Effect of Residual Eugenol from Temporary Cement After Various Cleansing Methods in Different time on Shear bond Strength of Self-etch Adhesive Resin Cement.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare shear bond strength between self-etch adhesive resin cement and dentin after temporary cement removal with various cleansing methods and time.
Materials and Methods: Dentin surfaces, 5 mm diameter, of third molars were prepared and cemented with acrylic disc using zinc oxide eugenol. The specimens were divided in to 2 groups (64 teeth per group) depending upon the duration of temporization, 24 hours or 7 days. The teeth in control group (n=15) were not temporary cemented. After the storage period, The zinc oxide eugenol were mechanically cleaned by using spoon excavator until it could not be seen macroscopically. The specimens in each group were divided into 4 groups for 4 cleansing methods; distilled water (+W), 17% Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA; +E), 10% maleic acid (+M) and 10-3 solution (+G), which contains 10% citric acid and 3% ferric chloride. One sample from each group was scanned using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to investigate the cleaned dentin surface. The remaining specimens (n=15 in each group) were permanently cemented with resin composite rods, 3 mm diameter,using self-etch adhesive resin cement, and then had shear bond strength tested. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Dunnet T3 test (α=0.05). The fractured surface of all specimens was examined using light microscope to categorize the mode of failures.
Result: Shear bond strength of the specimens in both groups of 24 hours and 7 days cleaned with maleic acid (25.40±2.32, 25.36±2.62 MPa) or 10-3 solution (27.37±2.25, 25.35±2.27 MPa) showed the significantly highest mean, which was not significantly different from that in the control group (25.71 ± 3.13 MPa). The lowest shear bond strength was found in the group of 24 hours cleaned with distilled water.
Conclusion: Cleaning the dentin surfaces contaminated from zinc oxide eugenol cement for 24 hours or 7 days with maleic acid or 10-3 solution produced the highest shear bond strength of self-etch adhesive resin cement.
Article Details
References
Jackson CR, Skidmore A, Rice RT. Pulpal evaluation of teeth restored with fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67(3): 323-325.
Cheung G, Lai S, Ng R. Fate of vital pulps beneath a metal‐ceramic crown or a bridge retainer. Int Endod J 2005; 38(8): 521-530.
Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years: IV. Cantilever or extension FPDs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15(6): 667-676.
Craig RG, Welker D, Rothaut J, et al. Dental materials. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 13 ed. United States: Elsevier; 2000. p. 337-339.
Sukapattee M, Wanachantararak S, Sirimaharaj V. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on pulpal blood flow after full crown preparation. CM Dent J 2017; 38(1): 93-100.
Fujisawa S, Kadoma Y. Action of eugenol as a retarder against polymerization of methyl methacrylate by benzoyl peroxide. Biomaterials 1997; 18(9): 701-703.
Paul S, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24(1): 8-14.
Bayindir F, Akyil MS, Bayindir YZ. Effect of eugenol and non-eugenol containing temporary cement on permanent cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin. Dent Mater J 2003; 22(4): 592-599.
Ribeiro JC, Coelho PG, Janal MN, Silva NR, Monteiro AJ, Fernandes CA. The influence of temporary cements on dental adhesive systems for luting cementation. J Dent 2011; 39(3): 255-262.
Carvalho CN, De Oliveira Bauer Jr, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of ZOE temporary restoration on resin‐dentin bond strength using different adhesive strategies. J Esthetic Restor Dent 2007; 19(3): 144-152.
Duarte Se. Adhesive resin cements for bonding esthetic restorations: a review. Biomaterials 2011: 42-66.
Nakabayashi N, Pashley D. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co.; 1998.
Yousaf A, Aman N, Manzoor MA, Shah J. Postoperative sensitivity of self etch versus total etch adhesive. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2014; 24(6): 383-386.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27(1): 17-28.
Perdigao J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Anauate-Netto C, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of self-etching adhesives in posterior restorations. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11(2): 149-159.
Ajaj R, Al-Mutairi S, Ghandoura S. Effect of eugenol on bond strength of adhesive resin: a systematic review. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014; 13(4): 950-958.
Copeland Jr HI. Setting reaction of zinc oxide and eugenol. J Res Natl Bur Stand 1955; 55: 133-138.
Hume W. An analysis of the release and the diffusion through dentin of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures. J Dent Res 1984; 63(6): 881-884.
Ren L, Li M, Pan Y, Meng X. Influence of polishing methods on the bonding effectiveness and durability of different resin cements to dentin. BioMed Res Int 2018; 1(1): 1-9.
Erkut S, Küçükesmen H, Eminkahyagil N, Imirzalioglu P, Karabulut E. Influence of previous provisional cementation on the bond strength between two definitive resin-based luting and dentin bonding agents and human dentin. Oper Dent 2007; 32(1): 84-93.
Saraç D, Bulucu B, Saraç YS, Kulunk S. The effect of dentin-cleaning agents on resin cement bond strength to dentin. JADA 2008; 139(6): 751-758.
Terata R. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1993; 12(1): 18-28.
Woody T, Davis R. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent 1992; 17(5): 175-180.
Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8(1): 31-34.
Chaiyabutr Y, Kois J. The effects of tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. Oper Dent 2008; 33(5): 556-563.
Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin‐bonding agents. EJOS 1987; 95(6): 516-520.
Silva J, Queiroz D, Azevedo L, et al. Effect of eugenol exposure time and post-removal delay on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to dentin. Oper Dent 2011; 36(1): 66-71.
Al Wazzan KA, Al Harbi AA, Hammad IA. The effect of eugenol‐containing temporary cement on the bond strength of two resin composite core materials to dentin. J Prosthodont 1997; 6(1): 37-42.
Latta MA, Kelsey WP, Murdock CM. Effects of adhesive liner and provisional cement on the bond strength of nickel/chrome/beryllium alloy cemented to dentin. Quintessence Int 2005; 36(10): 817-823.
Schwartz R, Davis R, Mayhew R. Effect of a ZOE temporary cement on the bond strength of a resin luting cement. Am J Dent 1990; 3(1): 28-30.
Mojon P, Hawbolt EB, MacEntee MI. A comparison of two methods for removing zinc oxide-eugenol provisional cement. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5(1): 78-84.
Grasso CA, Caluori DM, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E. In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88(4): 437-441.
Kanakuri K, Kawamoto Y, Matsumura H. Influence of temporary cement remnant and surface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. J Oral Sci 2005; 47(1): 9-13.
Duke E, Phillips R, Blumershine R. Effects of various agents in cleaning cut dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1985; 12(4): 295-302.
Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Kulunk T. Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94(4): 363-369.
Koch T, Peutzfeldt A, Malinovskii V, Flury S, Häner R, Lussi A. Temporary zinc oxide–eugenol cement: eugenol quantity in dentin and bond strength of resin composite. Eur J Oral Sci 2013; 121(4): 363-369.
Ballal NV, Kundabala M, Bhat K. Evaluation of the effecicacy of various concentrations of maleic acid and EDTA in removal of smear layer- an SEM study. Int J Clin Dent 2010; 3(4): 225-234.
Ballal NV, Mala K, Bhat KS. Evaluation of decalcifying effect of maleic acid and EDTA on root canal dentin using energy dispersive spectrometer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112(2): 78-84.
Prabhu SG, Rahim N, Bhat KS, Mathew J. Comparison of removal of endodontic smear layer using NaOCl, EDTA, and different concentrations of maleic acid–A SEM study. Endodontology 2003; 15(1): 20-25.
Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003; 36(12): 810-830.
Thompson JM, Agee K, Sidow SJ, et al. Inhibition of endogenous dentin matrix metalloproteinases by ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. J Endod 2012; 38(1): 62-65.
Munirathinam D, Mohanaj D, Beganam M. Efficacy of various cleansing techniques on dentin wettability and its influence on shear bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Adv Prosthodont 2012; 4(3): 139-145.
Kim DS, Park SH, Choi GW, Choi KK, Kim SY. Effect of EDTA treatment on the hybrid layer durability in total-etch dentin adhesives. Dent Mater J 2011; 30(5): 717-722.
Carvalho EM, Souza WLPd, Carvalho CN, Maciel AP, Loguercio AD, Bauer J. Effect of storage time on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive and multi-step resin cements to dentin. Mat Res 2016; 19(3): 695-701.
Huang M, Li M, Huang F, Ding S. The effect of thermocycling and dentine pre‐treatment on the durability of the bond between composite resin and dentine. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31(5): 492-499.
Reis A, Loguercio AD, Carvalho RM, Grande RHM. Durability of resin dentin interfaces: effects of surface moisture and adhesive solvent component. Dent Mater 2004; 20(7): 669-676.