Comparison of Clients or Patients Attending Monk Healers and Primary Care Clinics in Thailand: A Cross-sectional Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare characteristics of clients or patients presenting to monk healers and primary care health facilities in Thailand.
Methods: Consecutively attending clients or patients of three monk healers or three health centres were assessed with self-reported measures of health status, symptoms and perceptions.
Results: The total sample included 1251 participants, 607 from the monk healers and 644 from the health centres. Most participants in the temple and health facility sites were female (76.6% and 72.8%, respectively). Compared to patients attending the health centres, clients of monk healers were younger in age, better educated, and had a higher economic status. The prevalence of heart attack or stroke, emphysema or asthma, sore joints, osteoporosis, cancer, migraine headaches, mental disorder, depression, sleeping problem, and tobacco use problem was significantly higher among clients of monk healers than health care centre patients. While, the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, was significantly higher among health centre patients than monk healer clients. Main symptoms or problems referring to psychological, social, spiritual, and female genital were significantly more frequent in clients attending monk healers than health centre patients, while main symptoms or problems referring to musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiovascular, digestive, and general and unspecified were significantly more frequent in health centre patients than clients attending monk healers. The causes or aetiology of psycho-social, supernatural and economic were significantly higher among monk healer than health centres clients, while the causes or aetiology behavioural, natural and physical were significantly higher among health centre than monk healer clients.
Conclusion: The study found a high proportion of psychological, social, spiritual, and female genital problems among clients attending monk healers, calling for an integrated approach of primary health care.
Article Details
JHSAM publishes all articles in full open access, meaning unlimited use and reuse of articles with appropriate credit to the authors.
All our articles are published under a Creative Commons "CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0". License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided that the original work is properly cited and is used for noncommercial purposes.
References
[2] Adthasit R, Kulsomboon S, Chantraket R, Suntananukan S, Jirasatienpong P. The situation of knowledge management and research in the area of local wisdom in health care. In: Petrakard P, Chantraket R, editors. The report situations of Thai traditional medicine, indigenous medicine and alternative medicine 2005–2007. Nonthaburi: Mnat Films; 2007. p. 16–22.
[3] Chan-iam W, Yodmalee B, Nakornriab M. Thai Traditional Medicine at Wat Nong Ya Nang Buddhist, Uthai Thani Province. Journal of Food Health and Bioenvironmental Science (May-August 2019), 12(2): 40-47.
[4] Kaewla W, Wiwanitkit V. Local primary health care by local religious center: A case study of a Mahayana Buddhist temple, Thailand. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2015;8:226.
[5] Phramaha Phanuvit Pannapajato (2013). Buddhist approach to disease burring with mental treatment. Journal of Graduate Studies Review, Nakhon Sawan Buddhist College, 2(1), 26-27.
[6] Jilek-Aall L, Jilek WG (1985) Buddhist Temple Treatment of Narcotic Addiction and Neurotic-Psychosomatic Disorders in Thailand. In: Pichot et al. (Eds.) Psychiatry The State of the Art (pp. 673-677). Springer. New York
[7] Peltzer K, Pengpid S, Puckpinyo A, Yi S, Anh le V. The utilization of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine for non-communicable diseases and mental disorders in health care patients in Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16:92. doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1078-0
[8] Kleinman A, Gale JL. Patients treated by physicians and folk healers: a comparative outcome study in Taiwan. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1982;6(4):405-423. doi:10.1007/BF00118886
[9] Ngoma MC, Prince M, Mann A. Common mental disorders among those attending primary health clinics and traditional healers in urban Tanzania. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:349-55.
[10] Krug K, Kraus KI, Herrmann K, Joos S. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as part of primary health care in Germany-comparison of patients consulting general practitioners and CAM practitioners: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16(1):409. doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1402-8
[11] Lloyd KR, Jacob KS, Patel V, St Louis L, Bhugra D, Mann AH. The development of the Short Explanatory Model Interview (SEMI) and its use among primary-care attenders with common mental disorders. Psychol Med. 1998;28(5):1231-7.
[12] Soler JK, Okkes I, Wood M, Lamberts H. The coming of age of ICPC: celebrating the 21st birthday of the International Classification of Primary Care. Fam Pract. 2008;25(4):312-317. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn028
[13] Rüdell K, Bhui K, Priebe S. Concept, development and application of a new mixed method assessment of cultural variations in illness perceptions: Barts Explanatory Model Inventory. J Health Psychol. 2009;14(2):336-347. doi:10.1177/1359105308100218
[14] Brun V. Traditional Thai medicine. In: Selin H & Shapiro H (eds.) Medicine across cultures: History and practice of medicine in non-western cultures (pp. 115-132). Secaucus, NJ, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[15] Chokevivat V, Chuthaputti A. The role of Thai traditional medicine in health promotion, 2005. From http://thaimedicinezone.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2014/09/Chokevivant-Chuthaputti-2005.pdf (Retrieved 12 Febr 2020)
[16] Mulholland J. Thai traditional medicine: Ancient thought and practice in a Thai context, 1976. URL: https://thesiamsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/1979/03/JSS_067_2i_Mulholland_ThaiTraditionalMedicine.pdf (accessed 2 April 2020)
[17] Ganhanapan A. Changing power and positions of Mo Muang in Northern Thai healing rituals. J Siam Society. 2000;88(1&2): 58-71.
[18] Rosendal M, Carlsen AH, Rask MT, Moth G. Symptoms as the main problem in primary care: A cross-sectional study of frequency and characteristics. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(2):91-99. doi:10.3109/02813432.2015.1030166
[19] Department for Development of Thai Traditional and Alternative Medicine, Ministry of Public Health. Thailand: chronological development; 2011. Available from http://globinmed.com/index.php?optioncom_content&viewarticle&id105160:thailand&catid196:country-scenario. Accessed October 1, 2019
[20] Grover S, Aneja J, Sharma A, et al. Explanatory models of somatoform disorder patients attending a psychiatry outpatient clinic: a study from North India. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014;60(5):492-498. doi:10.1177/0020764013501484
[21] Grover S, Kumar V, Chakrabarti S, et al. Explanatory models in patients with first episode depression: a study from north India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2012;5(3):251-257. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2012.07.003
[22] Shankar BR, Saravanan B, Jacob KS. Explanatory models of common mental disorders among traditional healers and their patients in rural south India. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2006;52(3):221-233. doi:10.1177/0020764006067215
[23] Hasan SS, Ahmed SI, Bukhari NI, Loon WC. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among patients with chronic diseases at outpatient clinics. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2009;15(3):152-157. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2009.02.003
[24] Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Utilization of traditional and complementary medicine in Indonesia: Results of a national survey in 2014-15. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2018;33:156-163. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.10.006
[25] Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence and Determinants of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine Provider Use among Adults from 32 Countries. Chin J Integr Med. 2018;24(8):584-590. doi:10.1007/s11655-016-2748-y
[26] Tangcharoensathien V, Witthayapipopsakul W, Panichkriangkrai W, Patcharanarumol W, Mills A. Health systems development in Thailand: a solid platform for successful implementation of universal health coverage. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1205-1223. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30198-3