Intraoperative Hemodynamic Fluid Therapy for Immediate- to High-risk Non-cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2022879Keywords:
fluid responsiveness, fluid therapy, hemodynamic monitoring, non-cardiac surgeryAbstract
The rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality during major surgery have shown a declining trend due to improvements in hemodynamic monitoring and fluid assessment. However, several million surgical procedures involving aged patients and those with multiple comorbidities are performed every year worldwide. Thus, the establishment and constant re-evaluation of appropriate threshold values of perioperative hemodynamic parameters for the management of immediate- to high-risk patients with a narrow safety margin are especially important. Perioperative fluid balance is an important independent risk factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. In this article, we provide an overview of intraoperative hemodynamic fluid resuscitation and fluid-response monitoring during non-cardiac surgery. We also focus on targets at the macrocirculatory, microcirculatory, and cellular levels.
References
Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1368–75.
Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C, et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7-day cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:1059–65.
Kahan BC, Koulenti D, Arvaniti K, Beavis V, Campbell D, Chan M, et al. Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:971–9.
Saugel B, Vincent JL, Wagner JY. Personalized hemodynamic management. Curr Opin Crit Care 2017;23:334–41.
Yamada T, Vacas S, Gricourt Y, Cannesson M. Improving perioperative outcomes through minimally invasive and non invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018;5:144.
Shaw M, Chishti A. Advanced cardiovascular monitoring. Surg Oxf 2016;34:97–104.
Montgomery H, Astin R. Normal physiologic of the cardiovascular system. In: Webb A, Angus D, Finfer S, Gattinoni L, Singer M, editors. Oxford textbook of critical care. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016;p.595–7.
Chong MA, Wang Y, Berbenetz NM, McConachie I. Does goal-directed haemodynamic and fluid therapy improve peri operative outcomes?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2018;35:469–83.
Nicklas JY, Diener O, Leistenschneider M, Sellhorn C, Schön G, Winkler M, et al. Personalised haemodynamic management targeting baseline cardiac index in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a randomised single-centre clinical trial. Br J Anaesth 2020;125:122–32.
Hajjar LA, Almeida JP, Fukushima JT, Rhodes A, Vincent JL, Osawa EA, et al. High lactate levels are predictors of major complications after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:455–60.
Silva Junior JM, Oliveira AMRR, Silveira BR, Ferreira UP, Albretht RN, Gonzaga TB, et al. Intraoperative lactate measurements are not predictive of death in high risk surgical patients. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2010;22:229–35.
Gulmez S, Uzun O, Senger AS, Keklikkiran ZZ, Bozkurt H, Omeroglu S, et al. Risk factors for persistent elevation of perioperative lactate levels in gastric cancer surgery. Asian J Med Sci 2020;11:24–8.
Kuhn C, Werdan K. Hemodynamic monitoring [monograph on the Internet]. Surgical treatment: evidence-based and problem oriented. Zuckschwerdt; 2001 [cited 2021 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK6895/
de Backer D, Cholley BP, Slama M, Vieillard-Baron A, Vignon P, editors. Hemodynamic monitoring using echocardiography in the critically ill [monograph on the Internet]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2011 [cited 2021 Apr 15]. Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540879565.
Guerin L, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Monitoring volume and fluid responsiveness: from static to dynamic indicators. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2013;27:177–85.
Sander M, Schneck E, Habicher M. Management of perioperative volume therapy – monitoring and pitfalls. Korean J Anesthesiol 2020;73:103–13.
Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008;134:172–8.
Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care 2011;1:1-9.
Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007;35:64–8.
Guyton AC. Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiol Rev 1955;35:123–9.
Magder S. Fluid status and fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2010;16:289–96.
Bayliss WM, Starling EH. Observations on venous pressures and their relationship to capillary pressures. J Physiol 1894; 16:159–318.
Guyton AC, Lindsey AW, Kaufmann BN, Abernathy JB. Effect of blood transfusion and hemorrhage on cardiac output and on the venous return curve. Am J Physiol 1958;194:263–7.
Cecconi M, Aya HD, Geisen M, Ebm C, Fletcher N, Grounds RM, et al. Changes in the mean systemic filling pressure during a fluid challenge in postsurgical intensive care patients. Intensive Car Med 2013;39:1299-305.
De Backer D, Vincent JL. Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions. Crit Care 2018;22:43.
Eskesen TG, Wetterslev M, Perner A. Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 2016;42:324–32.
Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, Conte B, Mahjoub Y, Desebbe O, et al. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care 2014;18:587.
Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCO plus system. Crit Care 2008;12:R82.
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2642–7.
Michard F, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey? Crit Care 2015;19:144-6
Mathis MR, Schechtman SA, Engoren MC, Shanks AM, Thompson A, Kheterpal S, et al. Arterial pressure variation in elective noncardiac surgery: identifying reference distributions and modifying factors. Anesthesiology 2017;126:249–59.
Teboul JL, Monnet X, Chemla D, Michard F. Arterial pulse pressure variation with mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199:22-31.
Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL. The changes in pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation after a “tidal volume challenge” reliably predict fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation. Crit Care Med 2017;45:415–21.
Messina A, Montagnini C, Cammarota G, Giuliani F, Muratore L, Baggiani M, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in prone neurosurgical patients undergoing protective ventilation: role of dynamic indices, tidal volume challenge, and end-expiratory occlusion test. Anesth Analg 2020;130:752–61.
Jun JH, Chung RK, Baik HJ, Chung MH, Hyeon JS, Lee YG, et al. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol 2019;19:142.
Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:659–63.
Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2016;42:1935–47.
Gavelli F, Shi R, Teboul JL, Azzolina D, Monnet X. The end expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care 2020;10:65.
Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 2009;37:951–6.
Monnet X, Teboul JL. Assessment of fluid responsiveness: recent advances. Curr Opin Crit Care 2018;24:190–5.
Jozwiak M, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid respon siveness in ventilated patients. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:352.
Monnet X, Marik PE, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care 2016;6:111.
Monnet X, Bataille A, Magalhaes E, Barrois J, Le Corre M, Gosset C, et al. End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:93–100.
Kang WS, Oh CS, Park C, Shin BM, Yoon TG, Rhee KY, et al. Diagnosis accuracy of mean arterial pressure variation during a lung recruitment maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:e3623710.
Prathep S, Petsakul S, Chainarong N, Cheewatanakornkul S, Tanasansuttiporn J. General anesthesia for cesarean section in a pregnant woman with truncus arteriosus intraoperatively monitored by transesophageal echocardiography. J Health Sci Med Res 2021;39:503-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
