A Comparison of the Cost and Consumption of Sevoflurane and Litholyme at Total Gas Flow Rates of 1 and 2 Liters Per Minute: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors

  • Chanatthee Kitsiripant Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Piachompoo Boonmuang Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Sunisa Chatmongkolchart Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Jutarat Tanasansuttiporn Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Natnicha Liochaichan Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.
  • Nuttipa Jantawong Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2022895

Keywords:

cost, litholyme, low-flow anesthesia, sevoflurane

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of low-flow (1 liter per minute (LPM)) and medium-flow (2 LPM) anesthesia.
Material and Methods: Seventy patients aged 18–60 years who were undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to receive a total gas flow rate of 1 LPM (group 1) and 2 LPM (group 2) during the maintenance of anesthesia. The primary outcome was to compare the cost and consumption of sevoflurane and litholyme. The secondary outcomes were hemodynamic stability and time to extubation.
Results: The cost and consumption of sevoflurane in group 1 (197.3 Thai Bahts (THB)/hour (hr) and 9.6 milliliter (ml)/ hr) were significantly less than those in group 2 (303.2 THB/hr and 14.8 ml/hr; p-value<0.001). Although there was no difference in the cost and consumption of litholyme between the two groups, the summary cost of sevoflurane and litholyme in group 1 (237.7 THB/hr) was significantly less than that in group 2 (339.6 THB/hr; p-value<0.001). The mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and time to extubation were not significantly different in both groups.
Conclusion: Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with a total flow of 1 LPM can save on the cost of sevoflurane and litholyme, which is equivalent to 101.9 THB/hr.

References

Baum JA. Low-flow anesthesia: theory, practice, technical preconditions, advantages, and foreign gas accumulation. J Anesth 1999;13:166-74.

Upadya M, Saneesh PJ. Low-flow anaesthesia-underused mode towards “sustainable anaesthesia”. Indian J Anaesth 2018;62:166-72.

Nunn G. Low-flow anesthesia. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2008;8:1-4.

Naco M, Ohri I, Gani H, Mandi A, Petrela E. Comparison of cost effectiveness using low flow anesthesia with an oxygen/nitrous oxide carrier gas sevoflurane versus using high flow anesthesia with an oxygen/nitrous oxide carrier gas sevoflurane during 2 hours anesthesia in abdominal surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:19-20.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [homepage on Internet]. Maryland. ULTANE® (sevoflurane) volatile liquid for inhalation description. [cited 2022 April 27] Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/ label/2017/020478s030lbl.pdf.

Allied Hospital Systems. [homepage on Internet]. Maryland. Litholyme® description. [cited 2022 April 27] Available from: http://www.alliedmedgas.org/Brochures/A/Allied_Healthcare/ LithoLyme-2.pdf.

Atchison FW, Gujer MW. Cost and efficiency Analysis of Low Flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia Using Dragersorb Free Absorber. In: Poster session presented at: Society for Technology in Anesthesia 2015 Annual Meeting; 2015 January 7-10; Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Shelgaonkar V, Choudhary A. Low flow anaesthesia: economic, eco friendly and effective. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2017;4:382-7.

Feldman JM, Lo C, Hendrickx J. Estimating the impact of carbon dioxide absorbent performance differences on absorbent cost during low-flow anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2020;130:374-81.

Kepekçi AB, Omaygenç DÖ, Karaca İO, Telli S, Yücepur S, Özenç E. Even lower is possıble: Impact of flow rate on safety issues in low flow anaesthesia. Bakirkoy Tip Derg Med J Bakirkoy 2019;15:15-23.

Misal US, Joshi SA, Shaikh MM. Delayed recovery from anesthesia: a postgraduate educational review. Anesth Essays Res 2016;10:164-72.

Jeong JS, Yoon SW, Choi SL, Choi SH, Lee BY, Jeong MA. Comparison of emergence times with different fresh gas flow rates following desflurane anaesthesia. J Int Med Res 2014;42:1285-93.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-19

How to Cite

1.
Kitsiripant C, Boonmuang P, Chatmongkolchart S, Tanasansuttiporn J, Liochaichan N, Jantawong N. A Comparison of the Cost and Consumption of Sevoflurane and Litholyme at Total Gas Flow Rates of 1 and 2 Liters Per Minute: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Health Sci Med Res [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 19 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];41(1):1-8. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/263076

Issue

Section

Original Article