Wound Healing Activity of Tanzanian-Sourced Centella asiatica on Second-Degree Burn Wounds in Wistar Rats
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Burn wounds heal slowly, often with complications. Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. (Apiaceae) has traditional uses in wound management, but region-specific evidence from Tanzania is lacking. The study aimed to evaluate the burn wound healing effect of topically applied C. asiatica leaf extract in a rat model of second-degree thermal injury, using complete epithelialization time as the primary outcome. This study was designed as a pilot/exploratory investigation to generate preliminary data on locally sourced plant material.
Methods: Fifteen male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to four groups: negative control (no treatment), positive control (1.0% silver sulfadiazine cream), 0.5% w/v C. asiatica ethanol extract dispersed in distilled water, and 1.0% w/v C. asiatica ethanol extract dispersed in distilled water. Standardized second-degree burns were induced on the dorsal skin under diethyl ether anesthesia. Treatments were applied once daily. Two rats died from inter-animal aggression during acclimatization and were excluded from analysis, leaving final group sizes of n=3 for three groups and n=4 for one group. Epithelialization time was recorded daily. Group comparisons used one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc test (significance at p-value < 0.05).
Results: The 1.0% w/v C. asiatica group showed the shortest mean epithelialization time (12.7 ± 0.6 days), followed by 0.5% w/v (14.0 ± 0.8 days), silver sulfadiazine (16.0 ± 0.8 days), and negative control (23.0 ± 1.0 days). ANOVA revealed significant differences among groups (F(3,9) = 68.67, p-value < 0.001). Post hoc analysis confirmed faster healing with both C. asiatica concentrations compared to silver sulfadiazine (p-value < 0.001) and untreated controls (p-value < 0.001). The difference between 0.5% and 1.0% C. asiatica was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.065), representing a non-significant trend rather than confirmed dose-dependence.
Conclusion: Topical C. asiatica ethanol extract (aqueous dispersion) significantly accelerates burn wound epithelialization in rats, with the higher concentration showing the fastest healing. These preliminary findings support further investigation of locally sourced C. asiatica as a potential low-cost intervention for burn care. However, due to substantial methodological limitations including small sample size, lack of vehicle control, unblinded assessment, and suboptimal anesthesia/analgesia protocols these results should be interpreted as hypothesis generating. Histological and phytochemical studies are needed before clinical translation.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
JHSAM publishes all articles in full open access, meaning unlimited use and reuse of articles with appropriate credit to the authors.
All our articles are published under a Creative Commons "CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0". License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided that the original work is properly cited and is used for noncommercial purposes.
References
Somboonwong J, Kankaisre M, Tantisira MH, Tantisira B. Wound healing activities of different extracts of Centella asiatica in incision and burn wound models: an experimental animal study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:103. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-103.
Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg. 1998;176(2A Suppl):26S-38S.
Diniz MM, Oliveira AC, Pereira TM, de Oliveira NR. Molecular and cellular mediators in cutaneous wound healing: from inflammation to tissue regeneration. J Inflamm Res. 2023;16:73-91.
Chatterjee A, Pakrashi SC, Dhar ML. The treatise on Indian medicinal plants. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Council of Scientific and Industrial Research; 2011.
Schultz GS, Chin GA, Moldawer L. Principles of wound healing. In: Fitridge R, Thompson M, editors. Mechanisms of vascular disease: a reference book for vascular specialists. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press; 2011.
Satake M. Medicinal plants and their cultivation. Tokyo: Yokendo Publishing; 2007.
Liu M. Evaluation of wound healing potential of triterpenoids from Centella asiatica in rat burn models. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;123(3):530-6.
Rafamantanana MH. Phytochemical profile and biological activity of Centella asiatica extracts. J Nat Remedies. 2009;9(1):22-9.
Gohil KJ. Pharmacological review on Centella asiatica: a potential herbal cure-all. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010;72(5):546-56.
Nomi AG, Handayani H, Khuluk RH. Antioxidant activity and metabolite changes in Centella asiatica with different drying methods using FTIR- and quantitative HPLC-based metabolomics. Int Food Res J. 2024;31(1):228-38.
Handa SS, Khanuja SPS, Longo G, Rakesh DD. Extraction technologies for medicinal and aromatic plants. Trieste: International Centre for Science and High Technology; 2008.
Boo XY, Chia LH. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of gels with Centella asiatica extracts for cosmeceutical purposes. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2024;13(5):109-17.
Mgonja F, Mohamed M, Mwangengwa M. Excision wounds healing activity of Centella asiatica (Gotukola) extract on laboratory rats. Tanzan J Health Res. 2022;23(1). doi:10.4314/thrb.v23i1.7.
Chippada SC, Vangalapati M, Bammidi SR. Wound healing activity of Centella asiatica extract. Int J Phytomed. 2011;3(3):319-24.
Dinarvand R, Sepehri N, Fouladdel S. Silver sulfadiazine: use in burn wound healing. Burns. 2015;41(5):1028-36.
Shukla A, Rasik AM, Dhawan BN. Asiaticoside-induced wound healing activity. Indian J Exp Biol. 1999;37(11):1136-40.
Hashim P, Sidek H, Helan MH, Sabery A, Palanisamy UD, Ilham M. Triterpene composition and bioactivities of Centella asiatica. Molecules. 2011;16(2):1310-22. doi:10.3390/molecules16021310.
Wu F, Bian D, Xia Y, Gong Z. Wound healing and anti-inflammatory properties of Centella asiatica extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;245:112177.
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412.
American Veterinary Medical Association. AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2020 edition. Schaumburg (IL): American Veterinary Medical Association; 2020.
Pereira MP, Perez AS, Barros MB. The panniculus carnosus as a confounding factor in wound healing studies in rats. Wound Repair Regen. 2014;22(4):501-7.
Sullivan NJ, Lloyd SA, Elmore LK. The porcine model for wound healing: a review. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(2):210-20.
Handa SS, Khanuja SPS, Longo G, Rakesh DD. Extraction technologies for medicinal and aromatic plants. Trieste: International Centre for Science and High Technology; 2008.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.