cite

Tosukhowong, P. (2021). Methods of measuring location of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) insertion and prediction of lag screw migration in trochanteric fracture of the hip after PFNA fixation. Journal of Nakornping Hospital, 12(1), 25–42. Retrieved from https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jnkp/article/view/247431

Issue

Section

Research article