รูปแบบการนำแผนเชิงกลยุทธ์ไปสู่การปฏิบัติของหน่วยบริการปฐมภูมิ อำเภอเกษตรวิสัย จังหวัดร้อยเอ็ด

Abstract

The strategical planinto actionthatwas associated with membersof the organization at all levels. The seniormanagement oforganizations, responsible fortasksrelatedtotheiragencies. Thisstudywasresearchand development aimed to study the strategies into action plans and evaluate strategic PCU Kaset Wisai district. The goals consist of 1) 12 of executive Committee primary care networks, 2) 15 of health promoting hospital district, and 3) 16 of primary care units in hospitals. There were randomly selected by purposive sampling. The instruments were of the study included : 1) to analyze the literature and related research. 2) examine the theoretical sense, feasibility and the consistency of the model, 3) a report on the implementation of affrmative action by public service districts Kaset Wisai. Fiscal Year 2555 (October 2554 - August 2555) was used for data analysis, frequency and percentage. The research results were as follows: 1) A model of a strategically plan to follow the 4 steps (PIES), including (1) planning stages (P-planning) was a process for setting concrete policies and readiness to lead, into action (2) the implementation of the plan into action (I-implementation) was the process of transfer of knowledge and understanding of the strategy and action plan to all parties involved personnel, including those responsible. Preparation programs. Who was responsible for monitoring and evaluation, responsible for the organization’s standards. These people needed to understand the strategy and action plan for quality perfectly because of effciency and effectiveness of the work will depend on the level of knowledge and understanding of the plan, (3) process evaluation. (E-evaluation) process was a process of evaluation metrics that assess the result (Results or Lag Indicators) and (4) the standard procedure. (S-standardization) was a step that should
be assigned to a working group to monitor the performance if the performance is below target. Have to adopt an action plan to push to achieve the goals set. If the performance goals and the goals set out. Need to raise the threshold or target levels to rise, and 2) to evaluate the performance of offcial duties of the primary care district Kaset Wisai found that the government was in a very good level and good percentage 85.29 (29 KPIs) or 4.26 grade point average and score updates, 2.94 percentage (1 KPIs), but it was notable that there were indicators that the government was low, 8.82 percentage (3 KPIs) viz indicators 19th with the health security fund through the A level up to the point where indicators 21thpercentage of the value of the drug in Thailand health service under the Ministry, public health ,and indicators 29thpercentage of the success of  knowledge managementandindicatorswerenotevaluation,vizindicators6thpercentageofhospitalsachievedistricthealth indicators Love of family ties.