Radiographic Findings of Cholangiocarcinoma in Roi-Et Hospital
Keywords:
Cholangiocarcinoma, CT, Cholangiocarcinoma, CT, MRIAbstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is cancer that had high incidence in Thailand, especially in northeast region. Since surgery is the only way to achieve cure in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, imaging are prerequisites for the determination of resectability and accurate preoperative staging. The aims of this study was to determine the radiographic findings, type, extension and metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma detected by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in Roi-Et hospital. Material and Method: A retrospective review of patients with cholangiocarcinoma, who had computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging performed in Roi-Et hospital,
between March 2019 to March 2021, included 200 patients (108 men, 92 women, 31-86 years old, mean age 61.6) by using Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) to access imaging features, type, extension and calculated to percentage
The most common type of cholangiocarcinoma in Roi-Et hospital was intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 98 cases (48%), hilar cholangiocarcinoma 65 cases (32.5%), Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 28 cases (14%). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma appear hypodense on non contrast CT (79.8%), peripheral enhancement follow by progressive and concentric filling in the tumor after contrast material injection (72.3%). On MRI intrahepatic
cholangiocarcinoma appeared hypointense on T1weighted images and hyperintense on T2 weighted images (85.0%
and 92.5%, respectively) with pattern of enhancement same as CT (76.2%). Most of hilar cholangiocarcinoma
was periductal type (95%), which show biliary stricture, thickened enhanced wall and upstream biliary dilatation
on CT and MRI. Only 5% of hilar cholangiocarcinoma were intraductal type. The imaging feathers of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were focal biliary stricture with thickened wall (92.8%), hyperenhancement (85.7%) ill-defined margin (64.3%), asymmetrical narrowing (71.4%) and abrupt narrowing (100%), mean length 18 mm., mean width 4 mm. Other findings included vascular invasion (47%), biliary dilatation (90%), capsular retraction (21.5%), lobar atrophy (12%), intrahepatic metastasis (32.5%), lymph node metastasis (40%), adjacent organ invasion (6.5%) and distant metastasis (31.5%). 61% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma, who had preoperative imaging was categorized as unresectable cases. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging has high accuracy to determined type, extension of cholangiocarcinoma and useful for planning of treatment and operation. Most of cholangiocarcinoma has typical imaging appearance. However in some cases cholangiocarcinoma may manifest with various imaging patterns that look like other condition. Awareness of the characteristics of cholangiocarcinoma is important for accurate diagnosis and for differentiation from other hepatic tumorous and nontumorous lesions.
References
วลัยลักษณ์ ชัยสูตร, ณสุดา ด่านชัยวิจิตร, กอบกุล เมืองสมบูรณ์, นิธิดา ณ สงขลา, โสภา พงศ์พรทรัพย์. Oncologic imaging ภาพวินิจฉัยโรคมะเร็ง. พิมพ์
ครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพ: เรือนแก้วการพิมพ์; 2552: 238-55.
Sriamporn S, Pisani P, Pipitgool V, et al. Prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection and incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand. Trop Med Int Health 2004: 9(5): 588-94.
Cancer research foundation for national cancer institute. Cancer in Thailand volume III; 2003: 34-7.
Watanapa P. Cholangiocarcinoma in patients with opisthorchiasis. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(3): 1062-4.
Kim TK, Choi BI, Han JK, et al. Peripheral cholangiocarcinoma of the liver: two-phase spiral CT findings. Radiology. 1997; 204(2): 539–43.
Valls C, Guma A, Puig I, et al. Intrahepatic peripheral cholangiocarcinoma: CT evaluation. Abdorn Imaging 2000; 25(5): 490-6.
Manfredi R, Barbaro B, Masselli G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2004; 24(2): 155–64.
Kim JY, Lee JM, Han JK, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI combined with MR cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures: differentiation of malignant from benign bile duct strictures. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26(2): 304–12.
Choi SH, Han JK, Lee JM, et al. Differentiating malignant from benign common bile duct stricture with multiphasic helical CT. Radiology. 2005; 236(1): 178-83.
Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KW, et al. Differentiating of extrahepatic bile duct cholangio carcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology. 2004; 233(1): 234-40.
Yu XR, Huang WY, Zhang BY, et al. Differentiating of infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma from benign common bile duct stricture using three-dimension dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with MRCP. Clin Radiol. 2014; 69(6): 567-73.
Gerd Otto , Bernd Romaneehsen, Maria Hoppe-Lotichius, Fernando Bittinger J, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: resectability and radicality after routine diagnostic imaging. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004; 11(5): 310-8.
Hongchen Zhang, Jian Zhu, Fayong Ke, Mingzhe Weng, Xiangsong Wu, Maolan Li, et al. Radiological Imaging for Assessing the Respectability of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed research international. 2015; 190(2): 396–405.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 สำนักงานป้องกันควบคุมโรคที่7จังหวัดขอนแก่น

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ความรับผิดชอบ
บทความที่ลงพิมพ์ในวารสารสำนักงานป้องกันควบคุมโรคที่ 7 ขอนแก่น ถือเป็นผลงานทางวิชาการหรือวิจัย และวิเคราะห์ตลอดจนเป็นความเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียน ไม่ใช่ความเห็นของวารสารสำนักงาน ป้องกันควบคุมโรคที่ 7 จังหวัดขอนแก่น หรือ ของกองบรรณาธิการแต่ประการใด ผู้เขียนต้องรับผิดชอบต่อบทความของตนเอง
ลิขสิทธ์บทความ
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์จะถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของสำนักงานป้องกันตวบคุมโรคที่ 7 จังหวัดขอนแก่น
