Comparative Effects of Arm Cycle Ergometer and Leg Cycle Ergometer on Vital Capacity, Blood Pressure, and Resting Heart Rate in Sedentary Adolescents

Main Article Content

Thanyawat Homsombat
Wisutthida Saengjan

Abstract

Introduction: A cycle ergometer is a stationary machine that enables cyclic rotations and can be used to carry out passive, active, and resistance exercises. Cycle ergometry promotes early healing and increases the individual's functional ability; lung capacity, blood pressure, and cardio-pulmonary endurance while they are sedentary. The experimental study aimed to investigate the comparative effects of arm cycle ergometers and leg cycle ergometers on vital capacity, blood pressure, and resting heart rate in adolescent sedentary subjects. 


Methods: Participants were twenty-eight male adolescents who do not have regular physical activity and were divided into 2 groups; leg cycling (n=14) and arm cycling (n=14). On the first occasion and post-trial, participants were evaluated for their vital capacity, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and resting heart rate. Both intervention conditions were performed for 60 minutes (10 mins for warm-up, 40 mins for exercise, and 10 mins for cooldown), three times per week for 8 weeks. Descriptive statistics were frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The inferential statistic was an independent t-test used to compare vital capacity, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks (post-test) in the arm cycling group and the leg cycling group at a 95% confidence interval.


Results: The resting heart rate and the diastolic blood pressure of the arm cycling group were significantly different from the leg cycling group (p-value=0.002 and p-value=0.010, respectively).  Conversely, the vital capacity and the systolic blood pressure of the arm cycling group were not significantly different from the leg cycling group (p-value=0.290 and p-value=0.480, respectively).


Conclusions: According to the present study, confirmed that this program has beneficial effects for improved cardiorespiratory fitness and decreased diastolic blood pressure in adolescent sedentary subjects.

Article Details

How to Cite
Homsombat, T., & Saengjan , W. . (2023). Comparative Effects of Arm Cycle Ergometer and Leg Cycle Ergometer on Vital Capacity, Blood Pressure, and Resting Heart Rate in Sedentary Adolescents. Journal of Health Science and Alternative Medicine, 5(02), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.14456/jhsam.2023.8
Section
Original Article

References

Chen X, Sekine M, Hamanishi S, et al. Lifestyles and health-related quality of life in Japanese school children: a cross-sectional study. Prev Med. 2005; 40(6): 668–78.

Gopinath B, Hardy LL, Baur LA, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviors and health-related quality of life in adolescents. Pediatrics. 2012; 130(1): e167–74.

Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Kho ME, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 41(6 Suppl 3): S240-65.

Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7(40): 1-17.

Herdy AH, Uhlendorf D. Reference values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing for sedentary and active men and women. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011; 96(1): 54-59.

Paap D, Takken T. Reference values for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in healthy adults: A systematic review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014; 12(12): 1439-1453.

Stickland MK, Butcher SJ, Marciniuk DD, Bhutani M. Assessing Exercise Limitation Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Pulm Med. 2012(19). 2012; 1-13.

Steins Bisschop CN, Velthuis MJ, Wittink H, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review. Sports Med. (Auckland, N.Z.). 2012; 42(5): 367-379.

Young EL, Karthikesalingam A, Huddart S, et al. A systematic review of the role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012; 44(1): 64-71.

Albouaini K, Egred M, Alahmar A. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and its application. Postgrad Med J. 2007; 83(985): 675-682.

Vanhees L, De Sutter J, Gelada SN, et al. Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in defining the benefits to cardiovascular health within the general population: recommendations from the EACPR (Part I). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 19(4): 670-686.

Orr JL, Williamson P, Anderson W, Ross R, McCafferty S, Fettes P. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: Arm crank vs cycle ergometry. Anaesthesia. 2013; 68(5): 497-501.

Secher NH, Volianitis S. Are the arms and legs in competition for cardiac output? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(10): 1797-1803.

Loughney L, West M, Pintus S, et al. Comparison of oxygen uptake during arm or leg cardiopulmonary exercise testing in vascular surgery patients and control subjects. Br J Anaesth. 2014; 112(1): 57-65.

Walker RD, Nawaz SH, Wilkinson C, Saxton J M, Pockley AG, Wood RF. Influence of upper- and lower-limb exercise training on cardiovascular function and walking distances in patients with intermittent claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31(4): 662-9.

Bronas Ulf Gunnar. Diane Treat-Jacobson, Arthur S Leon. Comparison of the effect of upper body-ergometry aerobic training vs treadmill training on central cardiorespiratory improvement and walking distance in patients with claudication. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(6): 1557-64.

Mitropoulos A, Gumber A, Crank H, and Klonizakis M. Validation of an arm crank ergometer test for use in sedentary adults. J Sports Sci Med. 2017; 16(4): 558-564.

Tiller NB, Ian GC, and Lee MR. Mechanical-ventilatory responses to peak and ventilation-matched upper- versus lower-body exercise in normal subjects. Experimental Physiology. 2019; 104(5): 920–931.

Munro BH. Statistical methods for health care research (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’S guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 10th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (latest edition), 2020.

Hill MW, Goss-Sampson M, Duncan MJ, Price MJ. The effects of maximal and submaximal arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry on postural sway. Eur J Sport Sci. 2014; 14(8); 782–790.

Stork MJ, Banfield LE, Gibala MJ, and Martin KA. A scoping review of the psychological responses to interval exercise: is interval exercise a viable alternative to traditional exercise?. Health Psychol. Rev. 2017; 11(9). 324-344.

Olney N, Wertz T, LaPorta Z, Mora A, Serbas J, and Astorino TA. Comparison of acute physiological and psychological responses between moderate intensity continuous exercise and three regimes of high intensity training. J Strength Cond Res. 2018; 32(3). 2130–2138.

Miller WR and Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York: Guilford Press, 2002.

Milanovic Z, Sporis G, and Weston M. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training (HIT) and continuous endurance training for VO2max improvements: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Sports Med. 2015; 45(7). 1469–1481.

Weston M, Taylor KL, Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIT) on fitness in adults: a meta-analysis of controlled and non-controlled trials. Sports Med. 2014; 44(7):1005-17. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0180-z.

Thum JS, Parsons G, Whittle T, and Astorino TA. High-intensity interval training elicits higher enjoyment than moderate intensity continuous exercise. PLoS One. 2017; 12(1). 1-11.

Astorino TA, and Emma D. Differences in physiological and perceptual responses to high intensity interval exercise between arm and leg cycling. Front Physiol. 2021; 12(8): 1-9.

Oliveira BRR, Santos TM, Kilpatrick M, Pires FO, and Deslandes AC. Affective and enjoyment responses in high intensity interval training and continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018; 13(16). 1-17.

Bassett DR. Scientific contributions of A V Hill: exercise physiology pioneer. J Appl Physiol. 2002; 93(5):1567-82.

Coyle EF. Physiological determinants of endurance exercise performance. J Sci Med Sport. 1999; 2(3): 181-9.

Joyner MJ and Dominelli PB. Central cardiovascular system limits to aerobic capacity. Exp Physiol. 2021; 106(12): 2299-2303.

Jones A. Sports science and coaching the physiology of the world record Holder for the women’s marathon. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2006, 1(2), 101–116.

Leicht AS, Sinclair WH, Spinks WL. Effect of exercise mode on heart rate variability during steady state exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008; 102(11): 195-204.

Zinner C, Morales-Alamo D, Ørtenblad N, Larsen FJ, Schiffer TA, Willis SJ, et al. The physiological mechanisms of performance lower extremities in humans. Front. Physiol. 2016; 7(426). 1-9.

Hoffmann MD, Kassay KM, Zeni AI, and Clifford PS. Does the amount of exercising muscle alter the metabolic demand of dynamic exercise? Eur J Appl Physiol. 1996; 74(11). 541–547.

Lindquist VA, Spangler RD, Blount SG Jr. A comparison between the effects of dynamic and isometric exercise as evaluated by the systolic time intervals in normal man. Am Heart J. 1973; 85(4): 227-236.

Liang N, Nakamoto T, Mochizuki S, Matsukawa K. Differential contribution of central command to the cardiovascular responses during static exercise of ankle dorsal and plantar flexion in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2011; 110(9): 670-680.

Ichinose M, Delliaux S, Watanabe K, Fujii N, Nishiyasu T. Evaluation of muscle metaboreflex function through graded reduction in forearm blood flow during rhythmic handgrip exercise in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011; 301(7): H609-H616.

Louhevaara V, Smolander J, Aminoff T, Korhonen O, and Shen NY. Cardiorespiratory responses to fatiguing dynamic and isometric handgrip exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000; 82(6): 340-344.

Iellamo F, Legramante JM, Raimondi G, Castrucci F, Damiani C et al. Effects of isokinetic, isotonic and isometric submaximal exercise on heart rate and blood pressure. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997; 75(2): 89-96.

Chapman JH, Elliott PW. Cardiovascular effects of static and dynamic exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988; 58(11): 152-157.