Efficiency of Cholangiocarcinoma Detection in High Risk Populations of Phonthong district Roi-et Province according to the Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP)

Authors

  • นิสสา อาชวชาลี โรงพยาบาลโพนทอง จังหวัดร้อยเอ็ด

Keywords:

Cholangiocarcinoma, ultrasound

Abstract

This prospective analytical study aimed to study efficiency of cholangiocarcinoma detection in 1,000 High Risk Populations of Phonthong district Roi-et Province according to CASCAP.The result showed rate of subjects who required further testing after screening was 2% (20/1,000). Ten of the 20 subjects with a positive sonographic screening study had abdominal cancers detected on further investigation. One subject had false negative result. The positive predictive value of screening was 50% (10/20), and the rate of screening detection cancer was 1.0% (10/1,000). The prevalence of abdominal cancers was 1.1% (11/1,000), the sensitivity of screening for detection of abdominal cancers was 90.91% (10/11), and the specificity was 98.99% (979/989). CCA was suspected in 8 patients (2 cases of suspicious early cholangiocarcinoma and 1 case of refuse appropriate treatment), and 4/5 cases (80%) were at a curative resectable stage.             Cholangiocarcinoma detection in High Risk Populations of Phonthong district Roi-et Province according to CASCAP projectis effective because it has a relatively high sensitivity and can lead to premalignant lesions and early stage cholangiocarcinoma, resulting in improved patient outcomes.

References

1. Tyson GL, EI-Serag HB. Risk factors for chol2.angiocarcinoma.Hepatology 2011;54(1):174-84.

2. Charbel H, Al-Kawas FH. Cholangiocarcinoma:epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, anddiagnosis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011;24(2):182-7.

3. Shaib Y, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology ofcholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2004;24(2):115-25.

4. SripaB,PairojkulC.Cholangiocarcinoma:lessonsfrom Thailand. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008;24(3):349-56.

5. Attarasa P, Sriphung H. Cancer incidence inThailand. Bangkok: Ministry of Public Health,Ministry of Education; 2004-2006.

6. Khuntikao N. Current cocept in manangement of cholangiocarcinoma:SrinagarindMedicalJournal 2005 ;20(3):1-7.

7. YeoCJ, PittHA,CameronJL.Cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Clin North Am 1990; 70:1429-47.

8. Yazici C, Niemeyer DJ, lannitti DA, Russo MW. Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
2014;8(1):63-82.

9. Rizvi S, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2013 ;145(6):1215-29.

10. SungkasubunP,SiripongsakunS,Akkarachinorate K, Vidhyarkorn S, Worakitsitisatorn A,Sricharunrat T, et al. Ultrasound screening forcholangiocarcinoma could detect premalignantlesions and early-stage diseases with survivalbenefts. BMC Cancer 2016;16:346.

11. Chamadol N, Pairojkul C, Khuntikeo N,Laopaiboon V, Loilome W, Sithithaworn P.Histology confrmation of periductal fbrosis fromultrasound diagnosis in cholangiocarcinomapatients. Japanese Society of Hepato-BiliaryPancreatic Surgery 2014;21:316-22.

12. Mizuma Y, Watanabe Y, Ozasa K, Hayashi K,Kawai K. Validity of sonographic screening for the detection of abdominal cancers. J clin Ultras
2002; 30(7):408-15.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-20

How to Cite

1.
อาชวชาลี น. Efficiency of Cholangiocarcinoma Detection in High Risk Populations of Phonthong district Roi-et Province according to the Cholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP). J Offic Dis Prev Control 7 [internet]. 2018 Nov. 20 [cited 2026 Jan. 19];25(2):58-66. available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jdpc7kk/article/view/156363

Issue

Section

Research Article