The Development of Performance Appraisal System of Department of Disease Control : An Application of Multiple Evaluation Approaches
Keywords:
performance appraisal system, multiple evaluation approachesAbstract
The objectives of this study were : 1) analyze the context 2) to develop performance appraisal system 3) to pilot performance appraisal system and 4) to evaluate efficacy performance appraisal system of Department of Disease Control : an application of multiple evaluation approaches. The Research and Development was applied. The study population and sample size was the Office of Disease Prevention and Control 6 Khon Kaen. The developed system was consisted of 4 main categories: 1) analyze the context and define the concept of performance appraisal system. 2) to develop performance appraisal system. 3) to pilot performance appraisal system. and 4) to evaluate effectiveness the performance appraisal system. The research instruments were : 1) questionnaires, 2) Analytical Assessment Report 3) evaluation form, 4) competency test 5) the group recorded form. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, compare the difference in performance between the 3 groups with Kendall’s W Test and content analysis. The research findings as follows.
1) The developed system was consisted of 4 main categories: 1) input factor : appraisal objective, duties and responsibilities, things to be evaluated, appraisal methods and tools, user involved in the evaluated, time frame to be evaluated and the appraisal result utilization. ; 2) process factor : confirmatory of indicator ; Balanced Scorecard and empowerment evaluation, to development indicator ; goal-based objective approach, and to self assessment evaluation; assessment 360 degree and empowerment evaluation. 3) output factor : the appraisal result, the results revealed that users’ satisfaction, 4) feedbacks and examine the efficacy of the developed system on four dimensions : accuracy, feasibility, propriety, and utility.
2) The effectiveness of the system found that the difference of the appraisal performance between to develop performance appraisal system and suggest director team of known group that agreement of consistency and test statistics that significantly statistical level .05 and users’ satisfaction levels were ranks at a high to highest level.
3) feedbacks found that the assessor and evaluate to be communicate gaps competency and individual development plan.
4) Examine the efficacy of the developed system found that users’ satisfaction levels was ranked at a high level on four dimensions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
ความรับผิดชอบ
บทความที่ลงพิมพ์ในวารสารสำนักงานป้องกันควบคุมโรคที่ 7 ขอนแก่น ถือเป็นผลงานทางวิชาการหรือวิจัย และวิเคราะห์ตลอดจนเป็นความเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียน ไม่ใช่ความเห็นของวารสารสำนักงาน ป้องกันควบคุมโรคที่ 7 จังหวัดขอนแก่น หรือ ของกองบรรณาธิการแต่ประการใด ผู้เขียนต้องรับผิดชอบต่อบทความของตนเอง
ลิขสิทธ์บทความ
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์จะถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของสำนักงานป้องกันตวบคุมโรคที่ 7 จังหวัดขอนแก่น
